Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $35.65B | $39.20B | $104.20B | $97.33B | $45.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25.83B | $17.21B | $30.17B | $33.29B | $24.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.95B | $2.15B | $4.36B | $5.14B | $2.78B |
| Gross Margin | 45.9% | 67.5% | 43.1% | 58.4% | 29.5% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 17.3% | 24.1% | 27.0% | 21.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 17.4x | 20.2x | 18.6x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $61.34B | $28.75B | $65.82B | $90.87B | $50.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $713M | $1.63B | $1.64B | $245M | $1.15B |
PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PG&E Corporation (PCG) | 100 | 136.5 | +36.5% |
| Consolidated Edison… (ED) | 100 | 141.7 | +41.7% |
| The Southern Company (SO) | 100 | 162.0 | +62.0% |
| Duke Energy Corpora… (DUK) | 100 | 145.8 | +45.8% |
| Exelon Corporation (EXC) | 100 | 162.6 | +62.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PCG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (9.8x vs 15.6x)
ED carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta -0.41, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 7.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.41, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta -0.41, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.02x
SO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 137.8% 10Y total return vs EXC's 125.0%
DUK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.63 vs SO's 3.45
- 15.4% margin vs EXC's 11.2%
- +5.3% vs PCG's -5.0%
Among these 5 stocks, EXC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.9% revenue growth vs PCG's 2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 15.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.4% margin vs EXC's 11.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (118.9% vs 187.0%) | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs EXC's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.3% vs PCG's -5.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs PCG's 2.1%, ROIC 4.4% vs 4.0% |
PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PCG leads in 1 of 6 categories
ED leads 1 • DUK leads 1 • SO leads 0 • EXC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PCG and ED and DUK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DUK is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.3B annually — 1.9x ED's $17.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.4% (DUK) to 11.2% (EXC). On growth, PCG holds the edge at +15.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25.8B | $17.2B | $30.2B | $33.3B | $24.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.6B | $5.3B | $13.3B | $15.3B | $8.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.0B | $2.2B | $4.4B | $5.1B | $2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4.2B | $4.0B | -$3.8B | $6.6B | -$2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.9% | +67.5% | +43.1% | +58.4% | +29.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +17.3% | +24.1% | +27.0% | +21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +12.5% | +14.5% | +15.4% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.3% | +23.2% | -12.7% | +19.8% | -8.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.0% | +6.2% | +8.0% | +11.3% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.3% | +12.9% | -0.8% | +11.9% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PCG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.7x trailing earnings, PCG trades at a 42% valuation discount to SO's 23.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DUK offers better value at 0.67x vs SO's 4.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35.7B | $39.2B | $104.2B | $97.3B | $45.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $96.3B | $66.3B | $168.4B | $188.0B | $94.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.72x | 18.86x | 23.58x | 19.79x | 16.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.84x | 17.44x | 20.21x | 18.64x | 15.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.65x | 4.03x | 0.67x | 2.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.75x | 12.63x | 12.66x | 12.61x | 10.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.43x | 2.32x | 3.53x | 3.02x | 1.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 1.58x | 2.64x | 1.83x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1088.79x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ED leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SO delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $9 for ED. ED carries lower financial leverage with a 1.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PCG's 1.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ED scores 6/9 vs EXC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +9.0% | +11.3% | +9.6% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +4.0% | +2.8% | +2.6% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | +4.4% | +5.3% | +4.6% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +4.4% | +5.4% | +5.0% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.87x | 1.19x | 1.69x | 1.71x | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $60.6B | $27.1B | $64.2B | $90.6B | $49.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $713M | $1.6B | $1.6B | $245M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $61.3B | $28.8B | $65.8B | $90.9B | $50.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.61x | 3.11x | 2.51x | 2.57x | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DUK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXC five years ago would be worth $16,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,401 for DUK. Over the past 12 months, DUK leads with a +5.3% total return vs PCG's -5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DUK at 11.6% vs PCG's -1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.2% | +7.3% | +6.9% | +7.2% | +2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.0% | -1.1% | +3.6% | +5.3% | -0.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.6% | +17.6% | +35.5% | +38.9% | +14.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.2% | +57.2% | +60.6% | +44.0% | +61.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.1% | +84.5% | +137.8% | +104.1% | +125.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.9% | +5.6% | +10.7% | +11.6% | +4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ED and DUK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ED is the less volatile stock with a -0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PCG's 0.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DUK currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs PCG's 84.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | -0.41x | -0.15x | -0.24x | -0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.16 | $116.17 | $100.84 | $134.49 | $50.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.97 | $94.96 | $83.09 | $111.22 | $41.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.5% | +91.6% | +91.7% | +92.8% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.5 | 37.6 | 43.5 | 40.7 | 33.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21.3M | 1.8M | 4.5M | 3.5M | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ED and EXC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PCG as "Buy", ED as "Hold", SO as "Hold", DUK as "Hold", EXC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.1% upside for PCG (target: $23) vs 2.2% for ED (target: $109). For income investors, EXC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs PCG's 0.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $108.78 | $99.62 | $135.44 | $49.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 27 | 33 | 31 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +3.1% | +2.9% | +3.4% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | $3.25 | $2.72 | $4.25 | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PCG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ED leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Consolidated Edison, Inc.
(ED) is the stronger pick with 10. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for PG&E Corporation (PCG). PG&E Corporation (PCG) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PG&E Corporation (PCG) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC?
On trailing P/E, PG&E Corporation (PCG) is the cheapest at 13.
7x versus The Southern Company at 23. 6x. On forward P/E, PG&E Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Duke Energy Corporation wins at 0. 63x versus The Southern Company's 3. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC?
Over the past 5 years, Exelon Corporation (EXC) delivered a total return of +61.
8%, compared to +44. 0% for Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SO returned +137. 8% versus PCG's -67. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Consolidated Edison, Inc.
(ED) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 41β versus PG&E Corporation's 0. 45β — meaning PCG is approximately -208% more volatile than ED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 119% versus 187% for PG&E Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Consolidated Edison, Inc.
(ED) is pulling ahead at 10. 9% versus 2. 1% for PG&E Corporation (PCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exelon Corporation grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1. 8% for The Southern Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXC leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC?
Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
4% net margin versus 10. 8% for PG&E Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DUK leads at 26. 6% versus 17. 3% for ED. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ED leads at 62. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 63x versus The Southern Company's 3. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PG&E Corporation (PCG) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for The Southern Company — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCG: 42. 1% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Exelon Corporation (EXC) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 0. 6% for PG&E Corporation (PCG).
09Is PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Consolidated Edison, Inc.
(ED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 41), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ED: +84. 5%, PCG: -67. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PCG and ED and SO and DUK and EXC?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PCG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ED is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DUK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EXC is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.