Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PRG vs EZPW vs WRLD vs ENVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
PRG vs EZPW vs WRLD vs ENVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.43B | $1.93B | $753M | $4.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.52B | $1.27B | $565M | $3.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $148M | $123M | $43M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | 82.7% | 58.5% | 70.0% | 50.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | 11.7% | 28.1% | 23.5% |
| Forward P/E | 7.7x | 18.4x | 21.1x | 10.5x |
| Total Debt | $609M | $764M | $526M | $4.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $309M | $470M | $10M | $72M |
PRG vs EZPW vs WRLD vs ENVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
| EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) | 100 | 637.2 | +537.2% |
| World Acceptance Co… (WRLD) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
| Enova International… (ENVA) | 100 | 1219.1 | +1119.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRG vs EZPW vs WRLD vs ENVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 18.4x)
- 1.4% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- 8.9% ROA vs WRLD's 4.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs 12.1%
EZPW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.82
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 74.5%, current ratio 5.61x
- Beta 0.82 vs ENVA's 1.48, lower leverage
- +124.3% vs WRLD's +12.8%
WRLD is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.27, current ratio 12.55x
- 15.9% margin vs PRG's 5.9%
ENVA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 55.9%
- 20.3% 10Y total return vs EZPW's 5.9%
- 18.6% NII/revenue growth vs PRG's -2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% NII/revenue growth vs PRG's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 18.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.9% margin vs PRG's 5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs ENVA's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +124.3% vs WRLD's +12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs WRLD's 4.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs 12.1% |
PRG vs EZPW vs WRLD vs ENVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PRG vs EZPW vs WRLD vs ENVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRG leads in 3 of 6 categories
WRLD leads 1 • EZPW leads 0 • ENVA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WRLD leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 5.6x WRLD's $565M. WRLD is the more profitable business, keeping 15.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRG's 5.9%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $1.3B | $565M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | $201M | $61M | $815M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $148M | $123M | $43M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $286M | $123M | $252M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +82.7% | +58.5% | +70.0% | +50.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +11.7% | +28.1% | +23.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +8.6% | +15.9% | +9.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +8.7% | +44.3% | +56.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | +37.5% | -107.8% | +28.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PRG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, WRLD trades at a 60% valuation discount to EZPW's 23.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRG's 0.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EZPW's 12.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $1.9B | $753M | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $2.2B | $1.3B | $8.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.94x | 23.15x | 9.17x | 14.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.67x | 18.35x | 21.15x | 10.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.93x | 12.25x | 7.53x | 11.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 1.52x | 1.33x | 1.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.95x | 2.67x | 1.87x | 3.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.40x | 17.49x | 3.01x | 2.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRG leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVA delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $11 for WRLD. EZPW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.75x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENVA's 3.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRLD scores 9/9 vs ENVA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.5% | +12.5% | +10.8% | +24.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.9% | +6.4% | +4.0% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.8% | +7.1% | +12.1% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.7% | +10.0% | +16.3% | +13.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.75x | 1.20x | 3.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $301M | $295M | $516M | $4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $309M | $470M | $10M | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $609M | $764M | $526M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.12x | 6.63x | 1.13x | 79.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — EZPW and ENVA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EZPW five years ago would be worth $50,663 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,598 for PRG. Over the past 12 months, EZPW leads with a +124.3% total return vs WRLD's +12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVA at 59.0% vs PRG's 6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.0% | +63.9% | +5.5% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.0% | +124.3% | +12.8% | +87.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.5% | +264.9% | +32.8% | +302.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.0% | +406.6% | +11.3% | +368.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.0% | +590.8% | +266.2% | +2034.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.4% | +54.0% | +9.9% | +59.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EZPW and ENVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EZPW is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVA's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENVA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs WRLD's 80.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 0.82x | 1.27x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.14 | $37.13 | $185.48 | $176.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.80 | $12.85 | $110.00 | $89.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.7% | +88.6% | +80.6% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 79.8 | 53.8 | 65.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 499K | 733K | 160K | 227K |
Analyst Outlook
PRG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRG as "Buy", EZPW as "Buy", WRLD as "Hold", ENVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for PRG (target: $43) vs -17.1% for EZPW (target: $27). PRG is the only dividend payer here at 1.42% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.50 | $27.25 | — | $199.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 15 | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.51 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +0.4% | +7.2% | +5.0% |
PRG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WRLD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
PRG vs EZPW vs WRLD vs ENVA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRG or EZPW or WRLD or ENVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRG or EZPW or WRLD or ENVA?
On trailing P/E, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus EZCORP, Inc. at 23. 2x. On forward P/E, PROG Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRG or EZPW or WRLD or ENVA?
Over the past 5 years, EZCORP, Inc.
(EZPW) delivered a total return of +406. 6%, compared to -34. 0% for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENVA returned +20. 3% versus PRG's +46. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRG or EZPW or WRLD or ENVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EZCORP, Inc.
(EZPW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Enova International, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning ENVA is approximately 81% more volatile than EZPW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 75% versus 3% for Enova International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRG or EZPW or WRLD or ENVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus -2. 2% for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enova International, Inc. grew EPS 55. 9% year-over-year, compared to -20. 8% for PROG Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRG or EZPW or WRLD or ENVA?
World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus 6. 1% for PROG Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WRLD leads at 28. 1% versus 9. 9% for PRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WRLD leads at 70. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRG or EZPW or WRLD or ENVA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PROG Holdings, Inc.
(PRG) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 21. 1x for World Acceptance Corporation — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRG: 19. 1% to $42. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRG or EZPW or WRLD or ENVA?
In this comparison, PRG (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. EZPW, WRLD, ENVA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PRG or EZPW or WRLD or ENVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EZCORP, Inc.
(EZPW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), +590. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EZPW: +590. 8%, ENVA: +20. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRG and EZPW and WRLD and ENVA?
These companies operate in different sectors (PRG (Industrials) and EZPW (Financial Services) and WRLD (Financial Services) and ENVA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PRG is a small-cap deep-value stock; EZPW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WRLD is a small-cap deep-value stock; ENVA is a small-cap high-growth stock. PRG pays a dividend while EZPW, WRLD, ENVA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.