Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RERE
ATRenew Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.-69.8%
EBAY
eBay Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$48.63B
5Y Perf.+51.6%
BACK
IMAC Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$78K
5Y Perf.-99.9%
CPRT
Copart, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$32.77B
5Y Perf.+2.8%
AAPL
Apple Inc.

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.22T
5Y Perf.+109.9%

RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RERE logoRERE
EBAY logoEBAY
BACK logoBACK
CPRT logoCPRT
AAPL logoAAPL
IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailMedical - Care FacilitiesSpecialty Business ServicesConsumer Electronics
Market Cap$1.10B$48.63B$78K$32.77B$4.22T
Revenue (TTM)$18.54B$11.60B$23K$4.61B$451.44B
Net Income (TTM)$210M$2.04B$-10M$1.56B$122.58B
Gross Margin20.5%72.0%-18.4%45.3%47.9%
Operating Margin1.3%19.6%-398.1%36.5%32.6%
Forward P/E1.5x17.4x21.5x33.8x
Total Debt$355M$7.38B$0.00$104M$112.38B
Cash & Equiv.$1.97B$1.87B$504K$2.78B$35.93B

RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RERE
EBAY
BACK
CPRT
AAPL
StockJun 21May 26Return
ATRenew Inc. (RERE)10030.2-69.8%
eBay Inc. (EBAY)100151.6+51.6%
IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK)1000.1-99.9%
Copart, Inc. (CPRT)100102.8+2.8%
Apple Inc. (AAPL)100209.9+109.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RERE leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. IMAC Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. CPRT and AAPL also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
RERE
ATRenew Inc.
The Growth Play

RERE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 25.9%, EPS growth 94.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.0%
  • 25.9% revenue growth vs BACK's -98.6%
  • Lower P/E (1.5x vs 33.8x)
  • +97.4% vs CPRT's -44.7%
Best for: growth exposure
EBAY
eBay Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, EBAY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
BACK
IMAC Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

BACK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 100.0%
  • Beta 0.05, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.09x
  • Beta 0.05 vs RERE's 1.36
  • 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
CPRT
Copart, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CPRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 8.25x
  • PEG 1.28 vs AAPL's 1.89
  • 33.8% margin vs BACK's -426.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
AAPL
Apple Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 11.7% 10Y total return vs CPRT's 5.3%
  • 34.0% ROA vs BACK's -31.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRERE logoRERE25.9% revenue growth vs BACK's -98.6%
ValueRERE logoRERELower P/E (1.5x vs 33.8x)
Quality / MarginsCPRT logoCPRT33.8% margin vs BACK's -426.9%
Stability / SafetyBACK logoBACKBeta 0.05 vs RERE's 1.36
DividendsBACK logoBACK100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)RERE logoRERE+97.4% vs CPRT's -44.7%
Efficiency (ROA)AAPL logoAAPL34.0% ROA vs BACK's -31.3%

RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

REREATRenew Inc.
FY 2024
Product
90.9%$14.8B
Service
9.1%$1.5B
EBAYeBay Inc.
FY 2025
Marketplaces
82.0%$9.1B
Advertising Revenues
18.0%$2.0B
BACKIMAC Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CPRTCopart, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
85.4%$4.0B
Product
14.6%$678M
AAPLApple Inc.
FY 2025
iPhone
50.4%$209.6B
Service
26.2%$109.2B
Wearables, Home and Accessories
8.6%$35.7B
Mac
8.1%$33.7B
iPad
6.7%$28.0B

RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRERELAGGINGBACK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CPRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 19867183.0x BACK's $22,723. CPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 33.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BACK's -426.9%. On growth, RERE holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRERE logoREREATRenew Inc.EBAY logoEBAYeBay Inc.BACK logoBACKIMAC Holdings, In…CPRT logoCPRTCopart, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$18.5B$11.6B$22,723$4.6B$451.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$501M$2.6B-$9M$1.9B$160.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$210M$2.0B-$10M$1.6B$122.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$1.7B-$5M$1.4B$129.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+20.5%+72.0%-18.4%+45.3%+47.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.3%+19.6%-398.1%+36.5%+32.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.1%+17.6%-426.9%+33.8%+27.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.6%+14.5%-215.1%+30.5%+28.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+32.2%+19.5%-62.3%-3.6%+16.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.4%+5.7%+26.3%-10.0%+21.8%
CPRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RERE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 21.3x trailing earnings, CPRT trades at a 45% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CPRT offers better value at 1.26x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricRERE logoREREATRenew Inc.EBAY logoEBAYeBay Inc.BACK logoBACKIMAC Holdings, In…CPRT logoCPRTCopart, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$48.6B$77,541$32.8B$4.22T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$858M$54.1B-$426,648$30.1B$4.30T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-907.40x24.52x-0.00x21.30x38.53x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1.46x17.40x21.49x33.78x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.26x2.16x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.11x21.03x15.73x29.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.46x4.38x1.08x7.05x10.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.02x10.61x3.60x58.49x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.79x29.28x26.62x42.72x
RERE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $6 for RERE. CPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs BACK's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricRERE logoREREATRenew Inc.EBAY logoEBAYeBay Inc.BACK logoBACKIMAC Holdings, In…CPRT logoCPRTCopart, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.5%+44.1%+15.9%+146.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.0%+11.5%-31.3%+14.7%+34.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.0%+16.8%+20.1%+67.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.8%+17.4%+19.7%+69.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976168
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x1.60x0.01x1.52x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1.6B$5.5B-$504,189-$2.7B$76.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.0B$1.9B$504,189$2.8B$35.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$355M$7.4B$0$104M$112.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense23.67x10.52x-28.20x
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EBAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for BACK. Over the past 12 months, RERE leads with a +97.4% total return vs CPRT's -44.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EBAY at 33.4% vs BACK's -80.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRERE logoREREATRenew Inc.EBAY logoEBAYeBay Inc.BACK logoBACKIMAC Holdings, In…CPRT logoCPRTCopart, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-14.8%+22.6%-69.7%-10.3%+6.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+97.4%+54.2%+19.4%-44.7%+47.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+113.9%+137.4%-99.2%-14.7%+67.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-73.2%+86.3%-99.9%+8.8%+124.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-73.2%+369.5%-100.0%+527.2%+1174.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+28.8%+33.4%-80.2%-5.2%+18.7%
EBAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BACK and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BACK is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RERE's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs BACK's 18.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRERE logoREREATRenew Inc.EBAY logoEBAYeBay Inc.BACK logoBACKIMAC Holdings, In…CPRT logoCPRTCopart, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.36x0.73x0.05x0.52x0.99x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.47$111.38$0.21$63.85$292.13
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.34$67.87$0.03$32.20$193.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+69.9%+95.5%+18.2%+53.0%+98.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.963.140.247.569.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M5.4M3K7.8M39.8M
Evenly matched — BACK and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BACK and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: RERE as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", CPRT as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.6% upside for CPRT (target: $41) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). For income investors, BACK offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs AAPL's 0.36%.

MetricRERE logoREREATRenew Inc.EBAY logoEBAYeBay Inc.BACK logoBACKIMAC Holdings, In…CPRT logoCPRTCopart, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$109.67$40.50$317.11
# AnalystsCovering analysts26819110
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+100.0%+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises7114
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.15$0.80$1.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.5%+5.1%0.0%0.0%+2.1%
Evenly matched — BACK and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CPRT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). RERE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallATRenew Inc. (RERE)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ATRenew Inc.

(RERE) is the stronger pick with 25. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 6% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). Copart, Inc. (CPRT) offers the better valuation at 21. 3x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ATRenew Inc. (RERE) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL?

On trailing P/E, Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is the cheapest at 21. 3x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, ATRenew Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Copart, Inc. wins at 1. 28x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL?

Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) delivered a total return of +124. 4%, compared to -99. 9% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus BACK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IMAC Holdings, Inc.

(BACK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus ATRenew Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning RERE is approximately 2874% more volatile than BACK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ATRenew Inc.

(RERE) is pulling ahead at 25. 9% versus -98. 6% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ATRenew Inc. grew EPS 94. 7% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for IMAC Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RERE leads at 28. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL?

Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 4% net margin versus -125. 5% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPRT leads at 36. 5% versus -78. 0% for BACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 28x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, ATRenew Inc. (RERE) trades at 1. 5x forward P/E versus 33. 8x for Apple Inc. — 32. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPRT: 19. 6% to $40. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL?

In this comparison, BACK (100.

0% yield), EBAY (1. 1% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. RERE, CPRT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, IMAC Holdings, Inc.

(BACK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BACK: -100. 0%, RERE: -73. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RERE and EBAY and BACK and CPRT and AAPL?

These companies operate in different sectors (RERE (Consumer Cyclical) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical) and BACK (Healthcare) and CPRT (Industrials) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: RERE is a small-cap high-growth stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CPRT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. EBAY, BACK pay a dividend while RERE, CPRT, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

RERE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EBAY

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BACK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $2B
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CPRT

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AAPL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RERE and EBAY and BACK and CPRT and AAPL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RERE: 32.2% · EBAY: 19.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.