Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PERI vs PUBM vs MGNI vs TTD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Advertising Agencies
Software - Application
PERI vs PUBM vs MGNI vs TTD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $483M | $485M | $2.01B | $11.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $440M | $282M | $723M | $2.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-17M | $159M | $433M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | 63.2% | 63.4% | 77.8% |
| Operating Margin | -3.4% | -7.3% | 14.8% | 20.3% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | — | 13.4x | 21.2x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $44M | $279M | $436M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $91M | $146M | $553M | $658M |
PERI vs PUBM vs MGNI vs TTD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) | 100 | 84.7 | -15.3% |
| PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) | 100 | 36.6 | -63.4% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 45.6 | -54.4% |
| The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) | 100 | 29.3 | -70.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PERI vs PUBM vs MGNI vs TTD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PERI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94
- 139.6% 10Y total return vs TTD's 6.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 6.3%, current ratio 2.76x
- Beta 0.94, current ratio 2.76x
PUBM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MGNI is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 22.0% margin vs PUBM's -6.2%
TTD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 16.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
- 18.5% revenue growth vs PERI's -11.7%
- 7.3% ROA vs PUBM's -2.6%, ROIC 21.3% vs -6.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs PERI's -11.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 21.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.0% margin vs PUBM's -6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs MGNI's 1.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.9% vs TTD's -58.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs PUBM's -2.6%, ROIC 21.3% vs -6.8% |
PERI vs PUBM vs MGNI vs TTD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PERI vs PUBM vs MGNI vs TTD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TTD leads in 2 of 6 categories
PERI leads 2 • PUBM leads 0 • MGNI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 10.5x PUBM's $282M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PUBM's -6.2%. On growth, TTD holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $440M | $282M | $723M | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | $11M | $145M | $693M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$17M | $159M | $433M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $43M | $44M | $837M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.3% | +63.2% | +63.4% | +77.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | -7.3% | +14.8% | +20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | -6.2% | +22.0% | +14.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +15.1% | +6.1% | +28.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | -2.0% | +5.5% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.7% | -35.0% | +142.9% | -20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PERI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 43% valuation discount to TTD's 25.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PERI's 106.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $483M | $485M | $2.0B | $11.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $434M | $384M | $1.7B | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -56.74x | -33.03x | 14.74x | 25.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.89x | — | 13.45x | 21.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 106.04x | 14.47x | 11.43x | 15.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.10x | 1.72x | 2.81x | 3.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.67x | 1.83x | 2.33x | 4.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.66x | 7.28x | 12.11x | 14.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TTD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PUBM. PERI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGNI's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGNI scores 6/9 vs PERI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.2% | -7.0% | +18.6% | +16.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | -2.6% | +5.3% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.7% | -6.8% | +9.5% | +21.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.8% | -5.5% | +7.3% | +19.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.17x | 0.30x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$49M | -$102M | -$275M | -$222M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $91M | $146M | $553M | $658M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $44M | $279M | $436M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 4.03x | 1591.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PERI and MGNI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PERI five years ago would be worth $6,282 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,295 for PUBM. Over the past 12 months, PERI leads with a +16.9% total return vs TTD's -58.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGNI at 16.7% vs PERI's -31.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.3% | +19.2% | -12.8% | -37.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.9% | +2.0% | +12.6% | -58.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.0% | -18.5% | +58.7% | -63.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.2% | -77.1% | -60.9% | -64.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.6% | -65.2% | -4.7% | +680.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.6% | -6.6% | +16.7% | -28.7% |
Risk & Volatility
PERI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PERI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGNI's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PERI currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs TTD's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.51x | 1.63x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.79 | $13.88 | $26.65 | $91.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.07 | $6.21 | $10.82 | $19.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +73.8% | +52.5% | +25.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 66.5 | 55.4 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 321K | 746K | 2.1M | 20.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PERI as "Buy", PUBM as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy", TTD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.0% upside for TTD (target: $37) vs 28.6% for MGNI (target: $18).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $14.00 | $18.00 | $37.12 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 16 | 31 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +14.7% | +9.6% | +2.3% | +12.3% |
TTD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PERI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
PERI vs PUBM vs MGNI vs TTD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PERI or PUBM or MGNI or TTD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 7% for Perion Network Ltd. (PERI). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PERI or PUBM or MGNI or TTD?
On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus The Trade Desk, Inc. at 25. 8x. On forward P/E, Perion Network Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PERI or PUBM or MGNI or TTD?
Over the past 5 years, Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) delivered a total return of -37. 2%, compared to -77. 1% for PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTD returned +680. 4% versus PUBM's -65. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PERI or PUBM or MGNI or TTD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Magnite, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning MGNI is approximately 73% more volatile than PERI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 30% for Magnite, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PERI or PUBM or MGNI or TTD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus -11. 7% for Perion Network Ltd. (PERI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -234. 8% for PubMatic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTD leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PERI or PUBM or MGNI or TTD?
Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -5. 1% for PubMatic, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTD leads at 20. 3% versus -6. 1% for PUBM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTD leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PERI or PUBM or MGNI or TTD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 21. 2x for The Trade Desk, Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTD: 58. 0% to $37. 12.
08Which pays a better dividend — PERI or PUBM or MGNI or TTD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PERI or PUBM or MGNI or TTD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), +680. 4% 10Y return). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTD: +680. 4%, MGNI: -4. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PERI and PUBM and MGNI and TTD?
These companies operate in different sectors (PERI (Communication Services) and PUBM (Technology) and MGNI (Communication Services) and TTD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PERI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PUBM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TTD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 20%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.