Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RDVT vs IDN vs COHU vs TASK vs EFX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Semiconductors
Information Technology Services
Consulting Services
RDVT vs IDN vs COHU vs TASK vs EFX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Information Technology Services | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $693M | $157M | $2.23B | $573M | $21.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $94M | $0.00 | $481M | $1.21B | $6.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $1M | $-56M | $105M | $699M |
| Gross Margin | 84.2% | — | 25.7% | 35.5% | 44.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | — | -10.6% | 11.6% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 36.5x | 75.2x | 89.2x | 4.6x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $0.00 | $359M | $298M | $5.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $10M | $227M | $212M | $181M |
RDVT vs IDN vs COHU vs TASK vs EFX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) | 100 | 208.7 | +108.7% |
| Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN) | 100 | 92.8 | -7.2% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 129.1 | +29.1% |
| TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) | 100 | 18.6 | -81.4% |
| Equifax Inc. (EFX) | 100 | 73.3 | -26.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RDVT vs IDN vs COHU vs TASK vs EFX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RDVT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 82.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 2.8%, current ratio 7.18x
- 20.0% revenue growth vs IDN's -100.0%
- 15.0% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
IDN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.41 vs COHU's 2.13
COHU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 330.2% 10Y total return vs IDN's 322.3%
- +199.7% vs EFX's -33.2%
TASK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.18 vs EFX's 4.39
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 20.4x), PEG 0.18 vs 4.39
EFX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.87, yield 1.1%, current ratio 0.60x
- 1.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RDVT's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs IDN's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 20.4x), PEG 0.18 vs 4.39 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs COHU's -11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs COHU's 2.13 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RDVT's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +199.7% vs EFX's -33.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs COHU's -4.9%, ROIC 17.6% vs -5.7% |
RDVT vs IDN vs COHU vs TASK vs EFX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RDVT vs IDN vs COHU vs TASK vs EFX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RDVT leads in 2 of 6 categories
TASK leads 1 • COHU leads 1 • EFX leads 1 • IDN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EFX and IDN operate at a comparable scale, with $6.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. RDVT is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, COHU holds the edge at +29.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $94M | $0 | $481M | $1.2B | $6.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $23M | $2M | -$11M | $204M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $1M | -$56M | $105M | $699M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | $4M | $32M | $88M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.2% | — | +25.7% | +35.5% | +44.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | — | -10.6% | +11.6% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | — | -11.5% | +8.7% | +11.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | — | +6.6% | +7.3% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | -3.7% | +29.3% | +10.3% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.0% | -43.3% | +60.6% | +13.0% | +34.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TASK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.8x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 89% valuation discount to RDVT's 53.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TASK offers better value at 0.23x vs EFX's 7.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $693M | $157M | $2.2B | $573M | $21.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $652M | $148M | $2.4B | $660M | $26.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 53.95x | — | -29.86x | 5.79x | 33.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 36.50x | 75.22x | 89.21x | 4.58x | 20.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.23x | 7.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.38x | 72.52x | — | 3.26x | 14.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.68x | — | 4.93x | 0.48x | 3.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.00x | 7.59x | 2.82x | 0.99x | 4.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.07x | 35.01x | 207.83x | 7.78x | 18.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RDVT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TASK delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-7 for COHU. RDVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EFX's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RDVT scores 7/9 vs COHU's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.0% | +6.8% | -6.8% | +21.2% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.8% | +5.2% | -4.9% | +10.3% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.6% | — | -5.7% | +16.3% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.7% | — | -5.9% | +16.7% | +11.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — | 0.46x | 0.50x | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$41M | -$10M | $132M | $86M | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $10M | $227M | $212M | $181M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $0 | $359M | $298M | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -168.82x | 7.12x | 5.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COHU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RDVT five years ago would be worth $25,591 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,223 for TASK. Over the past 12 months, COHU leads with a +199.7% total return vs EFX's -33.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IDN at 51.7% vs TASK's -6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.4% | +17.5% | +92.9% | -12.3% | -17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.3% | +193.2% | +199.7% | -28.3% | -33.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.9% | +249.4% | +40.7% | -18.1% | -9.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.9% | -4.1% | +22.2% | -67.8% | -23.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.4% | +322.3% | +330.2% | -67.8% | +58.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.2% | +51.7% | +12.1% | -6.4% | -3.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IDN and COHU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IDN is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COHU's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COHU currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs TASK's 34.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 0.41x | 2.13x | 1.12x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.14 | $9.07 | $50.68 | $18.39 | $281.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.62 | $2.60 | $15.34 | $5.89 | $166.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.5% | +85.7% | +93.7% | +34.6% | +62.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.8 | 51.0 | 75.5 | 42.0 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 118K | 384K | 953K | 736K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
EFX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RDVT as "Buy", IDN as "Buy", COHU as "Buy", TASK as "Buy", EFX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.9% upside for TASK (target: $14) vs 4.8% for COHU (target: $50). For income investors, EFX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.07% vs RDVT's 0.59%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.00 | $8.50 | $49.75 | $13.50 | $227.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 7 | 14 | 11 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | — | — | — | $1.88 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +4.8% | +4.4% |
RDVT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TASK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RDVT vs IDN vs COHU vs TASK vs EFX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RDVT or IDN or COHU or TASK or EFX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Red Violet, Inc.
(RDVT) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RDVT or IDN or COHU or TASK or EFX?
On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus Red Violet, Inc. at 53. 9x. On forward P/E, TaskUs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TaskUs, Inc. wins at 0. 18x versus Equifax Inc. 's 4. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RDVT or IDN or COHU or TASK or EFX?
Over the past 5 years, Red Violet, Inc.
(RDVT) delivered a total return of +155. 9%, compared to -67. 8% for TaskUs, Inc. (TASK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COHU returned +330. 2% versus TASK's -67. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RDVT or IDN or COHU or TASK or EFX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intellicheck, Inc.
(IDN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus Cohu, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning COHU is approximately 418% more volatile than IDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 107% for Equifax Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RDVT or IDN or COHU or TASK or EFX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Red Violet, Inc.
(RDVT) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -100. 0% for Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -6. 7% for Cohu, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RDVT leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RDVT or IDN or COHU or TASK or EFX?
Red Violet, Inc.
(RDVT) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 6% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EFX leads at 18. 0% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RDVT leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RDVT or IDN or COHU or TASK or EFX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 18x versus Equifax Inc. 's 4. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 84. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TASK: 111. 9% to $13. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RDVT or IDN or COHU or TASK or EFX?
In this comparison, EFX (1.
1% yield), RDVT (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. IDN, COHU, TASK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RDVT or IDN or COHU or TASK or EFX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intellicheck, Inc.
(IDN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), +322. 3% 10Y return). Cohu, Inc. (COHU) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDN: +322. 3%, COHU: +330. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RDVT and IDN and COHU and TASK and EFX?
These companies operate in different sectors (RDVT (Technology) and IDN (Technology) and COHU (Technology) and TASK (Technology) and EFX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RDVT is a small-cap high-growth stock; IDN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock; EFX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. RDVT, EFX pay a dividend while IDN, COHU, TASK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.