Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PRCH vs ROOT vs LMND vs OPEN vs HIPO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PRCH
Porch Group, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.23B
5Y Perf.-23.9%
ROOT
Root, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$798M
5Y Perf.-84.3%
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.18B
5Y Perf.-62.5%
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.08B
5Y Perf.-79.6%
HIPO
Hippo Holdings Inc.

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$714M
5Y Perf.-90.4%

PRCH vs ROOT vs LMND vs OPEN vs HIPO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PRCH logoPRCH
ROOT logoROOT
LMND logoLMND
OPEN logoOPEN
HIPO logoHIPO
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationInsurance - Property & CasualtyInsurance - Property & CasualtyReal Estate - ServicesInsurance - Specialty
Market Cap$1.23B$798M$4.18B$4.08B$714M
Revenue (TTM)$483M$1.56B$821M$3.94B$480M
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$56M$-139M$-1.39B$113M
Gross Margin72.4%17.9%47.6%7.9%40.5%
Operating Margin10.3%4.1%-16.3%-9.9%24.2%
Forward P/E29.0x114.3x
Total Debt$393M$201M$182M$193M$52M
Cash & Equiv.$53M$690M$385M$962M$250M

PRCH vs ROOT vs LMND vs OPEN vs HIPOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PRCH
ROOT
LMND
OPEN
HIPO
StockJan 21May 26Return
Porch Group, Inc. (PRCH)10076.1-23.9%
Root, Inc. (ROOT)10015.7-84.3%
Lemonade, Inc. (LMND)10037.5-62.5%
Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN)10020.4-79.6%
Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO)1009.6-90.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PRCH vs ROOT vs LMND vs OPEN vs HIPO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HIPO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Root, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. LMND and OPEN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PRCH
Porch Group, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

PRCH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 13.9% 10Y total return vs LMND's -21.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
ROOT
Root, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

ROOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.

  • Rev growth 29.0%, EPS growth 22.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 69.6%
  • Beta 2.30, current ratio 2.62x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

LMND ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 40.2% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
Best for: growth
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +5.1% vs ROOT's -59.3%
Best for: momentum
HIPO
Hippo Holdings Inc.
The Insurance Pick

HIPO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.40
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 12.0%, current ratio 0.35x
  • 23.4% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
  • Beta 1.40 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLMND logoLMND40.2% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
ValueROOT logoROOTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsHIPO logoHIPO23.4% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
Stability / SafetyHIPO logoHIPOBeta 1.40 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)OPEN logoOPEN+5.1% vs ROOT's -59.3%
Efficiency (ROA)HIPO logoHIPO6.0% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 22.8% vs -15.8%

PRCH vs ROOT vs LMND vs OPEN vs HIPO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PRCHPorch Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Recurring
92.1%$394M
Transactional
7.9%$34M
ROOTRoot, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LMNDLemonade, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$738M
OPENOpendoor Technologies Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HIPOHippo Holdings Inc.
FY 2024
Services Segment
100.0%$48M

PRCH vs ROOT vs LMND vs OPEN vs HIPO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHIPOLAGGINGOPEN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HIPO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

OPEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 8.2x HIPO's $480M. HIPO is the more profitable business, keeping 23.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, LMND holds the edge at +55.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPRCH logoPRCHPorch Group, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…HIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$483M$1.6B$821M$3.9B$480M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$72M$73M-$121M-$363M$116M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M$56M-$139M-$1.4B$113M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$72M$181M$20M$1.1B$50M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+72.4%+17.9%+47.6%+7.9%+40.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.3%+4.1%-16.3%-9.9%+24.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-1.8%+3.6%-16.9%-35.2%+23.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.0%+11.6%+2.4%+27.2%+10.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.6%+12.6%+55.0%-37.6%+10.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-157.1%+95.3%+45.3%-50.0%+114.1%
HIPO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ROOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.4x trailing earnings, HIPO trades at a 51% valuation discount to ROOT's 25.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ROOT's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRCH's 27.5x.

