Insurance - Life
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PRI vs FG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Life
PRI vs FG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Insurance - Life |
| Market Cap | $8.65B | $3.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.33B | $5.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $772M | $530M |
| Gross Margin | 62.0% | 21.0% |
| Operating Margin | 30.1% | 6.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $2.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $756M | $1.49B |
PRI vs FG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primerica, Inc. (PRI) | 100 | 183.2 | +83.2% |
| F&G Annuities & Lif… (FG) | 100 | 117.8 | +17.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRI vs FG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 1.5%
- 482.1% 10Y total return vs FG's 78.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 74.4%, current ratio 6.59x
FG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth -61.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.8%
- 5.7% revenue growth vs PRI's 4.4%
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 11.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.7% revenue growth vs PRI's 4.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 11.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs FG's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs FG's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FG's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.0% vs FG's -22.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs FG's 0.5%, ROIC 20.8% vs 5.0% |
PRI vs FG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PRI vs FG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PRI and FG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FG is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 1.8x PRI's $3.3B. PRI is the more profitable business, keeping 23.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FG's 9.0%. On growth, FG holds the edge at +39.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.3B | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $772M | $530M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $857M | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.0% | +21.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +82.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +39.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | +9.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, PRI trades at a 17% valuation discount to FG's 14.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FG's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRI's 9.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.6B | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.7B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.92x | 14.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.42x | 6.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.62x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.77x | 4.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.68x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.65x | 0.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.82x | 0.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRI delivers a 32.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $11 for FG. FG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRI's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRI scores 8/9 vs FG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.3% | +11.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.8% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | +0.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $751M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $756M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.40x | 2.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PRI and FG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FG five years ago would be worth $17,857 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,573 for PRI. Over the past 12 months, PRI leads with a +4.0% total return vs FG's -22.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FG at 21.1% vs PRI's 15.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.0% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.0% | -22.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.7% | +77.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.7% | +78.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +482.1% | +78.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | +21.1% |
Risk & Volatility
PRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FG's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRI currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs FG's 73.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $288.03 | $36.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $230.09 | $20.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +73.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 71.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 186K | 591K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRI and FG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PRI as "Hold" and FG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for FG (target: $31) vs 6.9% for PRI (target: $292). For income investors, FG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.83% vs PRI's 1.52%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $292.00 | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.16 | $1.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.2% | +0.3% |
PRI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). FG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PRI vs FG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRI or FG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
(FG) is the stronger pick with 5. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 4% for Primerica, Inc. (PRI). Primerica, Inc. (PRI) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Primerica, Inc. (PRI) a "Hold" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRI or FG?
On trailing P/E, Primerica, Inc.
(PRI) is the cheapest at 11. 9x versus F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRI or FG?
Over the past 5 years, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
(FG) delivered a total return of +78. 6%, compared to +75. 7% for Primerica, Inc. (PRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRI returned +482. 1% versus FG's +78. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRI or FG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Primerica, Inc.
(PRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning FG is approximately 60% more volatile than PRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 74% for Primerica, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRI or FG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
(FG) is pulling ahead at 5. 7% versus 4. 4% for Primerica, Inc. (PRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Primerica, Inc. grew EPS 67. 1% year-over-year, compared to -61. 5% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FG leads at 36. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRI or FG?
Primerica, Inc.
(PRI) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 3% net margin versus 4. 6% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRI leads at 30. 2% versus 5. 6% for FG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRI leads at 80. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRI or FG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
(FG) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for Primerica, Inc. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FG: 14. 4% to $31. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRI or FG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 5% for Primerica, Inc. (PRI).
09Is PRI or FG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Primerica, Inc.
(PRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 1. 5% yield, +482. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRI: +482. 1%, FG: +78. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRI and FG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.