Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RBCAA vs WSBC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
RBCAA vs WSBC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.34B | $3.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $521M | $1.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $131M | $223M |
| Gross Margin | 74.0% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | 31.8% | 19.7% |
| Forward P/E | 11.3x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $627M | $1.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $220M | $205M |
RBCAA vs WSBC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Republic Bancorp, I… (RBCAA) | 100 | 239.7 | +139.7% |
| WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) | 100 | 159.7 | +59.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RBCAA vs WSBC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RBCAA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 229.8% 10Y total return vs WSBC's 48.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 56.9%, current ratio 0.68x
- PEG 1.06 vs WSBC's 1.90
WSBC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 4.1%
- Rev growth 51.4%, EPS growth 0.0%
- 51.4% NII/revenue growth vs RBCAA's 4.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.4% NII/revenue growth vs RBCAA's 4.3% | |
| Value | PEG 1.06 vs 1.90 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs WSBC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs WSBC's 0.97 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs RBCAA's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.9% vs RBCAA's +11.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs WSBC's 0.4% |
RBCAA vs WSBC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RBCAA vs WSBC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RBCAA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 2.8x RBCAA's $521M. RBCAA is the more profitable business, keeping 25.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WSBC's 15.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $521M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $177M | $311M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $131M | $223M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $161M | $262M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.0% | +62.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.8% | +19.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +19.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.8% | +24.3% |
Valuation Metrics
RBCAA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, RBCAA trades at a 23% valuation discount to WSBC's 15.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RBCAA offers better value at 1.08x vs WSBC's 3.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.59x | 15.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.30x | 9.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.08x | 3.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.55x | 15.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.57x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 0.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.33x | 11.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RBCAA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RBCAA delivers a 12.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $6 for WSBC. WSBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RBCAA's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WSBC scores 8/9 vs RBCAA's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.3% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $407M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $220M | $205M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $627M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.60x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RBCAA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RBCAA five years ago would be worth $18,619 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,584 for WSBC. Over the past 12 months, WSBC leads with a +17.9% total return vs RBCAA's +11.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RBCAA at 27.8% vs WSBC's 18.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.7% | +3.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.0% | +17.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +108.9% | +65.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.2% | +5.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.8% | +48.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.8% | +18.2% |
Risk & Volatility
RBCAA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RBCAA is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSBC's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RBCAA currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs WSBC's 89.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.25 | $38.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $63.97 | $29.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.8 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 74K | 583K |
Analyst Outlook
WSBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RBCAA as "Buy" and WSBC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for WSBC (target: $42) vs -33.6% for RBCAA (target: $51). For income investors, WSBC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.08% vs RBCAA's 2.22%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.00 | $41.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.71 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +4.6% |
RBCAA leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WSBC leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
RBCAA vs WSBC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RBCAA or WSBC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, WesBanco, Inc.
(WSBC) is the stronger pick with 51. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA). Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RBCAA or WSBC?
On trailing P/E, Republic Bancorp, Inc.
(RBCAA) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus WesBanco, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, WesBanco, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Republic Bancorp, Inc. wins at 1. 06x versus WesBanco, Inc. 's 1. 90x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RBCAA or WSBC?
Over the past 5 years, Republic Bancorp, Inc.
(RBCAA) delivered a total return of +86. 2%, compared to +5. 8% for WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RBCAA returned +229. 8% versus WSBC's +48. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RBCAA or WSBC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Republic Bancorp, Inc.
(RBCAA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus WesBanco, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning WSBC is approximately 39% more volatile than RBCAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 57% for Republic Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RBCAA or WSBC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), WesBanco, Inc.
(WSBC) is pulling ahead at 51. 4% versus 4. 3% for Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Republic Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 28. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for WesBanco, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RBCAA or WSBC?
Republic Bancorp, Inc.
(RBCAA) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 2% net margin versus 15. 5% for WesBanco, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RBCAA leads at 31. 8% versus 19. 7% for WSBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RBCAA leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RBCAA or WSBC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 06x versus WesBanco, Inc. 's 1. 90x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 3x for Republic Bancorp, Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WSBC: 21. 3% to $41. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RBCAA or WSBC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 2% for Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA).
09Is RBCAA or WSBC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Republic Bancorp, Inc.
(RBCAA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69), 2. 2% yield, +229. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RBCAA: +229. 8%, WSBC: +48. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RBCAA and WSBC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RBCAA is a small-cap deep-value stock; WSBC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare RBCAA vs FFIN
FFIN is one of the most direct listed alternatives to RBCAA.
Compare WSBC vs FFIN
FFIN is one of the most direct listed alternatives to WSBC.
Expand With FFIN + IBCP
FFIN and IBCP are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.