Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PRGS vs GWRE vs PEGA vs NOW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
PRGS vs GWRE vs PEGA vs NOW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.24B | $11.80B | $6.21B | $96.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $978M | $1.34B | $1.70B | $13.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73M | $189M | $341M | $1.76B |
| Gross Margin | 80.8% | 63.8% | 75.0% | 76.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | 6.8% | 10.2% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 4.9x | 39.7x | 13.5x | 22.5x |
| Total Debt | $851M | $716M | $76M | $3.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $95M | $699M | $212M | $3.73B |
PRGS vs GWRE vs PEGA vs NOW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progress Software C… (PRGS) | 100 | 72.7 | -27.3% |
| Guidewire Software,… (GWRE) | 100 | 136.1 | +36.1% |
| Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) | 100 | 77.2 | -22.8% |
| ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) | 100 | 24.1 | -75.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRGS vs GWRE vs PEGA vs NOW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRGS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 29.8% revenue growth vs PEGA's 16.6%
- Lower P/E (4.9x vs 22.5x)
GWRE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.6%, EPS growth 11.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 151.9% 10Y total return vs PEGA's 188.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 49.1%, current ratio 2.77x
- Beta 0.61 vs NOW's 1.46
PEGA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.16, yield 0.2%
- Beta 1.16, yield 0.2%, current ratio 1.33x
- 20.0% margin vs PRGS's 7.5%
- 0.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRGS's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
NOW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.8% revenue growth vs PEGA's 16.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.9x vs 22.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs PRGS's 7.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs NOW's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRGS's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -20.8% vs NOW's -90.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.5% ROA vs PRGS's 3.0%, ROIC 27.2% vs 7.4% |
PRGS vs GWRE vs PEGA vs NOW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PRGS vs GWRE vs PEGA vs NOW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRGS leads in 2 of 6 categories
PEGA leads 2 • GWRE leads 1 • NOW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.0B annually — 14.3x PRGS's $978M. PEGA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGS's 7.5%. On growth, GWRE holds the edge at +24.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $978M | $1.3B | $1.7B | $14.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $160M | $103M | $193M | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73M | $189M | $341M | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $229M | $310M | $495M | $4.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.8% | +63.8% | +75.0% | +76.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +6.8% | +10.2% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +14.1% | +20.0% | +12.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +23.1% | +29.1% | +33.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.5% | +24.0% | -9.6% | +22.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.2% | +2.6% | -60.0% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.2x trailing earnings, PEGA trades at a 90% valuation discount to GWRE's 172.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRGS's 12.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GWRE's 182.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $11.8B | $6.2B | $97.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $11.8B | $6.1B | $96.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.69x | 172.32x | 17.24x | 56.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.91x | 39.70x | 13.52x | 22.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.53x | 182.26x | 21.01x | 37.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 9.81x | 3.56x | 7.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.70x | 8.23x | 8.62x | 7.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.42x | 39.98x | 12.65x | 21.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PEGA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PEGA delivers a 50.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $50 in annual profit, vs $13 for GWRE. PEGA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGS's 1.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PEGA scores 8/9 vs NOW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.3% | +12.9% | +50.2% | +15.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +7.2% | +23.5% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +2.3% | +27.2% | +12.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +2.3% | +33.4% | +13.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.78x | 0.49x | 0.10x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $756M | $17M | -$136M | -$523M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $95M | $699M | $212M | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $851M | $716M | $76M | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.16x | 388.85x | 643.17x | 185.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GWRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GWRE five years ago would be worth $14,142 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,935 for NOW. Over the past 12 months, PEGA leads with a -20.8% total return vs NOW's -90.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GWRE at 21.6% vs NOW's -40.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.5% | -25.6% | -34.4% | -36.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.9% | -34.5% | -20.8% | -90.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.5% | +79.6% | +68.5% | -78.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.0% | +41.4% | -38.3% | -80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.0% | +151.9% | +188.8% | +38.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.3% | +21.6% | +19.0% | -40.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GWRE and PEGA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GWRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NOW's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PEGA currently trades 53.9% from its 52-week high vs NOW's 8.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.61x | 1.16x | 1.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $65.50 | $272.60 | $68.10 | $1057.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.82 | $115.57 | $34.34 | $81.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.8% | +51.2% | +53.9% | +8.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 41.6 | 38.8 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 994K | 1.4M | 2.2M | 21.2M |
Analyst Outlook
PEGA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRGS as "Buy", GWRE as "Buy", PEGA as "Buy", NOW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 75.6% upside for GWRE (target: $245) vs 53.2% for PRGS (target: $45). PEGA is the only dividend payer here at 0.23% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.00 | $245.17 | $56.60 | $151.52 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 26 | 23 | 68 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — | $0.08 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.5% | 0.0% | +8.3% | +1.9% |
PRGS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PEGA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PRGS vs GWRE vs PEGA vs NOW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRGS or GWRE or PEGA or NOW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is the stronger pick with 29.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 6% for Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA). Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) offers the better valuation at 17. 2x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRGS or GWRE or PEGA or NOW?
On trailing P/E, Pegasystems Inc.
(PEGA) is the cheapest at 17. 2x versus Guidewire Software, Inc. at 172. 3x. On forward P/E, Progress Software Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRGS or GWRE or PEGA or NOW?
Over the past 5 years, Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) delivered a total return of +41. 4%, compared to -80. 6% for ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PEGA returned +188. 8% versus NOW's +38. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRGS or GWRE or PEGA or NOW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus ServiceNow, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning NOW is approximately 139% more volatile than GWRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 178% for Progress Software Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRGS or GWRE or PEGA or NOW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is pulling ahead at 29.
8% versus 16. 6% for Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guidewire Software, Inc. grew EPS 1192% year-over-year, compared to 7. 8% for Progress Software Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NOW leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRGS or GWRE or PEGA or NOW?
Pegasystems Inc.
(PEGA) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus 5. 8% for Guidewire Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRGS leads at 15. 7% versus 3. 4% for GWRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRGS leads at 80. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRGS or GWRE or PEGA or NOW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) trades at 4.
9x forward P/E versus 39. 7x for Guidewire Software, Inc. — 34. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GWRE: 75. 6% to $245. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRGS or GWRE or PEGA or NOW?
In this comparison, PEGA (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. PRGS, GWRE, NOW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PRGS or GWRE or PEGA or NOW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), +151. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GWRE: +151. 9%, NOW: +38. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRGS and GWRE and PEGA and NOW?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.