Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PLTR vs S vs DDOG vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
PLTR vs S vs DDOG vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $306.57B | $4.83B | $46.77B | $3.07T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.22B | $1.00B | $3.43B | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.28B | $-451M | $108M | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 84.1% | 74.1% | 79.9% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 38.1% | -32.1% | -1.3% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 104.6x | 80.7x | 67.0x | 24.9x |
| Total Debt | $229M | $0.00 | $1.54B | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.42B | $170M | $401M | $30.24B |
PLTR vs S vs DDOG vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palantir Technologi… (PLTR) | 100 | 507.5 | +407.5% |
| SentinelOne, Inc. (S) | 100 | 36.1 | -63.9% |
| Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 152.8 | +52.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLTR vs S vs DDOG vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 56.2%, EPS growth 231.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.9%
- 13.1% 10Y total return vs MSFT's 7.7%
- 56.2% revenue growth vs MSFT's 14.9%
- 43.7% margin vs S's -45.0%
S lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DDOG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +35.5% vs S's -18.2%
MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- Lower P/E (24.9x vs 67.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.2% revenue growth vs MSFT's 14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.9x vs 67.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.7% margin vs S's -45.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs PLTR's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 19-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.5% vs S's -18.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.4% ROA vs S's -18.8%, ROIC 22.3% vs -17.4% |
PLTR vs S vs DDOG vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PLTR vs S vs DDOG vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLTR leads in 2 of 6 categories
MSFT leads 1 • S leads 0 • DDOG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 317.9x S's $1.0B. PLTR is the more profitable business, keeping 43.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to S's -45.0%. On growth, PLTR holds the edge at +84.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.2B | $1.0B | $3.4B | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | -$283M | $79M | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.3B | -$451M | $108M | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.7B | $58M | $1.0B | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.1% | +74.1% | +79.9% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.1% | -32.1% | -1.3% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | -45.0% | +3.1% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +51.5% | +5.8% | +29.2% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.7% | +20.2% | +29.2% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | -50.0% | 0.0% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — S and MSFT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.3x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 94% valuation discount to DDOG's 479.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MSFT's 19.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DDOG's 612.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $306.6B | $4.8B | $46.8B | $3.07T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $305.4B | $4.7B | $47.9B | $3.16T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 212.36x | -11.19x | 479.03x | 30.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 104.56x | 80.73x | 66.99x | 24.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.61x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 212.04x | — | 612.92x | 19.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 68.50x | 4.82x | 13.65x | 10.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 45.83x | 3.52x | 14.00x | 8.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 145.94x | 63.58x | 46.74x | 42.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PLTR and MSFT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-30 for S. PLTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DDOG's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLTR scores 8/9 vs S's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.7% | -29.8% | +2.9% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +26.4% | -18.8% | +1.6% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.3% | -17.4% | -0.8% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.6% | -18.5% | -1.0% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — | 0.41x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.2B | -$170M | $1.1B | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $170M | $401M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $229M | $0 | $1.5B | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 4.47x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLTR five years ago would be worth $66,594 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,607 for S. Over the past 12 months, DDOG leads with a +35.5% total return vs S's -18.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLTR at 158.6% vs S's -4.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.3% | +4.7% | +7.4% | -12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | -18.2% | +35.5% | -3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1628.5% | -12.3% | +83.0% | +37.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +565.9% | -63.9% | +101.4% | +71.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1308.3% | -63.9% | +282.7% | +768.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +158.6% | -4.3% | +22.3% | +11.1% |
Risk & Volatility
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLTR's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSFT currently trades 74.5% from its 52-week high vs PLTR's 64.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 1.30x | 1.40x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $207.52 | $21.40 | $201.69 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $105.32 | $11.81 | $98.01 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.5% | +71.6% | +71.3% | +74.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.9 | 66.7 | 69.6 | 52.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 46.4M | 7.6M | 4.6M | 32.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLTR as "Hold", S as "Buy", DDOG as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.4% upside for PLTR (target: $195) vs 21.5% for DDOG (target: $175). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $194.53 | $18.68 | $174.63 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 34 | 47 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +4.1% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
PLTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MSFT leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
PLTR vs S vs DDOG vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLTR or S or DDOG or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the stronger pick with 56. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 9% for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 3x trailing P/E (24. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SentinelOne, Inc. (S) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLTR or S or DDOG or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
3x versus Datadog, Inc. at 479. 0x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 24. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLTR or S or DDOG or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) delivered a total return of +565. 9%, compared to -63. 9% for SentinelOne, Inc. (S). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLTR returned +1308% versus S's -63. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLTR or S or DDOG or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Palantir Technologies Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning PLTR is approximately 115% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 41% for Datadog, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLTR or S or DDOG or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is pulling ahead at 56. 2% versus 14. 9% for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Palantir Technologies Inc. grew EPS 231. 6% year-over-year, compared to -48. 9% for SentinelOne, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, S leads at 33. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLTR or S or DDOG or MSFT?
Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 3% net margin versus -45. 0% for SentinelOne, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -32. 1% for S. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLTR leads at 82. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLTR or S or DDOG or MSFT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 24.
9x forward P/E versus 104. 6x for Palantir Technologies Inc. — 79. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLTR: 45. 4% to $194. 53.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLTR or S or DDOG or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. PLTR, S, DDOG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PLTR or S or DDOG or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +768. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +768. 1%, S: -63. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLTR and S and DDOG and MSFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLTR is a large-cap high-growth stock; S is a small-cap high-growth stock; DDOG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while PLTR, S, DDOG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.