Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PCB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
PCB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $341M | $621.31B | $440.67B | $21.89B | $29.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $209M | $40.00B | $32.79B | $11.66B | $21.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $22.24B | $15.57B | $2.67B | $3.20B |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 80.4% | 83.4% | 37.6% | 60.8% |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | 60.0% | 59.2% | 17.0% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.2x | 24.7x | 25.3x | 6.8x | 6.7x |
| Total Debt | $72M | $25.17B | $19.00B | $4.01B | $29.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $20.15B | $10.57B | $599M | $798M |
PCB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCB Bancorp (PCB) | 100 | 265.6 | +165.6% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 165.9 | +65.9% |
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 100 | 165.4 | +65.4% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 30.5 | -69.5% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 50.9 | -49.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PCB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PCB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +23.9% vs FISV's -70.9%
V ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 1.08x
- Beta 0.65, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.08x
- 50.1% margin vs FISV's 15.2%
MA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth 18.9%
- 435.6% 10Y total return vs V's 337.5%
- 16.4% NII/revenue growth vs FISV's 3.6%
- Beta 0.62 vs FISV's 0.87
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.19 vs V's 1.56
- Lower P/E (6.7x vs 6.8x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.28
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% NII/revenue growth vs FISV's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.7x vs 6.8x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.28 | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.1% margin vs FISV's 15.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs FISV's 0.87 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.9% vs FISV's -70.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.5% ROA vs PCB's 1.1%, ROIC 56.5% vs 9.2% |
PCB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PCB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 1 of 6 categories
FISV leads 1 • MA leads 1 • PCB leads 1 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V is the larger business by revenue, generating $40.0B annually — 191.0x PCB's $209M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FISV's 15.2%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $209M | $40.0B | $32.8B | $11.7B | $21.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $56M | $27.6B | $21.6B | $3.4B | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | $22.2B | $15.6B | $2.7B | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $21.2B | $17.7B | $2.7B | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.3% | +80.4% | +83.4% | +37.6% | +60.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +60.0% | +59.2% | +17.0% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | +50.1% | +45.6% | +22.9% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +53.9% | +51.6% | +23.6% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +30.1% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.1% | +35.3% | +21.2% | +30.6% | -29.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.6x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 85% valuation discount to FIS's 56.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.24x vs FIS's 2.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $341M | $621.3B | $440.7B | $21.9B | $29.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $388M | $626.3B | $449.1B | $25.3B | $57.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.29x | 31.75x | 30.13x | 56.47x | 8.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.24x | 24.67x | 25.31x | 6.75x | 6.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.47x | 2.00x | 1.44x | 2.32x | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.39x | 24.84x | 21.86x | 6.95x | 6.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.63x | 15.53x | 13.44x | 2.05x | 1.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 16.80x | 57.71x | 1.58x | 1.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.29x | 28.80x | 26.06x | 7.79x | 6.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MA delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $10 for PCB. PCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MA's 2.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MA scores 9/9 vs FISV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +58.9% | +2.1% | +18.4% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +22.7% | +29.5% | +7.5% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +29.2% | +56.5% | +6.0% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +36.2% | +64.4% | +6.6% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.66x | 2.45x | 0.29x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $47M | $5.0B | $8.4B | $3.4B | $28.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $20.2B | $10.6B | $599M | $798M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $72M | $25.2B | $19.0B | $4.0B | $29.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.56x | 26.72x | 27.23x | 15.37x | 6.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PCB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PCB five years ago would be worth $17,330 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,442 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, PCB leads with a +23.9% total return vs FISV's -70.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PCB at 25.5% vs FISV's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.1% | -6.3% | -11.3% | -34.8% | -17.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.9% | -8.3% | -13.4% | -44.2% | -70.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.5% | +43.1% | +32.1% | -13.8% | -54.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.3% | +47.9% | +38.8% | -65.6% | -52.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +186.0% | +337.5% | +435.6% | -21.9% | +3.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.5% | +12.7% | +9.7% | -4.8% | -23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PCB and MA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MA is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FISV's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCB currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 28.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.65x | 0.62x | 0.65x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.15 | $375.51 | $601.77 | $82.74 | $191.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.78 | $293.89 | $480.50 | $41.63 | $52.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +86.2% | +82.7% | +51.2% | +28.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 52.8 | 44.9 | 35.8 | 36.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 23K | 6.8M | 3.1M | 5.7M | 5.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — V and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PCB as "Hold", V as "Buy", MA as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", FISV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.5% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 8.5% for PCB (target: $26). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs MA's 0.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.00 | $362.45 | $657.38 | $67.14 | $74.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 61 | 64 | 37 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | +0.7% | +0.6% | +3.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 15 | 14 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $2.36 | $3.07 | $1.63 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +2.2% | +2.7% | +6.5% | +20.3% |
V leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PCB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PCB or V or MA or FIS or FISV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger pick with 16.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E (6. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Visa Inc. (V) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PCB or V or MA or FIS or FISV?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 8. 6x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 56. 5x. On forward P/E, Fiserv, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 56x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PCB or V or MA or FIS or FISV?
Over the past 5 years, PCB Bancorp (PCB) delivered a total return of +73.
3%, compared to -65. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MA returned +435. 6% versus FIS's -21. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PCB or V or MA or FIS or FISV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
62β versus Fiserv, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning FISV is approximately 42% more volatile than MA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PCB Bancorp (PCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 2% for Mastercard Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PCB or V or MA or FIS or FISV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is pulling ahead at 16.
4% versus 3. 6% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PCB Bancorp grew EPS 48. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FISV leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PCB or V or MA or FIS or FISV?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PCB or V or MA or FIS or FISV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 56x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) trades at 6. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for Mastercard Incorporated — 18. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 58. 5% to $67. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — PCB or V or MA or FIS or FISV?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
9% yield), PCB (3. 4% yield), V (0. 7% yield), MA (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PCB or V or MA or FIS or FISV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
62), 0. 6% yield, +435. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MA: +435. 6%, FISV: +3. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PCB and V and MA and FIS and FISV?
These companies operate in different sectors (PCB (Financial Services) and V (Financial Services) and MA (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and FISV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PCB is a small-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MA is a large-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. PCB, V, MA, FIS pay a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.