Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PSNL vs ILMN vs NTRA vs PACB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PSNL
Personalis, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$532M
5Y Perf.-49.4%
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$21.07B
5Y Perf.-60.7%
NTRA
Natera, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31.16B
5Y Perf.+401.3%
PACB
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$498M
5Y Perf.-53.1%

PSNL vs ILMN vs NTRA vs PACB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PSNL logoPSNL
ILMN logoILMN
NTRA logoNTRA
PACB logoPACB
IndustryMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Devices
Market Cap$532M$21.07B$31.16B$498M
Revenue (TTM)$49M$4.39B$2.31B$160M
Net Income (TTM)$-96M$853M$-208M$-546M
Gross Margin-13.5%67.1%64.8%28.2%
Operating Margin-209.0%20.9%-13.4%-346.1%
Forward P/E26.8x
Total Debt$32M$2.55B$214M$759M
Cash & Equiv.$124M$1.42B$1.08B$64M

PSNL vs ILMN vs NTRA vs PACBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PSNL
ILMN
NTRA
PACB
StockMay 20May 26Return
Personalis, Inc. (PSNL)10050.6-49.4%
Illumina, Inc. (ILMN)10039.3-60.7%
Natera, Inc. (NTRA)100501.3+401.3%
Pacific Biosciences… (PACB)10046.9-53.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PSNL vs ILMN vs NTRA vs PACB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ILMN leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Natera, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PSNL
Personalis, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

PSNL plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.
The Income Pick

ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.23
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 93.8%, current ratio 2.08x
  • Better valuation composite
  • 19.4% margin vs PACB's -341.5%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NTRA
Natera, Inc.
The Growth Play

NTRA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 35.9%, EPS growth 0.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.1%
  • 20.9% 10Y total return vs ILMN's 0.7%
  • 35.9% revenue growth vs PSNL's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
PACB
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PACB is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 2.43, current ratio 6.89x
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNTRA logoNTRA35.9% revenue growth vs PSNL's -100.0%
ValueILMN logoILMNBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsILMN logoILMN19.4% margin vs PACB's -341.5%
Stability / SafetyILMN logoILMNBeta 1.23 vs PSNL's 2.75
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ILMN logoILMN+81.7% vs PSNL's +23.8%
Efficiency (ROA)ILMN logoILMN13.4% ROA vs PACB's -66.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs -45.8%

PSNL vs ILMN vs NTRA vs PACB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PSNLPersonalis, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ILMNIllumina, Inc.
FY 2025
Sequencing
91.8%$4.0B
Microarray
8.2%$358M
NTRANatera, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.6%$2.3B
Licensing and other
0.4%$10M
PACBPacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
45.9%$136M
Consumable
27.7%$82M
Instrument
18.2%$54M
Service And Other
8.2%$24M

PSNL vs ILMN vs NTRA vs PACB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLILMNLAGGINGPACB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ILMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 89.5x PSNL's $49M. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PACB's -3.4%. On growth, NTRA holds the edge at +39.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPSNL logoPSNLPersonalis, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$49M$4.4B$2.3B$160M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$95M$1.1B-$310M-$169M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$96M$853M-$208M-$546M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$85M$989M$97M-$124M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-13.5%+67.1%+64.8%+28.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.1%+20.9%-13.4%-3.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-194.8%+19.4%-9.0%-3.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-172.6%+22.5%+4.2%-77.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+4.8%+39.8%+13.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-61.1%+6.1%+185.4%
ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PSNL and ILMN and NTRA and PACB each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricPSNL logoPSNLPersonalis, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
Market CapShares × price$532M$21.1B$31.2B$498M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$440M$22.2B$30.3B$1.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-6.58x25.45x-144.62x-0.91x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.26.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate6.01x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.86x13.51x3.11x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.05x7.95x17.55x92.53x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.63x285.53x
Evenly matched — PSNL and ILMN and NTRA and PACB each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-11 for PACB. PSNL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACB's 141.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs PACB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPSNL logoPSNLPersonalis, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-43.5%+32.8%-15.3%-11.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-32.9%+13.4%-10.6%-66.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-40.7%+16.8%-36.1%-45.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-33.0%+17.6%-18.3%-58.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94853
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.12x0.94x0.13x141.98x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$92M$1.1B-$862M$696M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$124M$1.4B$1.1B$64M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$32M$2.6B$214M$759M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-990.79x12.09x-25.21x-77.95x
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NTRA five years ago would be worth $21,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $663 for PACB. Over the past 12 months, ILMN leads with a +81.7% total return vs PSNL's +23.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRA at 60.6% vs PACB's -48.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPSNL logoPSNLPersonalis, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-23.7%+3.2%-3.9%-10.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+23.8%+81.7%+37.3%+46.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+163.9%-27.1%+314.0%-86.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-73.7%-62.8%+115.9%-93.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.0%+0.7%+2089.4%-81.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+38.2%-10.0%+60.6%-48.7%
NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ILMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSNL's 2.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs PSNL's 52.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPSNL logoPSNLPersonalis, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.75x1.23x1.26x2.43x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.50$155.53$256.36$2.73
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.84$73.86$131.81$0.85
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+52.1%+89.2%+85.7%+60.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.765.257.160.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.8M1.5M1.3M5.9M
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: PSNL as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy", NTRA as "Buy", PACB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 87.8% upside for PSNL (target: $11) vs -39.4% for PACB (target: $1).

MetricPSNL logoPSNLPersonalis, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$11.25$147.38$262.50$1.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts12502718
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.5%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTRA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallIllumina, Inc. (ILMN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PSNL vs ILMN vs NTRA vs PACB: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PSNL or ILMN or NTRA or PACB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) is the stronger pick with 35. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Personalis, Inc. (PSNL). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Personalis, Inc. (PSNL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — PSNL or ILMN or NTRA or PACB?

Over the past 5 years, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) delivered a total return of +115. 9%, compared to -93. 4% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +20. 9% versus PACB's -81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — PSNL or ILMN or NTRA or PACB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus Personalis, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning PSNL is approximately 123% more volatile than ILMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Personalis, Inc. (PSNL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 142% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — PSNL or ILMN or NTRA or PACB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) is pulling ahead at 35. 9% versus -100. 0% for Personalis, Inc. (PSNL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -70. 1% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTRA leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — PSNL or ILMN or NTRA or PACB?

Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -341. 5% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -348. 5% for PACB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ILMN leads at 66. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is PSNL or ILMN or NTRA or PACB more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PSNL: 87.

8% to $11. 25.

07

Which pays a better dividend — PSNL or ILMN or NTRA or PACB?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is PSNL or ILMN or NTRA or PACB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23)). Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB) carries a higher beta of 2. 43 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ILMN: +0. 7%, PACB: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between PSNL and ILMN and NTRA and PACB?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PSNL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NTRA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PACB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PSNL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ILMN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTRA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PACB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PSNL and ILMN and NTRA and PACB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PSNL: -100.0% · ILMN: 4.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.