Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
QVCD vs W vs AMZN vs EBAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
QVCD vs W vs AMZN vs EBAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | — | $8.71B | $2.92T | $48.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.53B | $12.66B | $742.78B | $11.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.46B | $-305M | $90.80B | $2.04B |
| Gross Margin | 78.7% | 30.1% | 50.6% | 72.0% |
| Operating Margin | -39.9% | 1.1% | 11.5% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.3x | 31.4x | 17.6x |
| Total Debt | $4.40B | $4.07B | $152.99B | $7.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $297M | $1.48B | $86.81B | $1.87B |
QVCD vs W vs AMZN vs EBAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| QVC, Inc. 6.375% Se… (QVCD) | 100 | 45.3 | -54.7% |
| Wayfair Inc. (W) | 100 | 43.8 | -56.2% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 170.5 | +70.5% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 199.9 | +99.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QVCD vs W vs AMZN vs EBAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QVCD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, current ratio 1.12x
- Beta 0.18, current ratio 1.12x
- Beta 0.18 vs W's 2.85
W is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +117.4% vs QVCD's +26.0%
AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs EBAY's 369.5%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs QVCD's -4.8%
- 11.5% ROA vs QVCD's -41.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs -7.1%
EBAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- Lower P/E (17.6x vs 31.4x)
- 17.6% margin vs QVCD's -40.5%
- 1.1% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs QVCD's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.6x vs 31.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs QVCD's -40.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs W's 2.85 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +117.4% vs QVCD's +26.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs QVCD's -41.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs -7.1% |
QVCD vs W vs AMZN vs EBAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
QVCD vs W vs AMZN vs EBAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EBAY leads in 2 of 6 categories
W leads 1 • AMZN leads 1 • QVCD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 87.1x QVCD's $8.5B. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QVCD's -40.5%. On growth, EBAY holds the edge at +19.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.5B | $12.7B | $742.8B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3.1B | $428M | $155.9B | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.5B | -$305M | $90.8B | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$142M | $456M | -$2.5B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.7% | +30.1% | +50.6% | +72.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -39.9% | +1.1% | +11.5% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -40.5% | -2.4% | +12.2% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +3.6% | -0.3% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | +7.4% | +16.6% | +19.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.1% | +74.8% | +5.7% |
Valuation Metrics
W leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.5x trailing earnings, EBAY trades at a 35% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMZN's 20.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than W's 35.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $8.7B | $2.92T | $48.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $11.3B | $2.98T | $54.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -27.36x | 37.82x | 24.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.29x | 31.41x | 17.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.35x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 35.11x | 20.47x | 21.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.70x | 4.07x | 4.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 7.14x | 10.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.78x | 378.98x | 29.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — W and AMZN and EBAY each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-3 for QVCD. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), W scores 7/9 vs QVCD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | — | +23.3% | +44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.5% | -9.6% | +11.5% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.1% | — | +14.7% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.0% | +1.4% | +15.3% | +17.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | — | 0.37x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.1B | $2.6B | $66.2B | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $297M | $1.5B | $86.8B | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.4B | $4.1B | $153.0B | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.27x | -0.63x | 39.96x | 10.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,167 for W. Over the past 12 months, W leads with a +117.4% total return vs QVCD's +26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs QVCD's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.5% | -37.9% | +19.7% | +22.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.0% | +117.4% | +43.7% | +54.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.2% | +65.6% | +156.2% | +137.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.7% | -78.3% | +64.8% | +86.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.0% | +67.0% | +697.8% | +369.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.5% | +18.3% | +36.8% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — QVCD and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QVCD is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than W's 2.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs W's 55.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.23x | 2.72x | 1.50x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.71 | $119.98 | $278.56 | $111.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.01 | $29.75 | $185.01 | $67.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.3% | +55.2% | +97.3% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 38.6 | 81.1 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36K | 3.6M | 45.5M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
EBAY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: W as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 50.2% upside for W (target: $99) vs 3.2% for EBAY (target: $110). EBAY is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $99.43 | $306.77 | $109.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 57 | 94 | 68 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.1% |
EBAY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). W leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
QVCD vs W vs AMZN vs EBAY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QVCD or W or AMZN or EBAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for QVC, Inc. 6. 375% Senior Secured (QVCD). eBay Inc. (EBAY) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wayfair Inc. (W) a "Buy" — based on 57 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QVCD or W or AMZN or EBAY?
On trailing P/E, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the cheapest at 24. 5x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, eBay Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QVCD or W or AMZN or EBAY?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to -78. 3% for Wayfair Inc. (W). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +702. 2% versus QVCD's -12. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QVCD or W or AMZN or EBAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), QVC, Inc.
6. 375% Senior Secured (QVCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Wayfair Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning W is approximately 1085% more volatile than QVCD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QVCD or W or AMZN or EBAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -4. 8% for QVC, Inc. 6. 375% Senior Secured (QVCD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wayfair Inc. grew EPS 39. 5% year-over-year, compared to 10. 2% for eBay Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QVCD or W or AMZN or EBAY?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -11. 9% for QVC, Inc. 6. 375% Senior Secured — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus -8. 6% for QVCD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QVCD leads at 92. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QVCD or W or AMZN or EBAY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) trades at 17. 6x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 13. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for W: 50. 2% to $99. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — QVCD or W or AMZN or EBAY?
In this comparison, EBAY (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. QVCD, W, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is QVCD or W or AMZN or EBAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +374. 6% 10Y return). Wayfair Inc. (W) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +374. 6%, W: +67. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QVCD and W and AMZN and EBAY?
These companies operate in different sectors (QVCD (Communication Services) and W (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
EBAY pays a dividend while QVCD, W, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.