Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RBA vs KAR vs CPRT vs EBAY vs REZI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Specialty Business Services
Specialty Retail
Security & Protection Services
RBA vs KAR vs CPRT vs EBAY vs REZI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Retail | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $19.27B | $2.91B | $32.77B | $48.63B | $6.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.74B | $1.93B | $4.61B | $11.60B | $7.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $452M | $178M | $1.56B | $2.04B | $-527M |
| Gross Margin | 33.4% | 46.2% | 45.3% | 72.0% | 29.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 10.2% | 36.5% | 19.6% | 8.1% |
| Forward P/E | 23.7x | 19.3x | 21.5x | 17.4x | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $5.50B | $1.42B | $104M | $7.38B | $3.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $694M | $142M | $2.78B | $1.87B | $661M |
RBA vs KAR vs CPRT vs EBAY vs REZI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RB Global, Inc. (RBA) | 100 | 239.0 | +139.0% |
| OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) | 100 | 198.7 | +98.7% |
| Copart, Inc. (CPRT) | 100 | 151.5 | +51.5% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 233.7 | +133.7% |
| Resideo Technologie… (REZI) | 100 | 570.4 | +470.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RBA vs KAR vs CPRT vs EBAY vs REZI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RBA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 1.2%
KAR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 1.3% yield, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
CPRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 13.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 8.25x
- PEG 1.28 vs RBA's 3.82
- Beta 0.52, current ratio 8.25x
EBAY is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 369.5% 10Y total return vs RBA's 270.4%
REZI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 10.5% revenue growth vs EBAY's 7.9%
- +111.6% vs CPRT's -44.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs EBAY's 7.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.8% margin vs REZI's -7.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs REZI's 2.27, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +111.6% vs CPRT's -44.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.7% ROA vs REZI's -6.2%, ROIC 20.1% vs 9.0% |
RBA vs KAR vs CPRT vs EBAY vs REZI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RBA vs KAR vs CPRT vs EBAY vs REZI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CPRT leads in 2 of 6 categories
REZI leads 2 • RBA leads 0 • KAR leads 0 • EBAY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 6.0x KAR's $1.9B. CPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 33.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REZI's -7.1%. On growth, EBAY holds the edge at +19.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $1.9B | $4.6B | $11.6B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $288M | $1.9B | $2.6B | $802M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $452M | $178M | $1.6B | $2.0B | -$527M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $754M | $337M | $1.4B | $1.7B | -$1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.4% | +46.2% | +45.3% | +72.0% | +29.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +10.2% | +36.5% | +19.6% | +8.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +9.2% | +33.8% | +17.6% | -7.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +17.4% | +30.5% | +14.5% | -16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.4% | +0.5% | -3.6% | +19.5% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | +89.7% | -10.0% | +5.7% | +11.4% |
Valuation Metrics
REZI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, KAR trades at a 66% valuation discount to RBA's 49.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CPRT offers better value at 1.26x vs RBA's 8.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.3B | $2.9B | $32.8B | $48.6B | $6.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.1B | $4.2B | $30.1B | $54.1B | $8.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 49.72x | 16.73x | 21.30x | 24.52x | -10.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.65x | 19.31x | 21.49x | 17.40x | 13.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 8.02x | — | 1.26x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.27x | 14.55x | 15.73x | 21.03x | 10.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.12x | 1.51x | 7.05x | 4.38x | 0.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.19x | 1.93x | 3.60x | 10.61x | 2.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.33x | 8.66x | 26.62x | 29.28x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CPRT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-18 for REZI. CPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KAR scores 8/9 vs REZI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.5% | +11.6% | +15.9% | +44.1% | -18.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +3.8% | +14.7% | +11.5% | -6.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +6.9% | +20.1% | +16.8% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +9.4% | +19.7% | +17.4% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.91x | 0.93x | 0.01x | 1.60x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.8B | $1.3B | -$2.7B | $5.5B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $694M | $142M | $2.8B | $1.9B | $661M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.5B | $1.4B | $104M | $7.4B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.34x | 3.09x | — | 10.52x | -2.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REZI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,876 for CPRT. Over the past 12 months, REZI leads with a +111.6% total return vs CPRT's -44.