Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PEPG vs SRPT vs ALNY vs FOLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
PEPG vs SRPT vs ALNY vs FOLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $127M | $2.42B | $40.43B | $4.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.18B | $4.29B | $599M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-90M | $65M | $577M | $-14M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.4% | 80.9% | 89.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -1.9% | 17.5% | 5.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.7x | 45.2x | 40.6x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $1.04B | $1.28B | $444M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $801M | $1.66B | $214M |
PEPG vs SRPT vs ALNY vs FOLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PepGen Inc. (PEPG) | 100 | 16.5 | -83.5% |
| Sarepta Therapeutic… (SRPT) | 100 | 31.6 | -68.4% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 240.9 | +140.9% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 189.8 | +89.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEPG vs SRPT vs ALNY vs FOLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEPG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.17
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 11.94x
- Beta 0.17, current ratio 11.94x
- Beta 0.17 vs SRPT's 2.02, lower leverage
SRPT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 40.6x)
ALNY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 445.5% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 125.0%
- 65.2% revenue growth vs PEPG's -1.0%
- 13.5% margin vs FOLD's -2.3%
FOLD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +134.1% vs SRPT's -50.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.2% revenue growth vs PEPG's -1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 40.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.5% margin vs FOLD's -2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs SRPT's 2.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.1% vs SRPT's -50.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs PEPG's -60.4%, ROIC 33.4% vs -73.2% |
PEPG vs SRPT vs ALNY vs FOLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PEPG vs SRPT vs ALNY vs FOLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALNY leads in 3 of 6 categories
SRPT leads 1 • PEPG leads 0 • FOLD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY and PEPG operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALNY is the more profitable business, keeping 13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FOLD's -2.3%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2.2B | $4.3B | $599M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$90M | -$6M | $677M | $40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$90M | $65M | $577M | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$82M | $107M | $641M | $10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +34.4% | +80.9% | +89.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -1.9% | +17.5% | +5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +3.0% | +13.5% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +4.9% | +15.0% | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -1.9% | +96.4% | +19.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.3% | +162.6% | +4.4% | +3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SRPT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ALNY's 71.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 140.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $127M | $2.4B | $40.4B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $2.7B | $40.0B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.87x | -3.23x | 130.04x | -80.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.67x | 45.24x | 40.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 71.87x | 140.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.10x | 10.89x | 8.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.53x | 2.12x | 51.71x | 22.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 86.87x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-76 for PEPG. PEPG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 2.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs SRPT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -75.7% | +4.9% | +98.3% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.4% | +1.9% | +11.8% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -73.2% | -31.4% | +33.4% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.4% | -24.0% | +15.3% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.91x | 1.62x | 2.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$44M | $238M | -$379M | $230M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $801M | $1.7B | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $1.0B | $1.3B | $444M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.00x | 2.02x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALNY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALNY five years ago would be worth $22,937 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,431 for PEPG. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +134.1% total return vs SRPT's -50.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALNY at 13.0% vs PEPG's -50.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -74.3% | +8.1% | -24.3% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.0% | -50.7% | +12.3% | +134.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | -81.8% | +44.3% | +19.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.7% | -69.1% | +129.4% | +50.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.7% | +30.1% | +445.5% | +125.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.2% | -43.4% | +13.0% | +6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PEPG and FOLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PEPG is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SRPT's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs PEPG's 23.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | 2.02x | 0.71x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.80 | $63.92 | $495.55 | $14.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.01 | $10.42 | $245.96 | $5.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.7% | +36.0% | +61.1% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 56.5 | 42.4 | 72.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 2.9M | 1.1M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PEPG as "Buy", SRPT as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 279.4% upside for PEPG (target: $7) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $24.63 | $445.67 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 54 | 52 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALNY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SRPT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PEPG vs SRPT vs ALNY vs FOLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEPG or SRPT or ALNY or FOLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 6% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT). Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ALNY) offers the better valuation at 130. 0x trailing P/E (45. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PepGen Inc. (PEPG) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PEPG or SRPT or ALNY or FOLD?
On forward P/E, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PEPG or SRPT or ALNY or FOLD?
Over the past 5 years, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) delivered a total return of +129. 4%, compared to -85. 7% for PepGen Inc. (PEPG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALNY returned +445. 5% versus PEPG's -85. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PEPG or SRPT or ALNY or FOLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PepGen Inc.
(PEPG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 17β versus Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning SRPT is approximately 1070% more volatile than PEPG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PepGen Inc. (PEPG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 2% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PEPG or SRPT or ALNY or FOLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus 15. 6% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -404. 7% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PEPG or SRPT or ALNY or FOLD?
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -32. 5% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALNY leads at 13. 5% versus -29. 9% for SRPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FOLD leads at 90. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PEPG or SRPT or ALNY or FOLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
(SRPT) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 45. 2x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 37. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PEPG: 279. 4% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PEPG or SRPT or ALNY or FOLD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PEPG or SRPT or ALNY or FOLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PepGen Inc.
(PEPG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17)). Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PEPG: -85. 7%, SRPT: +30. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PEPG and SRPT and ALNY and FOLD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PEPG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SRPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.