Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PGY vs ENVA vs UPST vs WRLD vs OPRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
PGY vs ENVA vs UPST vs WRLD vs OPRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.28B | $4.30B | $2.78B | $753M | $263M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.30B | $3.15B | $1.08B | $565M | $637M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $98M | $327M | $49M | $43M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 50.1% | 95.2% | 70.0% | 63.7% |
| Operating Margin | 21.8% | 23.5% | 5.1% | 28.1% | 6.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 10.5x | 14.7x | 21.1x | 3.7x |
| Total Debt | $923M | $4.56B | $1.85B | $526M | $2.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $288M | $72M | $657M | $10M | $106M |
PGY vs ENVA vs UPST vs WRLD vs OPRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pagaya Technologies… (PGY) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
| Enova International… (ENVA) | 100 | 503.8 | +403.8% |
| Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST) | 100 | 26.6 | -73.4% |
| World Acceptance Co… (WRLD) | 100 | 114.4 | +14.4% |
| Oportun Financial C… (OPRT) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PGY vs ENVA vs UPST vs WRLD vs OPRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PGY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if efficiency is your priority.
- 6.5% ROA vs OPRT's 0.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.0%
ENVA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 20.3% 10Y total return vs WRLD's 266.2%
- +87.8% vs UPST's -37.6%
UPST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 58.9%, EPS growth 131.3%
- 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5%
WRLD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.27
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, current ratio 12.55x
- PEG 0.59 vs UPST's 1.02
- Beta 1.27, current ratio 12.55x
OPRT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (3.7x vs 14.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.7x vs 14.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.9% margin vs OPRT's 4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs PGY's 3.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.8% vs UPST's -37.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs OPRT's 0.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.0% |
PGY vs ENVA vs UPST vs WRLD vs OPRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PGY vs ENVA vs UPST vs WRLD vs OPRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WRLD leads in 2 of 6 categories
OPRT leads 1 • ENVA leads 1 • PGY leads 0 • UPST leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WRLD leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 5.6x WRLD's $565M. WRLD is the more profitable business, keeping 15.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPRT's 4.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $3.2B | $1.1B | $565M | $637M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $305M | $815M | $68M | $61M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $98M | $327M | $49M | $43M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $234M | $1.9B | -$146M | $252M | $409M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +50.1% | +95.2% | +70.0% | +63.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +23.5% | +5.1% | +28.1% | +6.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +9.8% | +5.0% | +15.9% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +56.2% | -15.4% | +44.3% | +61.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +191.4% | +28.6% | -169.2% | -107.8% | -76.2% |
Valuation Metrics
OPRT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, WRLD trades at a 86% valuation discount to UPST's 64.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WRLD offers better value at 0.26x vs UPST's 4.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $4.3B | $2.8B | $753M | $263M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $8.8B | $4.0B | $1.3B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.67x | 14.90x | 64.44x | 9.17x | 10.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.49x | 10.49x | 14.69x | 21.15x | 3.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.49x | 0.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.54x | 11.26x | 50.13x | 7.53x | 34.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.01x | 1.37x | 2.58x | 1.33x | 0.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.32x | 3.40x | 3.90x | 1.87x | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.69x | 2.43x | — | 3.01x | 0.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WRLD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVA delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $5 for OPRT. WRLD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OPRT's 7.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRLD scores 9/9 vs UPST's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.2% | +24.9% | +6.6% | +10.8% | +4.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +5.2% | +1.7% | +4.0% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.8% | +10.4% | +1.7% | +12.1% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.5% | +13.5% | +2.4% | +16.3% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 3.41x | 2.32x | 1.20x | 7.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $634M | $4.5B | $1.2B | $516M | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $288M | $72M | $657M | $10M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $923M | $4.6B | $1.9B | $526M | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 79.01x | 1.66x | 1.13x | 0.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENVA five years ago would be worth $46,811 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,325 for PGY. Over the past 12 months, ENVA leads with a +87.8% total return vs UPST's -37.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVA at 59.0% vs WRLD's 9.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.4% | +6.5% | -36.7% | +5.5% | +13.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.8% | +87.8% | -37.6% | +12.8% | +3.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.2% | +302.0% | +116.7% | +32.8% | +33.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | +368.1% | -69.8% | +11.3% | -73.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.1% | +2034.9% | -1.6% | +266.2% | -64.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.0% | +59.0% | +29.4% | +9.9% | +10.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ENVA and WRLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WRLD is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PGY's 3.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENVA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs UPST's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.36x | 1.48x | 2.96x | 1.27x | 2.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.99 | $176.68 | $87.30 | $185.48 | $7.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.40 | $89.00 | $23.96 | $110.00 | $4.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.5% | +97.6% | +33.2% | +80.6% | +72.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.4 | 65.4 | 42.7 | 53.8 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 227K | 4.8M | 160K | 510K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PGY as "Buy", ENVA as "Buy", UPST as "Buy", WRLD as "Hold", OPRT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 101.6% upside for PGY (target: $31) vs 15.7% for ENVA (target: $200).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.25 | $199.50 | $45.17 | — | $10.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 10 | 22 | 10 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% | 0.0% | +7.2% | 0.0% |
WRLD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPRT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PGY vs ENVA vs UPST vs WRLD vs OPRT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PGY or ENVA or UPST or WRLD or OPRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Upstart Holdings, Inc.
(UPST) is the stronger pick with 58. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (PGY) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PGY or ENVA or UPST or WRLD or OPRT?
On trailing P/E, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. at 64. 4x. On forward P/E, Oportun Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 3. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: World Acceptance Corporation wins at 0. 59x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 02x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PGY or ENVA or UPST or WRLD or OPRT?
Over the past 5 years, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) delivered a total return of +368. 1%, compared to -86. 8% for Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (PGY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENVA returned +20. 3% versus PGY's -87. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PGY or ENVA or UPST or WRLD or OPRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
27β versus Pagaya Technologies Ltd. 's 3. 36β — meaning PGY is approximately 165% more volatile than WRLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 120% versus 7% for Oportun Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PGY or ENVA or UPST or WRLD or OPRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Upstart Holdings, Inc.
(UPST) is pulling ahead at 58. 9% versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Upstart Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 131. 3% year-over-year, compared to 23. 6% for World Acceptance Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PGY or ENVA or UPST or WRLD or OPRT?
World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus 4. 0% for Oportun Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WRLD leads at 28. 1% versus 5. 1% for UPST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPST leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PGY or ENVA or UPST or WRLD or OPRT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 59x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 02x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT) trades at 3. 7x forward P/E versus 21. 1x for World Acceptance Corporation — 17. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGY: 101. 6% to $31. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — PGY or ENVA or UPST or WRLD or OPRT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PGY or ENVA or UPST or WRLD or OPRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
27), +266. 2% 10Y return). Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (PGY) carries a higher beta of 3. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WRLD: +266. 2%, PGY: -87. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PGY and ENVA and UPST and WRLD and OPRT?
These companies operate in different sectors (PGY (Technology) and ENVA (Financial Services) and UPST (Financial Services) and WRLD (Financial Services) and OPRT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PGY is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock; WRLD is a small-cap deep-value stock; OPRT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.