Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PGY vs COF vs SYF vs UPST vs LC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
PGY vs COF vs SYF vs UPST vs LC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.28B | $119.19B | $25.72B | $2.78B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.30B | $69.25B | $19.12B | $1.08B | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $98M | $2.45B | $3.60B | $49M | $136M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 47.3% | 51.0% | 95.2% | 64.7% |
| Operating Margin | 21.8% | 3.3% | 24.2% | 5.1% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 9.8x | 8.0x | 14.7x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $923M | $51.00B | $15.18B | $1.85B | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $288M | $57.43B | $14.97B | $657M | $918M |
PGY vs COF vs SYF vs UPST vs LC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pagaya Technologies… (PGY) | 100 | 13.1 | -86.9% |
| Capital One Financi… (COF) | 100 | 127.1 | +27.1% |
| Synchrony Financial (SYF) | 100 | 167.2 | +67.2% |
| Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST) | 100 | 29.0 | -71.0% |
| LendingClub Corpora… (LC) | 100 | 108.1 | +8.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PGY vs COF vs SYF vs UPST vs LC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PGY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if efficiency is your priority.
- 6.5% ROA vs COF's 0.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.3%
COF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.58, yield 1.7%
- 205.6% 10Y total return vs SYF's 176.3%
- Beta 1.58, yield 1.7%, current ratio 0.15x
- 1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SYF's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
SYF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.25 vs UPST's 1.02
- NIM 15.5% vs UPST's 5.1%
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 9.6x)
- 18.6% margin vs COF's 3.5%
UPST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 58.9%, EPS growth 131.3%
- 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs SYF's -7.9%
LC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.36, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 466.38x
- +62.4% vs UPST's -37.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs SYF's -7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 9.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs COF's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.52 vs PGY's 3.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SYF's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.4% vs UPST's -37.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs COF's 0.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.3% |
PGY vs COF vs SYF vs UPST vs LC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PGY vs COF vs SYF vs UPST vs LC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYF leads in 3 of 6 categories
PGY leads 0 • COF leads 0 • UPST leads 0 • LC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SYF and LC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COF is the larger business by revenue, generating $69.3B annually — 64.4x UPST's $1.1B. SYF is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COF's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $69.3B | $19.1B | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $305M | $7.5B | $4.9B | $68M | $287M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $98M | $2.5B | $3.6B | $49M | $136M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $234M | $27.7B | $9.8B | -$146M | -$2.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +47.3% | +51.0% | +95.2% | +64.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +3.3% | +24.2% | +5.1% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +3.5% | +18.6% | +5.0% | +10.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +37.7% | +51.5% | -15.4% | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +191.4% | +22.1% | +20.1% | -169.2% | +3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SYF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, SYF trades at a 88% valuation discount to UPST's 64.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYF offers better value at 0.24x vs UPST's 4.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $119.2B | $25.7B | $2.8B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $112.8B | $25.9B | $4.0B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.67x | 47.77x | 7.97x | 64.44x | 14.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.49x | 9.76x | 7.99x | 14.69x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.24x | 4.49x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.54x | 14.95x | 5.05x | 50.13x | 2.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.01x | 1.72x | 1.35x | 2.58x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.32x | 0.92x | 1.58x | 3.90x | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.69x | 4.56x | 2.61x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PGY and LC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYF delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $2 for COF. LC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPST's 2.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PGY scores 7/9 vs UPST's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.2% | +2.4% | +21.4% | +6.6% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +1.7% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.8% | +1.3% | +10.8% | +1.7% | +17.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.5% | +1.4% | +12.3% | +2.4% | +3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 0.45x | 0.91x | 2.32x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $634M | -$6.4B | $209M | $1.2B | -$902M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $288M | $57.4B | $15.0B | $657M | $918M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $923M | $51.0B | $15.2B | $1.9B | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.14x | 1.13x | 1.66x | 0.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYF five years ago would be worth $17,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,325 for PGY. Over the past 12 months, LC leads with a +62.4% total return vs UPST's -37.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYF at 41.3% vs PGY's 16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.4% | -22.0% | -11.9% | -36.7% | -12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.8% | +4.7% | +39.9% | -37.6% | +62.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.2% | +124.7% | +181.9% | +116.7% | +142.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | +30.2% | +72.2% | -69.8% | +15.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.1% | +205.6% | +176.3% | -1.6% | -27.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.0% | +31.0% | +41.3% | +29.4% | +34.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SYF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYF is the less volatile stock with a 1.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PGY's 3.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SYF currently trades 83.4% from its 52-week high vs UPST's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.23x | 1.58x | 1.52x | 2.96x | 2.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.99 | $259.64 | $88.77 | $87.30 | $21.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.40 | $174.98 | $53.23 | $23.96 | $9.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.5% | +74.2% | +83.4% | +33.2% | +77.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.4 | 50.3 | 54.3 | 42.7 | 57.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 4.6M | 3.6M | 4.8M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — COF and SYF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PGY as "Buy", COF as "Buy", SYF as "Buy", UPST as "Buy", LC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 101.6% upside for PGY (target: $31) vs 22.4% for SYF (target: $91). For income investors, COF offers the higher dividend yield at 1.70% vs SYF's 1.61%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.25 | $267.18 | $90.55 | $45.17 | $22.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 56 | 41 | 22 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +1.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 4 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.27 | $1.19 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.4% | +11.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SYF leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
PGY vs COF vs SYF vs UPST vs LC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PGY or COF or SYF or UPST or LC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Upstart Holdings, Inc.
(UPST) is the stronger pick with 58. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for Synchrony Financial (SYF). Synchrony Financial (SYF) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (PGY) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PGY or COF or SYF or UPST or LC?
On trailing P/E, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the cheapest at 8.
0x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. at 64. 4x. On forward P/E, Synchrony Financial is actually cheaper at 8. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Synchrony Financial wins at 0. 25x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 02x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PGY or COF or SYF or UPST or LC?
Over the past 5 years, Synchrony Financial (SYF) delivered a total return of +72.
2%, compared to -86. 8% for Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (PGY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COF returned +205. 6% versus PGY's -87. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PGY or COF or SYF or UPST or LC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
52β versus Pagaya Technologies Ltd. 's 3. 23β — meaning PGY is approximately 113% more volatile than SYF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PGY or COF or SYF or UPST or LC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Upstart Holdings, Inc.
(UPST) is pulling ahead at 58. 9% versus -7. 9% for Synchrony Financial (SYF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingClub Corporation grew EPS 155. 6% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Capital One Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PGY or COF or SYF or UPST or LC?
Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
6% net margin versus 3. 5% for Capital One Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LC leads at 25. 0% versus 3. 3% for COF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPST leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PGY or COF or SYF or UPST or LC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 02x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Synchrony Financial (SYF) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 7x for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGY: 101. 6% to $31. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — PGY or COF or SYF or UPST or LC?
In this comparison, COF (1.
7% yield), SYF (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. PGY, UPST, LC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PGY or COF or SYF or UPST or LC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
6% yield, +176. 3% 10Y return). Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (PGY) carries a higher beta of 3. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYF: +176. 3%, PGY: -87. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PGY and COF and SYF and UPST and LC?
These companies operate in different sectors (PGY (Technology) and COF (Financial Services) and SYF (Financial Services) and UPST (Financial Services) and LC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PGY is a small-cap high-growth stock; COF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SYF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock; LC is a small-cap deep-value stock. COF, SYF pay a dividend while PGY, UPST, LC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.