Food Distribution
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PFGC vs CASY vs WMT vs SYY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Food Distribution
PFGC vs CASY vs WMT vs SYY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Distribution | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $14.57B | $31.59B | $1.04T | $34.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $66.75B | $16.98B | $703.06B | $83.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $329M | $650M | $22.91B | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | 23.9% | 24.9% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.2% | 6.3% | 4.1% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 19.9x | 47.1x | 44.7x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $8.00B | $2.96B | $67.09B | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $79M | $327M | $10.73B | $1.07B |
PFGC vs CASY vs WMT vs SYY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Food Gr… (PFGC) | 100 | 347.9 | +247.9% |
| Casey's General Sto… (CASY) | 100 | 532.7 | +432.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 132.1 | +32.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PFGC vs CASY vs WMT vs SYY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PFGC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 8.6% revenue growth vs SYY's 3.2%
CASY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs WMT's 499.5%
- 3.8% margin vs PFGC's 0.5%
- +83.1% vs SYY's +6.4%
- 10.0% ROA vs PFGC's 1.8%, ROIC 11.3% vs 5.7%
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.12 vs PFGC's 0.60, lower leverage
SYY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and defensive is your priority.
- PEG 0.29 vs WMT's 4.06
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 44.7x), PEG 0.29 vs 4.06
- 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs CASY's 0.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs SYY's 3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 44.7x), PEG 0.29 vs 4.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs PFGC's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs PFGC's 0.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs CASY's 0.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.1% vs SYY's +6.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs PFGC's 1.8%, ROIC 11.3% vs 5.7% |
PFGC vs CASY vs WMT vs SYY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PFGC vs CASY vs WMT vs SYY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CASY leads in 3 of 6 categories
SYY leads 2 • PFGC leads 0 • WMT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CASY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 41.4x CASY's $17.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.8% (CASY) to 0.5% (PFGC). On growth, PFGC holds the edge at +6.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $66.7B | $17.0B | $703.1B | $83.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $1.5B | $42.8B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $329M | $650M | $22.9B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $667M | $15.3B | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +23.9% | +24.9% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +6.3% | +4.1% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +3.8% | +3.3% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +3.9% | +2.2% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.4% | +0.3% | +5.8% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.0% | +49.8% | +35.1% | -13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SYY leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, SYY trades at a 66% valuation discount to CASY's 58.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.36x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.6B | $31.6B | $1.04T | $34.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.5B | $34.2B | $1.09T | $48.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.53x | 58.13x | 47.69x | 19.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.88x | 47.05x | 44.71x | 15.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.73x | 4.33x | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.65x | 28.51x | 24.85x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.23x | 1.98x | 1.46x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.24x | 9.06x | 10.45x | 19.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.69x | 54.03x | 24.97x | 19.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CASY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $7 for PFGC. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CASY scores 6/9 vs PFGC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +23.7% | +22.3% | +80.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +10.0% | +7.9% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +11.3% | +14.7% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.1% | +12.5% | +17.5% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.79x | 0.84x | 0.67x | 7.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.9B | $2.6B | $56.4B | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $79M | $327M | $10.7B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.0B | $3.0B | $67.1B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.69x | 13.45x | 11.85x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CASY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CASY five years ago would be worth $38,512 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,614 for SYY. Over the past 12 months, CASY leads with a +83.1% total return vs SYY's +6.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CASY at 55.0% vs SYY's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.3% | +53.2% | +15.7% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.8% | +83.1% | +32.7% | +6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.6% | +272.4% | +160.5% | +4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.7% | +285.1% | +186.9% | -3.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +249.2% | +638.3% | +499.5% | +82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.9% | +55.0% | +37.6% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CASY and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFGC's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CASY currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs SYY's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.29x | 0.12x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $109.05 | $867.40 | $134.69 | $91.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $77.44 | $430.00 | $91.89 | $68.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.0% | +98.1% | +96.7% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 76.8 | 55.9 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 545K | 17.2M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PFGC as "Buy", CASY as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", SYY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.1% upside for SYY (target: $90) vs -19.1% for CASY (target: $688). For income investors, SYY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs CASY's 0.23%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $111.75 | $688.10 | $137.04 | $90.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 25 | 64 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +0.7% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 19 | 37 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.94 | $0.94 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +0.0% | +0.8% | +3.6% |
CASY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SYY leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PFGC vs CASY vs WMT vs SYY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PFGC or CASY or WMT or SYY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is the stronger pick with 8.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). Sysco Corporation (SYY) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PFGC or CASY or WMT or SYY?
On trailing P/E, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the cheapest at 19.
5x versus Casey's General Stores, Inc. at 58. 1x. On forward P/E, Sysco Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PFGC or CASY or WMT or SYY?
Over the past 5 years, Casey's General Stores, Inc.
(CASY) delivered a total return of +285. 1%, compared to -3. 9% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CASY returned +638. 3% versus SYY's +82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PFGC or CASY or WMT or SYY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Performance Food Group Company's 0. 60β — meaning PFGC is approximately 415% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PFGC or CASY or WMT or SYY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is pulling ahead at 8.
6% versus 3. 2% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -21. 9% for Performance Food Group Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, PFGC leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PFGC or CASY or WMT or SYY?
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
(CASY) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus 0. 5% for Performance Food Group Company — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CASY leads at 5. 0% versus 1. 3% for PFGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMT leads at 24. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PFGC or CASY or WMT or SYY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sysco Corporation (SYY) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 47. 1x for Casey's General Stores, Inc. — 31. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYY: 24. 1% to $90. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — PFGC or CASY or WMT or SYY?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield), CASY (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. PFGC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PFGC or CASY or WMT or SYY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, PFGC: +249. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PFGC and CASY and WMT and SYY?
These companies operate in different sectors (PFGC (Consumer Defensive) and CASY (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and SYY (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WMT, SYY pay a dividend while PFGC, CASY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.