Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PRAX vs LGND vs PTCT vs FOLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
PRAX vs LGND vs PTCT vs FOLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $9.63B | $4.13B | $5.35B | $4.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-92K | $251M | $827M | $634M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-327M | $49M | $-187M | $-27M |
| Gross Margin | — | 85.9% | 49.7% | 87.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.0% | -8.3% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.6x | 8.3x | 40.6x |
| Total Debt | $110K | $7M | $492M | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $357M | $72M | $985M | $214M |
PRAX vs LGND vs PTCT vs FOLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 100 | 255.1 | +155.1% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 123.6 | +23.6% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 81.1 | -18.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRAX vs LGND vs PTCT vs FOLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.7% vs PTCT's +58.2%
LGND has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 8.93x
- 19.3% margin vs PTCT's -22.6%
- 3.3% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC -2.3% vs -65.0%
PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs LGND's 73.0%
- 114.5% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 40.6x)
FOLD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.63
- Beta 0.63, current ratio 2.84x
- Beta 0.63 vs PRAX's 1.55
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 40.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% margin vs PTCT's -22.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs PTCT's +58.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC -2.3% vs -65.0% |
PRAX vs LGND vs PTCT vs FOLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PRAX vs LGND vs PTCT vs FOLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LGND leads in 1 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • FOLD leads 1 • PTCT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGND leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PTCT and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $827M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. LGND is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTCT's -22.6%. On growth, LGND holds the edge at +122.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$92,000 | $251M | $827M | $634M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$357M | $52M | -$37M | $40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$327M | $49M | -$187M | -$27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$283M | $31M | -$229M | $30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +85.9% | +49.7% | +87.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +7.0% | -8.3% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +19.3% | -22.6% | -4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +12.2% | -27.7% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +122.8% | -76.8% | +23.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +15.6% | -100.3% | -89.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LGND and PTCT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LGND's 322.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.6B | $4.1B | $5.3B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.3B | $4.1B | $4.9B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -24.72x | -956.05x | 8.29x | -164.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.65x | — | 40.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 322.10x | 5.42x | 114.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 24.74x | 3.09x | 7.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.54x | 4.63x | — | 16.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.41x | 7.61x | 152.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LGND and PTCT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LGND delivers a 5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -43.0% | +5.1% | — | -12.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.2% | +3.3% | -6.8% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -65.0% | -2.3% | — | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.3% | -2.7% | +55.9% | +5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.01x | — | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$357M | -$65M | -$492M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $357M | $72M | $985M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $110,000 | $7M | $492M | $483M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 22.69x | -1.67x | 1.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LGND five years ago would be worth $16,102 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,918 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs PTCT's +58.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs PTCT's 5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.4% | +10.6% | -16.0% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +775.0% | +99.1% | +58.2% | +137.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1976.5% | +171.6% | +16.1% | +19.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.8% | +61.0% | +60.3% | +48.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.1% | +73.0% | +733.2% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +174.9% | +39.5% | +5.1% | +6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs PTCT's 73.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 0.99x | 1.13x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $356.00 | $247.38 | $87.50 | $14.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.18 | $98.89 | $37.94 | $5.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.6% | +85.0% | +73.7% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 59.3 | 45.3 | 72.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 378K | 226K | 1.0M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRAX as "Buy", LGND as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $544.40 | $267.75 | $89.67 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 17 | 26 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LGND leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PRAX vs LGND vs PTCT vs FOLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRAX or LGND or PTCT or FOLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRAX or LGND or PTCT or FOLD?
On forward P/E, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated is actually cheaper at 23.
6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRAX or LGND or PTCT or FOLD?
Over the past 5 years, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) delivered a total return of +61.
0%, compared to -20. 8% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +733. 2% versus PRAX's -20. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRAX or LGND or PTCT or FOLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 145% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRAX or LGND or PTCT or FOLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -107. 5% for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRAX or LGND or PTCT or FOLD?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -4. 3% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -13. 5% for LGND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRAX or LGND or PTCT or FOLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) trades at 23.
6x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 17. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 63. 3% to $544. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRAX or LGND or PTCT or FOLD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PRAX or LGND or PTCT or FOLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +119. 2% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRAX and LGND and PTCT and FOLD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LGND is a small-cap high-growth stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.