REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PMTU vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
PMTU vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $2.22B | $995M | $9.62B | $16.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $957M | $650M | $3.46B | $6.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $132M | $135M | $838M | $2.03B |
| Gross Margin | 49.5% | 59.3% | 100.0% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | 35.7% | 41.0% | 107.1% | 102.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.3x | 7.1x | 6.9x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $19.09B | $10.99B | $64M | $111.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $272M | $213M | $505M | $2.04B |
PMTU vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PennyMac Mortgage I… (PMTU) | 100 | 104.1 | +4.1% |
| MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) | 100 | 101.5 | +1.5% |
| AGNC Investment Cor… (AGNC) | 100 | 113.6 | +13.6% |
| Annaly Capital Mana… (NLY) | 100 | 119.0 | +19.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PMTU vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PMTU is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.55 vs MFA's 0.77
MFA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 18.4%
- Beta 0.77, yield 18.4%, current ratio 2.18x
- 18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PMTU's 6.3%
AGNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 384.7%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.4%
- 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NLY's 5.4%
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 7.5x)
- +39.4% vs PMTU's +8.4%
NLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 35.5% 10Y total return vs PMTU's 26.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, current ratio 0.03x
- 30.3% margin vs PMTU's 13.8%
- 1.7% ROA vs PMTU's 0.7%, ROIC 6.4% vs 0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NLY's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 7.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.3% margin vs PMTU's 13.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs MFA's 0.77 | |
| Dividends | 18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PMTU's 6.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs PMTU's +8.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs PMTU's 0.7%, ROIC 6.4% vs 0.4% |
PMTU vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PMTU vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFA leads in 2 of 6 categories
AGNC leads 1 • PMTU leads 1 • NLY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.7B annually — 10.3x MFA's $650M. NLY is the more profitable business, keeping 30.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PMTU's 13.8%. On growth, AGNC holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $957M | $650M | $3.5B | $6.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $342M | $268M | $3.7B | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $132M | $135M | $838M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9.1B | $91M | $604M | -$222M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.5% | +59.3% | +100.0% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | +41.0% | +107.1% | +102.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +20.7% | +24.2% | +30.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.6% | +14.0% | +17.5% | -3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.2% | +118.9% | +2.5% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -103.0% | +84.6% | +79.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MFA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.8x trailing earnings, MFA trades at a 77% valuation discount to PMTU's 25.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AGNC's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PMTU's 224.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $995M | $9.6B | $16.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.0B | $11.8B | $9.2B | $125.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.72x | 5.80x | 11.53x | 7.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.34x | 7.11x | 6.87x | 7.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.87x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 224.30x | 17.07x | 2.42x | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.16x | 1.14x | 1.97x | 2.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 0.56x | 0.86x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.06x | 111.86x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AGNC and NLY each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NLY delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $7 for PMTU. AGNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PMTU's 10.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MFA scores 5/9 vs PMTU's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +7.4% | +7.3% | +14.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.4% | +4.4% | +34.0% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | +5.8% | +4.9% | +19.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 10.12x | 6.01x | 0.01x | 6.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18.8B | $10.8B | -$441M | $109.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $272M | $213M | $505M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.1B | $11.0B | $64M | $111.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.11x | 1.34x | 1.32x | 1.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AGNC and NLY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PMTU five years ago would be worth $12,610 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,782 for AGNC. Over the past 12 months, AGNC leads with a +39.4% total return vs PMTU's +8.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NLY at 17.0% vs PMTU's 8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.2% | +6.1% | +2.5% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.4% | +19.2% | +39.4% | +31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.1% | +34.1% | +58.3% | +60.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.1% | -0.6% | -2.2% | +1.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.1% | +7.8% | +46.9% | +35.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.0% | +10.3% | +16.5% | +17.0% |
Risk & Volatility
PMTU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PMTU is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MFA's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PMTU currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs AGNC's 87.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.77x | 0.74x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.26 | $10.57 | $12.19 | $24.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.06 | $8.78 | $8.65 | $18.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +92.2% | +87.9% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.3 | 43.8 | 52.1 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 1.4M | 18.2M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
MFA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MFA as "Hold", AGNC as "Hold", NLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.4% upside for NLY (target: $25) vs 3.8% for AGNC (target: $11). For income investors, MFA offers the higher dividend yield at 18.36% vs PMTU's 6.29%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.25 | $11.13 | $24.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 | 35 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.3% | +18.4% | +14.7% | +13.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.60 | $1.79 | $1.58 | $2.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
MFA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). AGNC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
PMTU vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PMTU or MFA or AGNC or NLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is the stronger pick with 384. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY). MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PMTU or MFA or AGNC or NLY?
On trailing P/E, MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust at 25. 7x. On forward P/E, AGNC Investment Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PMTU or MFA or AGNC or NLY?
Over the past 5 years, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMTU) delivered a total return of +26.
1%, compared to -2. 2% for AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGNC returned +46. 9% versus MFA's +7. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PMTU or MFA or AGNC or NLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMTU) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus MFA Financial, Inc. 's 0. 77β — meaning MFA is approximately 41% more volatile than PMTU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 10% for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PMTU or MFA or AGNC or NLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is pulling ahead at 384. 7% versus 5. 4% for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGNC Investment Corp. grew EPS 1760% year-over-year, compared to -27. 7% for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGNC leads at 26. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PMTU or MFA or AGNC or NLY?
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
(NLY) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 3% net margin versus 12. 4% for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust — meaning it keeps 30. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NLY leads at 102. 6% versus 9. 1% for PMTU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGNC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PMTU or MFA or AGNC or NLY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NLY: 9. 4% to $24. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PMTU or MFA or AGNC or NLY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) offers the highest yield at 18. 4%, versus 6. 3% for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMTU).
09Is PMTU or MFA or AGNC or NLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMTU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 6. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PMTU: +26. 1%, MFA: +7. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PMTU and MFA and AGNC and NLY?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PMTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; MFA is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NLY is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.