Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PCG
PG&E Corporation

Regulated Electric

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$35.65B
5Y Perf.+36.5%
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Regulated Electric

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$39.20B
5Y Perf.+41.7%
SO
The Southern Company

Regulated Electric

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$104.20B
5Y Perf.+62.0%
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation

Regulated Electric

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$97.33B
5Y Perf.+45.8%
EXC
Exelon Corporation

Regulated Electric

UtilitiesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$45.43B
5Y Perf.+62.6%

PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PCG logoPCG
ED logoED
SO logoSO
DUK logoDUK
EXC logoEXC
IndustryRegulated ElectricRegulated ElectricRegulated ElectricRegulated ElectricRegulated Electric
Market Cap$35.65B$39.20B$104.20B$97.33B$45.43B
Revenue (TTM)$25.83B$17.21B$30.17B$33.29B$24.79B
Net Income (TTM)$2.95B$2.15B$4.36B$5.14B$2.78B
Gross Margin45.9%67.5%43.1%58.4%29.5%
Operating Margin19.4%17.3%24.1%27.0%21.0%
Forward P/E9.8x17.4x20.2x18.6x15.6x
Total Debt$61.34B$28.75B$65.82B$90.87B$50.55B
Cash & Equiv.$713M$1.63B$1.64B$245M$1.15B

PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PCG
ED
SO
DUK
EXC
StockMay 20May 26Return
PG&E Corporation (PCG)100136.5+36.5%
Consolidated Edison… (ED)100141.7+41.7%
The Southern Company (SO)100162.0+62.0%
Duke Energy Corpora… (DUK)100145.8+45.8%
Exelon Corporation (EXC)100162.6+62.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ED leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Duke Energy Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. PCG also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PCG
PG&E Corporation
The Value Play

PCG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (9.8x vs 15.6x)
Best for: value
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
The Income Pick

ED carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta -0.41, yield 3.1%
  • Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 7.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta -0.41, current ratio 1.02x
  • Beta -0.41, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.02x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SO
The Southern Company
The Long-Run Compounder

SO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 137.8% 10Y total return vs EXC's 125.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
The Value Pick

DUK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 0.63 vs SO's 3.45
  • 15.4% margin vs EXC's 11.2%
  • +5.3% vs PCG's -5.0%
Best for: valuation efficiency
EXC
Exelon Corporation
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, EXC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: utilities exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthED logoED10.9% revenue growth vs PCG's 2.1%
ValuePCG logoPCGLower P/E (9.8x vs 15.6x)
Quality / MarginsDUK logoDUK15.4% margin vs EXC's 11.2%
Stability / SafetyED logoEDLower D/E ratio (118.9% vs 187.0%)
DividendsED logoED3.1% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs EXC's 3.6%
Momentum (1Y)DUK logoDUK+5.3% vs PCG's -5.0%
Efficiency (ROA)ED logoED4.0% ROA vs PCG's 2.1%, ROIC 4.4% vs 4.0%

PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PCGPG&E Corporation
FY 2025
Electricity
73.0%$18.3B
Natural Gas, US Regulated
27.0%$6.8B
EDConsolidated Edison, Inc.
FY 2025
Electricity
74.5%$12.6B
Oil and Gas, Purchased
21.3%$3.6B
Steam
4.2%$703M
Non-Utility Products And Services
0.0%$3M
SOThe Southern Company
FY 2025
Southern Company Gas
50.0%$5.0B
Gas Distribution Operations
43.9%$4.4B
Gas Marketing Services
5.8%$582M
Gas Pipeline Investments
0.3%$32M
DUKDuke Energy Corporation
FY 2025
Other Revenues
100.0%$1.7B
EXCExelon Corporation
FY 2025
Commonwealth Edison Co
25.6%$7.3B
Pepco Holdings LLC
25.1%$7.1B
Baltimore Gas and Electric Company
18.4%$5.2B
PECO Energy Co
16.5%$4.7B
Delmarva Power and Light Company
6.9%$2.0B
Atlantic City Electric Company
6.0%$1.7B
Corporate Segment and Other Operating Segment
1.5%$424M

PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPCGLAGGINGEXC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — PCG and ED and DUK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

