Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RAVE vs MCD vs YUM vs DENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
RAVE vs MCD vs YUM vs DENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $40M | $196.01B | $42.00B | $322M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $27.45B | $8.48B | $457M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $8.68B | $1.74B | $10M |
| Gross Margin | 53.4% | 57.4% | 45.7% | 43.8% |
| Operating Margin | 28.3% | 46.0% | 31.5% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | 14.7x | 21.0x | 22.5x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $576K | $54.81B | $11.91B | $408M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $774M | $709M | $2M |
RAVE vs MCD vs YUM vs DENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAVE Restaurant Gro… (RAVE) | 100 | 311.1 | +211.1% |
| McDonald's Corporat… (MCD) | 100 | 148.0 | +48.0% |
| Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) | 100 | 169.3 | +69.3% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 57.4 | -42.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAVE vs MCD vs YUM vs DENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAVE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (14.7x vs 15.0x)
MCD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 27 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, current ratio 0.95x
- PEG 1.54 vs YUM's 1.65
- Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.95x
YUM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth 6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- 191.8% 10Y total return vs MCD's 151.6%
- 8.8% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5%
- 22.8% ROA vs DENN's 2.0%, ROIC 48.1% vs 9.7%
DENN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +43.3% vs MCD's -9.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.8% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.7x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.6% margin vs DENN's 2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs DENN's 0.65 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 27-year raise streak, vs YUM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.3% vs MCD's -9.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.8% ROA vs DENN's 2.0%, ROIC 48.1% vs 9.7% |
RAVE vs MCD vs YUM vs DENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RAVE vs MCD vs YUM vs DENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RAVE leads in 3 of 6 categories
MCD leads 2 • YUM leads 0 • DENN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCD is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.4B annually — 2172.8x RAVE's $13M. MCD is the more profitable business, keeping 31.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DENN's 2.2%. On growth, YUM holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $27.4B | $8.5B | $457M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $14.8B | $2.8B | $55M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $8.7B | $1.7B | $10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $7.0B | $1.6B | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.4% | +57.4% | +45.7% | +43.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.3% | +46.0% | +31.5% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +31.6% | +20.5% | +2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +25.6% | +19.4% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | +9.4% | +15.2% | +1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.7% | +6.9% | +72.2% | -89.9% |
Valuation Metrics
RAVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, RAVE trades at a 46% valuation discount to YUM's 27.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MCD offers better value at 1.69x vs YUM's 2.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $40M | $196.0B | $42.0B | $322M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38M | $250.1B | $53.2B | $728M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.74x | 23.08x | 27.33x | 15.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.96x | 22.46x | 15.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.69x | 2.01x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.87x | 17.19x | 19.45x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.31x | 7.29x | 5.11x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.88x | — | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.92x | 27.28x | 25.63x | 350.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RAVE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RAVE scores 8/9 vs YUM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.2% | — | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.8% | +14.5% | +22.8% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.6% | +18.7% | +48.1% | +9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.8% | +23.3% | +41.7% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $54.0B | $11.2B | $406M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $774M | $709M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $576,000 | $54.8B | $11.9B | $408M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.23x | 7.92x | 5.26x | 1.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RAVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RAVE five years ago would be worth $22,400 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,655 for DENN. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +43.3% total return vs MCD's -9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RAVE at 23.1% vs DENN's -16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.2% | -8.5% | +1.5% | +0.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.9% | -9.7% | +4.6% | +43.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.7% | -0.1% | +17.2% | -41.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.0% | +29.6% | +34.9% | -63.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.2% | +151.6% | +191.8% | -42.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.1% | -0.0% | +5.4% | -16.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MCD and DENN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCD is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DENN's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs RAVE's 74.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.12x | 0.19x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.75 | $341.75 | $169.39 | $6.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.25 | $274.83 | $137.33 | $3.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.7% | +80.7% | +89.7% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.9 | 30.5 | 47.8 | 66.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 3.0M | 1.6M | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
MCD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MCD as "Buy", YUM as "Hold", DENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.0% upside for MCD (target: $347) vs 12.0% for DENN (target: $7). For income investors, MCD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.59% vs YUM's 1.87%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $347.33 | $175.91 | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 62 | 51 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +1.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 27 | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $7.14 | $2.84 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +1.0% | +1.3% | +3.6% |
RAVE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MCD leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
RAVE vs MCD vs YUM vs DENN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAVE or MCD or YUM or DENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the stronger pick with 8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. (RAVE) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McDonald's Corporation (MCD) a "Buy" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RAVE or MCD or YUM or DENN?
On trailing P/E, RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc.
(RAVE) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Yum! Brands, Inc. at 27. 3x. On forward P/E, Denny's Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: McDonald's Corporation wins at 1. 54x versus Yum! Brands, Inc. 's 1. 65x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RAVE or MCD or YUM or DENN?
Over the past 5 years, RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc.
(RAVE) delivered a total return of +124. 0%, compared to -63. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: YUM returned +191. 8% versus RAVE's -44. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RAVE or MCD or YUM or DENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Denny's Corporation's 0. 65β — meaning DENN is approximately 451% more volatile than MCD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — RAVE or MCD or YUM or DENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is pulling ahead at 8. 8% versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Denny's Corporation grew EPS 17. 1% year-over-year, compared to 4. 9% for McDonald's Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, YUM leads at 6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RAVE or MCD or YUM or DENN?
McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
9% net margin versus 4. 8% for Denny's Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCD leads at 46. 1% versus 10. 0% for DENN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DENN leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RAVE or MCD or YUM or DENN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 54x versus Yum! Brands, Inc. 's 1. 65x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Denny's Corporation (DENN) trades at 15. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for Yum! Brands, Inc. — 7. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MCD: 26. 0% to $347. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — RAVE or MCD or YUM or DENN?
In this comparison, MCD (2.
6% yield), YUM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. RAVE, DENN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RAVE or MCD or YUM or DENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 6% yield, +151. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +151. 6%, DENN: -42. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RAVE and MCD and YUM and DENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RAVE is a small-cap deep-value stock; MCD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; YUM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock. MCD, YUM pay a dividend while RAVE, DENN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.