Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PRG vs AFRM vs SEZL vs OMF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
PRG vs AFRM vs SEZL vs OMF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.43B | $22.44B | $3.36B | $6.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.52B | $3.20B | $450M | $6.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $148M | $382M | $148M | $796M |
| Gross Margin | 82.7% | 62.6% | 85.4% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | 10.2% | 39.3% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.7x | 62.5x | 21.2x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $609M | $7.85B | $141M | $22.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $309M | $1.35B | $64M | $914M |
PRG vs AFRM vs SEZL vs OMF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) | 100 | 75.6 | -24.4% |
| Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM) | 100 | 67.6 | -32.4% |
| Sezzle Inc. (SEZL) | 100 | 175.1 | +75.1% |
| OneMain Holdings, I… (OMF) | 100 | 119.6 | +19.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRG vs AFRM vs SEZL vs OMF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 81.6%, current ratio 11.22x
- 1.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs OMF's 4.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
AFRM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 38.8%, EPS growth 109.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.7%
SEZL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs OMF's 189.2%
- 66.1% NII/revenue growth vs PRG's -2.2%
- 29.6% margin vs PRG's 5.9%
- +89.2% vs OMF's +22.9%
OMF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 4.7%
- Beta 1.30, yield 4.7%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.2x)
- Beta 1.30 vs AFRM's 2.72
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.1% NII/revenue growth vs PRG's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs PRG's 5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs AFRM's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs OMF's 4.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +89.2% vs OMF's +22.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 37.7% ROA vs OMF's 2.9%, ROIC 52.7% vs 3.0% |
PRG vs AFRM vs SEZL vs OMF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PRG vs AFRM vs SEZL vs OMF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEZL leads in 3 of 6 categories
OMF leads 1 • PRG leads 0 • AFRM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEZL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OMF is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.2B annually — 13.9x SEZL's $450M. SEZL is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRG's 5.9%. On growth, PRG holds the edge at +8.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $3.2B | $450M | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | $533M | $197M | $943M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $148M | $382M | $148M | $796M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $286M | $787M | $238M | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +82.7% | +62.6% | +85.4% | +47.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +10.2% | +39.3% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +11.9% | +29.6% | +12.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +24.6% | +46.3% | +50.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | -65.8% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | — | +47.0% | +8.4% |
Valuation Metrics
OMF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, OMF trades at a 98% valuation discount to AFRM's 449.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRG's 0.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AFRM's 210.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $22.4B | $3.4B | $6.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $28.9B | $3.4B | $28.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.94x | 449.07x | 26.83x | 8.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.67x | 62.49x | 21.25x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.93x | 209.99x | 19.27x | 21.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 6.96x | 7.45x | 1.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.95x | 7.48x | 21.01x | 1.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.40x | 37.29x | 16.11x | 2.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEZL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEZL delivers a 90.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $91 in annual profit, vs $11 for AFRM. PRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OMF's 6.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEZL scores 9/9 vs AFRM's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.5% | +11.2% | +90.9% | +23.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.9% | +3.1% | +37.7% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.8% | -0.7% | +52.7% | +3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.7% | -0.9% | +70.3% | +3.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 2.56x | 0.83x | 6.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $301M | $6.5B | $77M | $21.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $309M | $1.4B | $64M | $914M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $609M | $7.9B | $141M | $22.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.12x | 1.88x | 23.74x | 0.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SEZL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SEZL five years ago would be worth $21,738 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,598 for PRG. Over the past 12 months, SEZL leads with a +89.2% total return vs OMF's +22.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEZL at 2.1% vs PRG's 6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.0% | -9.0% | +53.2% | -17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.0% | +30.7% | +89.2% | +22.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.5% | +464.2% | +2962.0% | +87.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.0% | +24.7% | +117.4% | +36.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.0% | -30.7% | +687.8% | +189.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.4% | +78.0% | +2.1% | +23.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRG and OMF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMF is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFRM's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRG currently trades 86.7% from its 52-week high vs SEZL's 53.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 2.72x | 2.39x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.14 | $100.00 | $186.74 | $71.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.80 | $42.09 | $49.50 | $45.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.7% | +67.4% | +53.5% | +77.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 63.1 | 61.9 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 499K | 5.3M | 808K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRG and OMF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRG as "Buy", AFRM as "Buy", SEZL as "Buy", OMF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.2% upside for OMF (target: $70) vs -14.8% for SEZL (target: $85). For income investors, OMF offers the higher dividend yield at 4.65% vs PRG's 1.42%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.50 | $80.77 | $85.00 | $69.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 33 | 5 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | — | — | +4.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.51 | — | — | $2.59 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +1.1% | +1.9% | +2.4% |
SEZL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OMF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PRG vs AFRM vs SEZL vs OMF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRG or AFRM or SEZL or OMF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) is the stronger pick with 66. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRG or AFRM or SEZL or OMF?
On trailing P/E, OneMain Holdings, Inc.
(OMF) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 449. 1x. On forward P/E, OneMain Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRG or AFRM or SEZL or OMF?
Over the past 5 years, Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) delivered a total return of +117. 4%, compared to -34. 0% for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SEZL returned +687. 8% versus AFRM's -30. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRG or AFRM or SEZL or OMF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OneMain Holdings, Inc.
(OMF) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AFRM is approximately 109% more volatile than OMF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 82% versus 7% for OneMain Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRG or AFRM or SEZL or OMF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) is pulling ahead at 66. 1% versus -2. 2% for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affirm Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 109. 0% year-over-year, compared to -20. 8% for PROG Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AFRM leads at 33. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRG or AFRM or SEZL or OMF?
Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus 1. 6% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEZL leads at 39. 3% versus -2. 7% for AFRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEZL leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRG or AFRM or SEZL or OMF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OneMain Holdings, Inc.
(OMF) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 54. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OMF: 25. 2% to $69. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRG or AFRM or SEZL or OMF?
In this comparison, OMF (4.
7% yield), PRG (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. AFRM, SEZL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PRG or AFRM or SEZL or OMF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OneMain Holdings, Inc.
(OMF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 7% yield, +189. 2% 10Y return). Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMF: +189. 2%, AFRM: -30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRG and AFRM and SEZL and OMF?
These companies operate in different sectors (PRG (Industrials) and AFRM (Technology) and SEZL (Financial Services) and OMF (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PRG is a small-cap deep-value stock; AFRM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SEZL is a small-cap high-growth stock; OMF is a small-cap deep-value stock. PRG, OMF pay a dividend while AFRM, SEZL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.