DUK is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.3B annually — 1.9x ED's $17.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.4% (DUK) to 11.2% (EXC). On growth, PCG holds the edge at +15.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPCG logoPCGPG&E CorporationED logoEDConsolidated Edis…SO logoSOThe Southern Comp…DUK logoDUKDuke Energy Corpo…EXC logoEXCExelon Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$25.8B$17.2B$30.2B$33.3B$24.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$9.6B$5.3B$13.3B$15.3B$8.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3.0B$2.2B$4.4B$5.1B$2.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4.2B$4.0B-$3.8B$6.6B-$2.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.9%+67.5%+43.1%+58.4%+29.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.4%+17.3%+24.1%+27.0%+21.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.4%+12.5%+14.5%+15.4%+11.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-16.3%+23.2%-12.7%+19.8%-8.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.0%+6.2%+8.0%+11.3%+7.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.3%+12.9%-0.8%+11.9%0.0%
Evenly matched — PCG and ED and DUK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PCG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 13.7x trailing earnings, PCG trades at a 42% valuation discount to SO's 23.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DUK offers better value at 0.67x vs SO's 4.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPCG logoPCGPG&E CorporationED logoEDConsolidated Edis…SO logoSOThe Southern Comp…DUK logoDUKDuke Energy Corpo…EXC logoEXCExelon Corporation
Market CapShares × price$35.7B$39.2B$104.2B$97.3B$45.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$96.3B$66.3B$168.4B$188.0B$94.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.72x18.86x23.58x19.79x16.21x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.84x17.44x20.21x18.64x15.57x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.65x4.03x0.67x2.54x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.75x12.63x12.66x12.61x10.79x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.43x2.32x3.53x3.02x1.87x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.09x1.58x2.64x1.83x1.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1088.79x
PCG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ED leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SO delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $9 for ED. ED carries lower financial leverage with a 1.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PCG's 1.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ED scores 6/9 vs EXC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPCG logoPCGPG&E CorporationED logoEDConsolidated Edis…SO logoSOThe Southern Comp…DUK logoDUKDuke Energy Corpo…EXC logoEXCExelon Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.1%+9.0%+11.3%+9.6%+9.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.1%+4.0%+2.8%+2.6%+2.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.0%+4.4%+5.3%+4.6%+5.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.0%+4.4%+5.4%+5.0%+5.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956555
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.87x1.19x1.69x1.71x1.76x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$60.6B$27.1B$64.2B$90.6B$49.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$713M$1.6B$1.6B$245M$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$61.3B$28.8B$65.8B$90.9B$50.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.61x3.11x2.51x2.57x2.42x
ED leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

DUK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EXC five years ago would be worth $16,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,401 for DUK. Over the past 12 months, DUK leads with a +5.3% total return vs PCG's -5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DUK at 11.6% vs PCG's -1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPCG logoPCGPG&E CorporationED logoEDConsolidated Edis…SO logoSOThe Southern Comp…DUK logoDUKDuke Energy Corpo…EXC logoEXCExelon Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-0.2%+7.3%+6.9%+7.2%+2.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-5.0%-1.1%+3.6%+5.3%-0.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-5.6%+17.6%+35.5%+38.9%+14.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+50.2%+57.2%+60.6%+44.0%+61.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-67.1%+84.5%+137.8%+104.1%+125.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.9%+5.6%+10.7%+11.6%+4.7%
DUK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ED and DUK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ED is the less volatile stock with a -0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PCG's 0.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DUK currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs PCG's 84.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPCG logoPCGPG&E CorporationED logoEDConsolidated Edis…SO logoSOThe Southern Comp…DUK logoDUKDuke Energy Corpo…EXC logoEXCExelon Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.45x-0.41x-0.15x-0.24x-0.14x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.16$116.17$100.84$134.49$50.65
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.97$94.96$83.09$111.22$41.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.5%+91.6%+91.7%+92.8%+87.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.537.643.540.733.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded21.3M1.8M4.5M3.5M8.3M
Evenly matched — ED and DUK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ED and EXC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PCG as "Buy", ED as "Hold", SO as "Hold", DUK as "Hold", EXC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.1% upside for PCG (target: $23) vs 2.2% for ED (target: $109). For income investors, EXC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs PCG's 0.62%.

MetricPCG logoPCGPG&E CorporationED logoEDConsolidated Edis…SO logoSOThe Southern Comp…DUK logoDUKDuke Energy Corpo…EXC logoEXCExelon Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$23.00$108.78$99.62$135.44$49.18
# AnalystsCovering analysts2927333135
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+3.1%+2.9%+3.4%+3.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises110111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.10$3.25$2.72$4.25$1.60
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — ED and EXC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

PCG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ED leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallPG&E Corporation (PCG)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PCG vs ED vs SO vs DUK vs EXC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Consolidated Edison, Inc.

(ED) is the stronger pick with 10. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for PG&E Corporation (PCG). PG&E Corporation (PCG) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PG&E Corporation (PCG) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC?

On trailing P/E, PG&E Corporation (PCG) is the cheapest at 13.

7x versus The Southern Company at 23. 6x. On forward P/E, PG&E Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Duke Energy Corporation wins at 0. 63x versus The Southern Company's 3. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC?

Over the past 5 years, Exelon Corporation (EXC) delivered a total return of +61.

8%, compared to +44. 0% for Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SO returned +137. 8% versus PCG's -67. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Consolidated Edison, Inc.

(ED) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 41β versus PG&E Corporation's 0. 45β — meaning PCG is approximately -208% more volatile than ED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 119% versus 187% for PG&E Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Consolidated Edison, Inc.

(ED) is pulling ahead at 10. 9% versus 2. 1% for PG&E Corporation (PCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exelon Corporation grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1. 8% for The Southern Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXC leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC?

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

4% net margin versus 10. 8% for PG&E Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DUK leads at 26. 6% versus 17. 3% for ED. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ED leads at 62. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 63x versus The Southern Company's 3. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PG&E Corporation (PCG) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for The Southern Company — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCG: 42. 1% to $23. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Exelon Corporation (EXC) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 0. 6% for PG&E Corporation (PCG).

09

Is PCG or ED or SO or DUK or EXC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Consolidated Edison, Inc.

(ED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 41), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ED: +84. 5%, PCG: -67. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PCG and ED and SO and DUK and EXC?

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PCG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ED is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DUK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EXC is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PCG

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ED

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DUK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PCG and ED and SO and DUK and EXC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PCG: 15.0% · ED: 6.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(PCG: 11.4% · ED: 12.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(PCG: 13.7x · ED: 18.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.