Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PYPD vs AGIO vs BMY vs ABBV vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
PYPD vs AGIO vs BMY vs ABBV vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $80M | $1.65B | $114.66B | $356.49B | $30.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $66M | $48.48B | $61.16B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $-423M | $7.28B | $4.23B | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | — | 82.1% | 68.7% | 70.2% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -7.2% | 25.7% | 26.7% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 8.9x | 14.2x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $62M | $47.14B | $69.07B | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $89M | $10.21B | $5.23B | $1.98B |
PYPD vs AGIO vs BMY vs ABBV vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PolyPid Ltd. (PYPD) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| Agios Pharmaceutica… (AGIO) | 100 | 52.0 | -48.0% |
| Bristol-Myers Squib… (BMY) | 100 | 95.5 | -4.5% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 205.3 | +105.3% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 126.0 | +26.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PYPD vs AGIO vs BMY vs ABBV vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PYPD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +61.0% vs AGIO's -0.9%
AGIO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 48.0%, EPS growth -161.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 56.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 11.46x
- 48.0% revenue growth vs PYPD's -2.9%
BMY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 4.4%
- Beta 0.45, yield 4.4%, current ratio 1.26x
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 14.0x)
- 15.0% margin vs AGIO's -6.4%
ABBV is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 293.8% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.6%
- Beta 0.28 vs IQV's 1.32
Among these 5 stocks, IQV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.0% revenue growth vs PYPD's -2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 14.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs AGIO's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs IQV's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.0% vs AGIO's -0.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs PYPD's -153.2%, ROIC 16.9% vs -5.5% |
PYPD vs AGIO vs BMY vs ABBV vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PYPD vs AGIO vs BMY vs ABBV vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 2 of 6 categories
BMY leads 1 • PYPD leads 0 • AGIO leads 0 • IQV leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and PYPD operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. BMY is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AGIO's -6.4%. On growth, AGIO holds the edge at +137.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $66M | $48.5B | $61.2B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | -$470M | $15.7B | $24.5B | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | -$423M | $7.3B | $4.2B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$385M | $11.9B | $18.7B | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +82.1% | +68.7% | +70.2% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -7.2% | +25.7% | +26.7% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -6.4% | +15.0% | +6.9% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -5.8% | +24.6% | +30.6% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +137.7% | +2.6% | +10.0% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -9.0% | +9.2% | +57.4% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BMY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, BMY trades at a 81% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BMY's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 14.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $80M | $1.7B | $114.7B | $356.5B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $76M | $1.6B | $151.6B | $420.3B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.10x | -3.90x | 16.28x | 85.04x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.91x | 14.17x | 13.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.16x | 14.89x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 30.59x | 2.38x | 5.83x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.53x | 1.35x | 6.19x | — | 4.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.93x | 20.01x | 14.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BMY and ABBV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-3 for PYPD. AGIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BMY's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMY scores 8/9 vs AGIO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.1% | -34.1% | +39.0% | +62.1% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -153.2% | -31.7% | +7.9% | +3.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.5% | -26.3% | +16.9% | +23.9% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | -33.8% | +18.7% | +21.5% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.05x | 2.55x | — | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$27M | $36.9B | $63.8B | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $89M | $10.2B | $5.2B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $62M | $47.1B | $69.1B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.47x | — | 10.33x | 3.28x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $19,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $161 for PYPD. Over the past 12 months, PYPD leads with a +61.0% total return vs AGIO's -0.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 14.4% vs PYPD's -29.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.7% | +2.2% | +7.4% | -10.6% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +61.0% | -0.9% | +25.1% | +12.2% | +16.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.7% | +9.4% | -7.3% | +49.7% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -50.2% | +4.7% | +99.6% | -22.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -41.7% | +6.6% | +293.8% | +166.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.3% | +3.0% | -2.5% | +14.4% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BMY and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IQV's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BMY currently trades 89.3% from its 52-week high vs AGIO's 60.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.10x | 0.45x | 0.28x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.12 | $46.00 | $62.89 | $244.81 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.44 | $22.24 | $42.52 | $176.57 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.5% | +60.4% | +89.3% | +82.3% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 44.6 | 40.4 | 43.9 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 50K | 1.0M | 10.2M | 5.8M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BMY and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGIO as "Buy", BMY as "Hold", ABBV as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.8% upside for AGIO (target: $38) vs 10.4% for BMY (target: $62). For income investors, BMY offers the higher dividend yield at 4.40% vs ABBV's 3.26%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $37.75 | $62.00 | $256.69 | $223.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 | 41 | 41 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +4.4% | +3.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 6 | 13 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.47 | $6.57 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +4.1% |
ABBV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BMY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PYPD vs AGIO vs BMY vs ABBV vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PYPD or AGIO or BMY or ABBV or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AGIO) is the stronger pick with 48. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AGIO) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PYPD or AGIO or BMY or ABBV or IQV?
On trailing P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the cheapest at 16.
3x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 0x. On forward P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is actually cheaper at 8. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PYPD or AGIO or BMY or ABBV or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +99. 6%, compared to -98. 4% for PolyPid Ltd. (PYPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +293. 8% versus PYPD's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PYPD or AGIO or BMY or ABBV or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning IQV is approximately 378% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AGIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PYPD or AGIO or BMY or ABBV or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AGIO) is pulling ahead at 48. 0% versus -0. 2% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company grew EPS 178. 2% year-over-year, compared to -161. 2% for Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGIO leads at 56. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PYPD or AGIO or BMY or ABBV or IQV?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
6% net margin versus -764. 0% for Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -873. 9% for AGIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGIO leads at 78. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PYPD or AGIO or BMY or ABBV or IQV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) trades at 8.
9x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for AbbVie Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGIO: 35. 8% to $37. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — PYPD or AGIO or BMY or ABBV or IQV?
In this comparison, BMY (4.
4% yield), ABBV (3. 3% yield) pay a dividend. PYPD, AGIO, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PYPD or AGIO or BMY or ABBV or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 3. 3% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +293. 8%, IQV: +166. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PYPD and AGIO and BMY and ABBV and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PYPD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; BMY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BMY, ABBV pay a dividend while PYPD, AGIO, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.