MetricPRCH logoPRCHPorch Group, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…HIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$798M$4.2B$4.1B$714M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.6B$309M$4.0B$3.3B$517M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-348.15x25.41x-23.67x-3.13x12.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.04x114.33x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.52x5.88x8.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.56x0.53x5.67x0.93x1.52x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share52.25x2.47x7.33x4.06x1.64x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF23.71x4.15x3.93x78.49x
ROOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HIPO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HIPO delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. HIPO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRCH's 17.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRCH scores 8/9 vs LMND's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPRCH logoPRCHPorch Group, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…HIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-60.9%+15.4%-26.5%-163.2%+27.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.1%+3.7%-7.4%-53.6%+6.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.9%-36.8%-15.8%+22.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.5%+3.8%-22.7%-11.7%+6.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–986455
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage17.55x0.51x0.34x0.19x0.12x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$340M-$489M-$203M-$769M-$198M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$53M$690M$385M$962M$250M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$393M$201M$182M$193M$52M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.35x1.86x-8.92x
HIPO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRCH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PRCH five years ago would be worth $8,931 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,105 for HIPO. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs ROOT's -59.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRCH at 133.5% vs HIPO's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPRCH logoPRCHPorch Group, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…HIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+22.3%-19.7%-28.3%-12.4%-8.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+5.9%-59.3%+78.2%+510.1%+12.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1173.1%+927.3%+234.7%+159.5%+48.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.7%-69.6%-31.2%-71.6%-88.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+13.9%-88.3%-21.6%-50.8%-90.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+133.5%+117.4%+49.6%+37.4%+14.0%
PRCH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

HIPO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

HIPO is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HIPO currently trades 70.4% from its 52-week high vs ROOT's 34.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPRCH logoPRCHPorch Group, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…HIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.22x2.30x2.75x3.09x1.40x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.44$162.99$99.90$10.87$38.98
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.36$40.91$28.71$0.51$19.92
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+58.0%+34.9%+54.5%+48.9%+70.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10075.056.636.356.248.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M330K1.9M36.3M110K
HIPO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: PRCH as "Buy", ROOT as "Hold", LMND as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", HIPO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 77.3% upside for PRCH (target: $20) vs 3.4% for HIPO (target: $28).

MetricPRCH logoPRCHPorch Group, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…HIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$20.00$75.00$72.67$6.50$28.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts131415266
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+2.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

HIPO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ROOT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallHippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PRCH vs ROOT vs LMND vs OPEN vs HIPO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PRCH or ROOT or LMND or OPEN or HIPO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (114. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Porch Group, Inc. (PRCH) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PRCH or ROOT or LMND or OPEN or HIPO?

On trailing P/E, Hippo Holdings Inc.

(HIPO) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus Root, Inc. at 25. 4x. On forward P/E, Root, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PRCH or ROOT or LMND or OPEN or HIPO?

Over the past 5 years, Porch Group, Inc.

(PRCH) delivered a total return of -10. 7%, compared to -88. 9% for Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRCH returned +13. 9% versus HIPO's -90. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PRCH or ROOT or LMND or OPEN or HIPO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hippo Holdings Inc.

(HIPO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 121% more volatile than HIPO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 18% for Porch Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PRCH or ROOT or LMND or OPEN or HIPO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hippo Holdings Inc. grew EPS 235. 4% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROOT leads at 69. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PRCH or ROOT or LMND or OPEN or HIPO?

Hippo Holdings Inc.

(HIPO) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIPO leads at 13. 5% versus -21. 8% for LMND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRCH leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PRCH or ROOT or LMND or OPEN or HIPO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Root, Inc.

(ROOT) trades at 29. 0x forward P/E versus 114. 3x for Hippo Holdings Inc. — 85. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRCH: 77. 3% to $20. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PRCH or ROOT or LMND or OPEN or HIPO?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is PRCH or ROOT or LMND or OPEN or HIPO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hippo Holdings Inc.

(HIPO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Root, Inc. (ROOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HIPO: -90. 5%, ROOT: -88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PRCH and ROOT and LMND and OPEN and HIPO?

These companies operate in different sectors (PRCH (Technology) and ROOT (Financial Services) and LMND (Financial Services) and OPEN (Real Estate) and HIPO (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PRCH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ROOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; LMND is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIPO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PRCH

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 43%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ROOT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LMND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OPEN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIPO

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PRCH and ROOT and LMND and OPEN and HIPO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PRCH: 15.6% · ROOT: 12.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.