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REZI at 34.9% vs CPRT's -5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.4% | -6.1% | -10.3% | +22.6% | +14.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.3% | +43.1% | -44.7% | +54.2% | +111.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.9% | +82.3% | -14.7% | +137.4% | +145.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.9% | +61.6% | +8.8% | +86.3% | +33.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +270.4% | +99.2% | +527.2% | +369.5% | +38.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.2% | +22.2% | -5.2% | +33.4% | +34.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CPRT and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REZI's 2.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EBAY currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs CPRT's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 0.98x | 0.52x | 0.73x | 2.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $119.58 | $31.78 | $63.85 | $111.38 | $45.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $93.58 | $19.02 | $32.20 | $67.87 | $18.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.5% | +86.3% | +53.0% | +95.5% | +88.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.0 | 40.9 | 47.5 | 63.1 | 61.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 976K | 7.8M | 5.4M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KAR and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RBA as "Buy", KAR as "Buy", CPRT as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", REZI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.9% upside for RBA (target: $124) vs -0.7% for REZI (target: $40). For income investors, KAR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.30% vs REZI's 0.58%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $124.00 | $32.00 | $40.50 | $109.67 | $40.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 18 | 19 | 68 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +1.3% | — | +1.1% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 7 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.22 | $0.36 | — | $1.15 | $0.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +5.1% | 0.0% |
CPRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). REZI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
RBA vs KAR vs CPRT vs EBAY vs REZI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RBA or KAR or CPRT or EBAY or REZI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Resideo Technologies, Inc.
(REZI) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for eBay Inc. (EBAY). OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (19. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RB Global, Inc. (RBA) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RBA or KAR or CPRT or EBAY or REZI?
On trailing P/E, OPENLANE, Inc.
(KAR) is the cheapest at 16. 7x versus RB Global, Inc. at 49. 7x. On forward P/E, Resideo Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Copart, Inc. wins at 1. 28x versus RB Global, Inc. 's 3. 82x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RBA or KAR or CPRT or EBAY or REZI?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to +8. 8% for Copart, Inc. (CPRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPRT returned +527. 2% versus REZI's +38. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RBA or KAR or CPRT or EBAY or REZI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Resideo Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 27β — meaning REZI is approximately 337% more volatile than CPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RBA or KAR or CPRT or EBAY or REZI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Resideo Technologies, Inc.
(REZI) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus 7. 9% for eBay Inc. (EBAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OPENLANE, Inc. grew EPS 264. 4% year-over-year, compared to -718. 0% for Resideo Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RBA leads at 39. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RBA or KAR or CPRT or EBAY or REZI?
Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 4% net margin versus -7. 1% for Resideo Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPRT leads at 36. 5% versus 8. 1% for REZI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RBA or KAR or CPRT or EBAY or REZI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 28x versus RB Global, Inc. 's 3. 82x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 23. 7x for RB Global, Inc. — 10. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RBA: 19. 9% to $124. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RBA or KAR or CPRT or EBAY or REZI?
In this comparison, KAR (1.
3% yield), RBA (1. 2% yield), EBAY (1. 1% yield), REZI (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. CPRT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RBA or KAR or CPRT or EBAY or REZI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +369. 5% 10Y return). Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +369. 5%, REZI: +38. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RBA and KAR and CPRT and EBAY and REZI?
These companies operate in different sectors (RBA (Industrials) and KAR (Consumer Cyclical) and CPRT (Industrials) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical) and REZI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RBA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KAR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CPRT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; REZI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RBA, KAR, EBAY, REZI pay a dividend while CPRT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.