Food Distribution
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PFGC vs USFD vs SYY vs CHEF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
PFGC vs USFD vs SYY vs CHEF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Distribution | Food Distribution | Food Distribution | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $14.57B | $19.16B | $34.91B | $3.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $66.75B | $39.68B | $83.57B | $4.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $329M | $677M | $1.74B | $79M |
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | 17.4% | 18.5% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.2% | 3.1% | 3.6% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 19.9x | 18.2x | 15.9x | 36.8x |
| Total Debt | $8.00B | $5.72B | $14.49B | $1.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $79M | $41M | $1.07B | $121M |
PFGC vs USFD vs SYY vs CHEF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Food Gr… (PFGC) | 100 | 347.9 | +247.9% |
| US Foods Holding Co… (USFD) | 100 | 453.9 | +353.9% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 132.1 | +32.1% |
| The Chefs' Warehous… (CHEF) | 100 | 542.8 | +442.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PFGC vs USFD vs SYY vs CHEF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PFGC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
USFD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, current ratio 1.16x
SYY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 36.8x)
- 2.1% margin vs PFGC's 0.5%
CHEF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 27.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.7%
- 373.1% 10Y total return vs PFGC's 249.2%
- 9.4% revenue growth vs SYY's 3.2%
- +29.6% vs SYY's +6.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs SYY's 3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 36.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs PFGC's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs CHEF's 0.63 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.6% vs SYY's +6.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs PFGC's 1.8%, ROIC 15.7% vs 5.7% |
PFGC vs USFD vs SYY vs CHEF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PFGC vs USFD vs SYY vs CHEF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYY leads in 3 of 6 categories
CHEF leads 2 • PFGC leads 0 • USFD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHEF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYY is the larger business by revenue, generating $83.6B annually — 19.6x CHEF's $4.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.1% (SYY) to 0.5% (PFGC). On growth, CHEF holds the edge at +11.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $66.7B | $39.7B | $83.6B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $1.6B | $4.0B | $419M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $329M | $677M | $1.7B | $79M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $848M | $2.0B | $81M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +17.4% | +18.5% | +24.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +3.1% | +3.6% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +1.7% | +2.1% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +2.1% | +2.4% | +1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.4% | +2.8% | +4.7% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.0% | +6.1% | -13.4% | +60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SYY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, SYY trades at a 59% valuation discount to CHEF's 47.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SYY's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHEF's 18.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.6B | $19.2B | $34.9B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.5B | $24.8B | $48.3B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.53x | 29.55x | 19.54x | 47.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.88x | 18.20x | 15.88x | 36.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.65x | 14.67x | 11.58x | 18.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.23x | 0.49x | 0.43x | 0.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.24x | 4.64x | 19.23x | 6.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.69x | 19.98x | 19.60x | 37.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $7 for PFGC. USFD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), USFD scores 7/9 vs PFGC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +15.3% | +80.7% | +13.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +4.8% | +6.4% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +9.3% | +15.7% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.1% | +12.0% | +19.0% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.79x | 1.33x | 7.81x | 1.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.9B | $5.7B | $13.4B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $79M | $41M | $1.1B | $121M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.0B | $5.7B | $14.5B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.69x | 3.94x | 4.35x | 3.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHEF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHEF five years ago would be worth $24,950 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,614 for SYY. Over the past 12 months, CHEF leads with a +29.6% total return vs SYY's +6.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHEF at 32.1% vs SYY's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.3% | +16.4% | +1.9% | +28.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.8% | +25.7% | +6.4% | +29.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.6% | +125.7% | +4.0% | +130.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.7% | +114.1% | -3.9% | +149.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +249.2% | +248.8% | +82.2% | +373.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.9% | +31.2% | +1.3% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SYY and CHEF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYY is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHEF's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHEF currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs SYY's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.50x | 0.47x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $109.05 | $102.13 | $91.69 | $80.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $77.44 | $66.89 | $68.19 | $53.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.0% | +85.1% | +79.5% | +99.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 51.0 | 41.7 | 75.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 2.2M | 4.7M | 471K |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PFGC as "Buy", USFD as "Buy", SYY as "Buy", CHEF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.7% upside for USFD (target: $108) vs 3.7% for CHEF (target: $83). SYY is the only dividend payer here at 2.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $111.75 | $108.33 | $90.44 | $83.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 25 | 30 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 37 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +5.1% | +3.6% | +0.5% |
SYY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CHEF leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
PFGC vs USFD vs SYY vs CHEF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PFGC or USFD or SYY or CHEF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
(CHEF) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). Sysco Corporation (SYY) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PFGC or USFD or SYY or CHEF?
On trailing P/E, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the cheapest at 19.
5x versus The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. at 47. 8x. On forward P/E, Sysco Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PFGC or USFD or SYY or CHEF?
Over the past 5 years, The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
(CHEF) delivered a total return of +149. 5%, compared to -3. 9% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHEF returned +373. 1% versus SYY's +82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PFGC or USFD or SYY or CHEF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. 's 0. 63β — meaning CHEF is approximately 34% more volatile than SYY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 133% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PFGC or USFD or SYY or CHEF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
(CHEF) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus 3. 2% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: US Foods Holding Corp. grew EPS 45. 5% year-over-year, compared to -21. 9% for Performance Food Group Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHEF leads at 16. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PFGC or USFD or SYY or CHEF?
Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
2% net margin versus 0. 5% for Performance Food Group Company — meaning it keeps 2. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYY leads at 3. 8% versus 1. 3% for PFGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHEF leads at 24. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PFGC or USFD or SYY or CHEF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sysco Corporation (SYY) trades at 15.
9x forward P/E versus 36. 8x for The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. — 20. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USFD: 24. 7% to $108. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — PFGC or USFD or SYY or CHEF?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. PFGC, USFD, CHEF do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PFGC or USFD or SYY or CHEF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYY: +82. 2%, PFGC: +249. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PFGC and USFD and SYY and CHEF?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
SYY pays a dividend while PFGC, USFD, CHEF do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.