Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PLMR vs RLI vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RYAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Diversified
Insurance - Specialty
PLMR vs RLI vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RYAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $3.01B | $4.56B | $7.15B | $33.67B | $4.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $874M | $1.90B | $1.92B | $19.93B | $3.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $197M | $395M | $527M | $4.40B | $132M |
| Gross Margin | 56.2% | 37.5% | 36.9% | 37.2% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 29.0% | 26.7% | 27.2% | 25.0% | 16.6% |
| Forward P/E | 11.8x | 17.8x | 14.7x | 10.0x | 15.2x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $100M | $224M | $2.73B | $3.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $107M | $52M | $163M | $993M | $158M |
PLMR vs RLI vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RYAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palomar Holdings, I… (PLMR) | 100 | 139.2 | +39.2% |
| RLI Corp. (RLI) | 100 | 90.5 | -9.5% |
| Kinsale Capital Gro… (KNSL) | 100 | 170.7 | +70.7% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 240.5 | +140.5% |
| Ryan Specialty Hold… (RYAN) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLMR vs RLI vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RYAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLMR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 58.2%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- PEG 0.12 vs RLI's 0.88
- 58.2% revenue growth vs RLI's 6.3%
RLI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 5.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KNSL's 0.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
KNSL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 16.1% 10Y total return vs ACGL's 324.0%
- Combined ratio 0.7 vs RYAN's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting)
- 9.1% ROA vs RYAN's 1.3%, ROIC 26.6% vs 10.8%
ACGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 15.2x)
- Beta 0.02 vs KNSL's 0.29, lower leverage
- +2.0% vs RYAN's -54.6%
RYAN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.23, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.23, yield 0.7%, current ratio 7.51x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.2% revenue growth vs RLI's 6.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 15.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs RYAN's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs KNSL's 0.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KNSL's 0.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.0% vs RYAN's -54.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs RYAN's 1.3%, ROIC 26.6% vs 10.8% |
PLMR vs RLI vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RYAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PLMR vs RLI vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RYAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACGL leads in 2 of 6 categories
PLMR leads 0 • RLI leads 0 • KNSL leads 0 • RYAN leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PLMR and KNSL and RYAN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 22.8x PLMR's $874M. KNSL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RYAN's 4.2%. On growth, PLMR holds the edge at +62.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $874M | $1.9B | $1.9B | $19.9B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $265M | $512M | $533M | $5.2B | $743M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $197M | $395M | $527M | $4.4B | $132M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $406M | $551M | $1.0B | $6.1B | $555M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.2% | +37.5% | +36.9% | +37.2% | +69.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +26.7% | +27.2% | +25.0% | +16.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.6% | +20.8% | +27.5% | +22.1% | +4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +46.4% | +29.0% | +52.9% | +30.7% | +17.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.8% | +4.0% | +10.2% | +7.3% | +15.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.7% | -11.8% | -100.0% | +39.0% | +2.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ACGL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, ACGL trades at a 88% valuation discount to RYAN's 67.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PLMR offers better value at 0.16x vs RLI's 0.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $4.6B | $7.2B | $33.7B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $4.6B | $7.2B | $35.4B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.84x | 11.38x | 14.26x | 8.13x | 67.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.76x | 17.77x | 14.74x | 10.04x | 15.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.16x | 0.56x | 0.35x | 0.29x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.10x | 8.76x | 11.27x | 6.85x | 8.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.44x | 2.42x | 3.82x | 1.69x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.31x | 2.57x | 3.67x | 1.47x | 7.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.36x | 7.49x | 7.22x | 5.50x | 7.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PLMR and KNSL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KNSL delivers a 28.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $11 for RYAN. PLMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RYAN's 2.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RLI scores 8/9 vs RYAN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.8% | +22.0% | +28.0% | +19.0% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | +6.6% | +9.1% | +5.9% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.5% | +22.8% | +26.6% | +15.4% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +9.0% | +14.2% | +11.6% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.06x | 0.11x | 0.11x | 2.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$100M | $48M | $61M | $1.7B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $107M | $52M | $163M | $993M | $158M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $100M | $224M | $2.7B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 649.06x | 80.31x | 47.02x | 34.86x | 2.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,931 for RLI. Over the past 12 months, ACGL leads with a +2.0% total return vs RYAN's -54.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLMR at 30.8% vs RYAN's -8.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.8% | -20.3% | -21.2% | +0.7% | -37.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.6% | -29.3% | -32.7% | +2.0% | -54.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.0% | -18.2% | -6.9% | +30.7% | -23.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.0% | +9.3% | +85.2% | +144.0% | +20.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +498.1% | +105.0% | +1606.7% | +324.0% | +20.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.8% | -6.5% | -2.3% | +9.3% | -8.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RLI and ACGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RLI is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNSL's 0.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACGL currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs RYAN's 43.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.18x | -0.05x | 0.25x | -0.01x | 0.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $175.85 | $77.24 | $512.76 | $103.39 | $72.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $107.75 | $48.66 | $293.78 | $82.45 | $29.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +64.2% | +60.2% | +91.4% | +43.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.9 | 23.5 | 26.3 | 46.3 | 28.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 234K | 675K | 256K | 1.9M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RLI and KNSL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLMR as "Buy", RLI as "Hold", KNSL as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy", RYAN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for KNSL (target: $433) vs -2.9% for PLMR (target: $110). For income investors, RLI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.28% vs KNSL's 0.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $110.25 | $56.33 | $433.00 | $104.00 | $41.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 12 | 13 | 34 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.3% | +0.2% | +0.0% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.62 | $0.68 | $0.02 | $0.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% | +1.3% | +5.6% | +0.1% |
ACGL leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
PLMR vs RLI vs KNSL vs ACGL vs RYAN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLMR or RLI or KNSL or ACGL or RYAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the stronger pick with 58. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 3% for RLI Corp. (RLI). Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLMR or RLI or KNSL or ACGL or RYAN?
On trailing P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. at 67. 5x. On forward P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Palomar Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus RLI Corp. 's 0. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLMR or RLI or KNSL or ACGL or RYAN?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +144. 0%, compared to +9. 3% for RLI Corp. (RLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KNSL returned +1585% versus RYAN's +18. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLMR or RLI or KNSL or ACGL or RYAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RLI Corp.
(RLI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 05β versus Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. 's 0. 25β — meaning KNSL is approximately -606% more volatile than RLI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLMR or RLI or KNSL or ACGL or RYAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is pulling ahead at 58. 2% versus 6. 3% for RLI Corp. (RLI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Palomar Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 60. 0% year-over-year, compared to -33. 8% for Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLMR leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLMR or RLI or KNSL or ACGL or RYAN?
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus 2. 1% for Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KNSL leads at 33. 8% versus 20. 5% for RYAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RYAN leads at 90. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLMR or RLI or KNSL or ACGL or RYAN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus RLI Corp. 's 0. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 17. 8x for RLI Corp. — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KNSL: 40. 2% to $433. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLMR or RLI or KNSL or ACGL or RYAN?
In this comparison, RLI (5.
3% yield), RYAN (0. 7% yield), KNSL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. PLMR, ACGL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PLMR or RLI or KNSL or ACGL or RYAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 25), +1585% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KNSL: +1585%, PLMR: +496. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLMR and RLI and KNSL and ACGL and RYAN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; RLI is a small-cap deep-value stock; KNSL is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; RYAN is a small-cap high-growth stock. RLI, RYAN pay a dividend while PLMR, KNSL, ACGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.