Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PHUN vs BRZE vs TWLO vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
PHUN vs BRZE vs TWLO vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $41M | $2.31B | $29.86B | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $738M | $5.30B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-131M | $104M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 67.1% | 48.8% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -7.4% | -19.6% | 4.7% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 35.7x | 36.3x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $932K | $83M | $1.08B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $113M | $124M | $682M | $30.71B |
PHUN vs BRZE vs TWLO vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phunware, Inc. (PHUN) | 100 | 1.4 | -98.6% |
| Braze, Inc. (BRZE) | 100 | 29.7 | -70.3% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 68.9 | -31.1% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 280.5 | +180.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PHUN vs BRZE vs TWLO vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PHUN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BRZE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 24.4%, EPS growth -19.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.6%
- 24.4% revenue growth vs PHUN's -34.0%
TWLO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.2%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs TWLO's 5.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
- Beta 1.26, yield 0.2%, current ratio 2.01x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.4% revenue growth vs PHUN's -34.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.6x vs 35.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs PHUN's -5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs PHUN's 2.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs BRZE's -30.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs BRZE's -12.9%, ROIC 25.1% vs -20.5% |
PHUN vs BRZE vs TWLO vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PHUN vs BRZE vs TWLO vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories
PHUN leads 0 • BRZE leads 0 • TWLO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BRZE and TWLO and GOOGL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 179281.3x PHUN's $2M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PHUN's -5.1%. On growth, BRZE holds the edge at +27.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $738M | $5.3B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | -$131M | $415M | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$131M | $104M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $61M | $1.0B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +67.1% | +48.8% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | -19.6% | +4.7% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | -17.8% | +2.0% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +8.2% | +19.0% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.5% | +27.9% | +20.0% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.0% | -70.6% | +3.8% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BRZE and GOOGL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.8x trailing earnings, GOOGL trades at a 96% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GOOGL's 32.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 77.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41M | $2.3B | $29.9B | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$71M | $2.3B | $30.3B | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.15x | -18.52x | 938.43x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.72x | 36.33x | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 77.16x | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.79x | 3.13x | 5.89x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.21x | 3.91x | 4.03x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 37.34x | 28.91x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-23 for BRZE. PHUN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOGL's 0.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWLO scores 7/9 vs BRZE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.6% | -22.8% | +1.3% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.8% | -12.9% | +1.1% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -20.5% | +1.6% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.2% | -23.4% | +1.9% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.13x | 0.14x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$112M | -$42M | $399M | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $113M | $124M | $682M | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $932,000 | $83M | $1.1B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -196.80x | — | — | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $299 for PHUN. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs BRZE's -30.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs PHUN's -59.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.2% | -30.6% | +42.4% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.4% | -30.7% | +90.3% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | -20.7% | +259.4% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | -75.8% | -35.8% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -75.8% | +584.5% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.5% | -7.4% | +53.2% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GOOGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOGL is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PHUN's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs PHUN's 52.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.37x | 1.27x | 1.51x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.88 | $37.67 | $201.39 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.56 | $15.26 | $91.84 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.1% | +60.0% | +97.9% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.6 | 47.6 | 78.4 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 140K | 3.0M | 2.2M | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BRZE as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 87.8% upside for BRZE (target: $42) vs -6.0% for TWLO (target: $185). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $42.44 | $185.17 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 | 52 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.9% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
PHUN vs BRZE vs TWLO vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PHUN or BRZE or TWLO or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Braze, Inc.
(BRZE) is the stronger pick with 24. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -34. 0% for Phunware, Inc. (PHUN). Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (29. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Braze, Inc. (BRZE) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PHUN or BRZE or TWLO or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the cheapest at 36. 8x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, Alphabet Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PHUN or BRZE or TWLO or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -97. 0% for Phunware, Inc. (PHUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus PHUN's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PHUN or BRZE or TWLO or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Phunware, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning PHUN is approximately 88% more volatile than GOOGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Phunware, Inc. (PHUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 14% for Alphabet Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PHUN or BRZE or TWLO or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Braze, Inc.
(BRZE) is pulling ahead at 24. 4% versus -34. 0% for Phunware, Inc. (PHUN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Twilio Inc. grew EPS 131. 8% year-over-year, compared to -19. 6% for Braze, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRZE leads at 27. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PHUN or BRZE or TWLO or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -323. 5% for Phunware, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -435. 5% for PHUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRZE leads at 67. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PHUN or BRZE or TWLO or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) trades at 29. 6x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRZE: 87. 8% to $42. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — PHUN or BRZE or TWLO or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. PHUN, BRZE, TWLO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PHUN or BRZE or TWLO or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). Phunware, Inc. (PHUN) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +996. 1%, PHUN: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PHUN and BRZE and TWLO and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (PHUN (Technology) and BRZE (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PHUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BRZE is a small-cap high-growth stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.