Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PRCH vs HIFS vs ICE vs NBTB vs NWBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PRCH vs HIFS vs ICE vs NBTB vs NWBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.23B | $626M | $88.45B | $2.35B | $2.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $483M | $217M | $12.64B | $867M | $877M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $45M | $3.30B | $169M | $126M |
| Gross Margin | 72.4% | 30.1% | 61.9% | 72.1% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 16.8% | 38.7% | 25.3% | 18.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.4x | 19.5x | 10.8x | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $393M | $1.50B | $20.28B | $327M | $446M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $352M | $837M | $185M | $234M |
PRCH vs HIFS vs ICE vs NBTB vs NWBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porch Group, Inc. (PRCH) | 100 | 115.1 | +15.1% |
| Hingham Institution… (HIFS) | 100 | 174.8 | +74.8% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 160.6 | +60.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRCH vs HIFS vs ICE vs NBTB vs NWBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRCH plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
HIFS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.2%
- 225.3% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
- 26.1% margin vs PRCH's -1.8%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive and bank quality.
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- NIM 3.1% vs HIFS's 1.0%
NWBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 16.5%
- PEG 1.24 vs ICE's 2.19
- 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs ICE's 7.5%
- Lower P/E (10.2x vs 19.5x), PEG 1.24 vs 2.19
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs ICE's 7.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.2x vs 19.5x), PEG 1.24 vs 2.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.1% margin vs PRCH's -1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs PRCH's 2.22, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs NWBI's 5.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.3% vs ICE's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs PRCH's -1.1%, ROIC 7.5% vs 9.9% |
PRCH vs HIFS vs ICE vs NBTB vs NWBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PRCH vs HIFS vs ICE vs NBTB vs NWBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories
NWBI leads 1 • PRCH leads 1 • HIFS leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 58.1x HIFS's $217M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRCH's -1.8%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $483M | $217M | $12.6B | $867M | $877M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | $62M | $6.5B | $241M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $45M | $3.3B | $169M | $126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $72M | $30M | $4.3B | $225M | $142M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.4% | +30.1% | +61.9% | +72.1% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +16.8% | +38.7% | +25.3% | +18.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +13.0% | +26.1% | +19.5% | +14.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +5.4% | +33.9% | +25.2% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.6% | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -157.1% | +195.1% | +23.1% | +39.5% | +19.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NWBI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 50% valuation discount to ICE's 27.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NWBI offers better value at 1.83x vs ICE's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $626M | $88.4B | $2.4B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $1.8B | $107.9B | $2.5B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -348.15x | 22.33x | 27.06x | 13.53x | 15.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.43x | 19.48x | 10.80x | 10.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.05x | 1.92x | 1.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.52x | 47.53x | 16.71x | 10.35x | 13.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.56x | 2.88x | 7.00x | 2.71x | 2.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 52.25x | 1.46x | 3.08x | 1.21x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.71x | 53.27x | 20.62x | 10.75x | 14.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-61 for PRCH. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRCH's 17.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs HIFS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.9% | +9.8% | +11.6% | +9.5% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +1.0% | +2.3% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +1.4% | +7.5% | +7.9% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +2.2% | +9.5% | +2.4% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 17.55x | 3.47x | 0.70x | 0.17x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $340M | $1.1B | $19.4B | $142M | $213M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $352M | $837M | $185M | $234M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $393M | $1.5B | $20.3B | $327M | $446M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.35x | 0.44x | 6.53x | 1.05x | 0.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRCH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ICE five years ago would be worth $14,335 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,931 for PRCH. Over the past 12 months, NWBI leads with a +18.3% total return vs ICE's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRCH at 133.5% vs ICE's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.3% | +6.3% | -2.1% | +9.3% | +18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.9% | +14.4% | -10.4% | +9.0% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1173.1% | +61.9% | +50.8% | +54.1% | +56.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.7% | -1.9% | +43.4% | +29.9% | +26.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.9% | +142.5% | +225.3% | +102.2% | +52.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +133.5% | +17.4% | +14.7% | +15.5% | +16.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICE and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRCH's 2.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWBI currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs PRCH's 58.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.22x | 1.25x | 0.33x | 0.89x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.44 | $338.00 | $189.35 | $46.92 | $14.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.36 | $220.76 | $143.17 | $39.20 | $11.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.0% | +84.9% | +82.5% | +96.1% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.0 | 51.0 | 38.8 | 57.3 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 51K | 3.0M | 236K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ICE and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRCH as "Buy", ICE as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", NWBI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 77.3% upside for PRCH (target: $20) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.42% vs HIFS's 0.87%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | — | $195.71 | $46.00 | $14.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | — | 36 | 10 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | +1.2% | +3.2% | +5.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 14 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.50 | $1.93 | $1.43 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NWBI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PRCH vs HIFS vs ICE vs NBTB vs NWBI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRCH or HIFS or ICE or NBTB or NWBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 5% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Porch Group, Inc. (PRCH) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRCH or HIFS or ICE or NBTB or NWBI?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northwest Bancshares, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRCH or HIFS or ICE or NBTB or NWBI?
Over the past 5 years, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) delivered a total return of +43. 4%, compared to -10. 7% for Porch Group, Inc. (PRCH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +225. 3% versus PRCH's +13. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRCH or HIFS or ICE or NBTB or NWBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Porch Group, Inc. 's 2. 22β — meaning PRCH is approximately 577% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 18% for Porch Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRCH or HIFS or ICE or NBTB or NWBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus 7. 5% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Porch Group, Inc. grew EPS 90. 2% year-over-year, compared to 6. 8% for Hingham Institution for Savings. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRCH or HIFS or ICE or NBTB or NWBI?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 3. 2% for Porch Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 7. 6% for PRCH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRCH or HIFS or ICE or NBTB or NWBI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Hingham Institution for Savings — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRCH: 77. 3% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRCH or HIFS or ICE or NBTB or NWBI?
In this comparison, NWBI (5.
4% yield), NBTB (3. 2% yield), ICE (1. 2% yield), HIFS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. PRCH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PRCH or HIFS or ICE or NBTB or NWBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 2% yield, +225. 3% 10Y return). Porch Group, Inc. (PRCH) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +225. 3%, PRCH: +13. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRCH and HIFS and ICE and NBTB and NWBI?
These companies operate in different sectors (PRCH (Technology) and HIFS (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and NWBI (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PRCH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock. HIFS, ICE, NBTB, NWBI pay a dividend while PRCH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.