Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Medical - Care Facilities
Specialty Business Services
Consumer Electronics
RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Medical - Care Facilities | Specialty Business Services | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $48.63B | $78K | $32.77B | $4.22T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.54B | $11.60B | $23K | $4.61B | $451.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $210M | $2.04B | $-10M | $1.56B | $122.58B |
| Gross Margin | 20.5% | 72.0% | -18.4% | 45.3% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 19.6% | -398.1% | 36.5% | 32.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.5x | 17.4x | — | 21.5x | 33.8x |
| Total Debt | $355M | $7.38B | $0.00 | $104M | $112.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.97B | $1.87B | $504K | $2.78B | $35.93B |
RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATRenew Inc. (RERE) | 100 | 30.2 | -69.8% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 151.6 | +51.6% |
| IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Copart, Inc. (CPRT) | 100 | 102.8 | +2.8% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 209.9 | +109.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RERE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 25.9%, EPS growth 94.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.0%
- 25.9% revenue growth vs BACK's -98.6%
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 33.8x)
- +97.4% vs CPRT's -44.7%
Among these 5 stocks, EBAY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BACK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 100.0%
- Beta 0.05, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.09x
- Beta 0.05 vs RERE's 1.36
- 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
CPRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 8.25x
- PEG 1.28 vs AAPL's 1.89
- 33.8% margin vs BACK's -426.9%
AAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs CPRT's 5.3%
- 34.0% ROA vs BACK's -31.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.9% revenue growth vs BACK's -98.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 33.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.8% margin vs BACK's -426.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs RERE's 1.36 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.4% vs CPRT's -44.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs BACK's -31.3% |
RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CPRT leads in 1 of 6 categories
RERE leads 1 • AAPL leads 1 • EBAY leads 1 • BACK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 19867183.0x BACK's $22,723. CPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 33.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BACK's -426.9%. On growth, RERE holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.5B | $11.6B | $22,723 | $4.6B | $451.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $501M | $2.6B | -$9M | $1.9B | $160.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $210M | $2.0B | -$10M | $1.6B | $122.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $1.7B | -$5M | $1.4B | $129.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +72.0% | -18.4% | +45.3% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +19.6% | -398.1% | +36.5% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +17.6% | -426.9% | +33.8% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +14.5% | -215.1% | +30.5% | +28.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.2% | +19.5% | -62.3% | -3.6% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +5.7% | +26.3% | -10.0% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
RERE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.3x trailing earnings, CPRT trades at a 45% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CPRT offers better value at 1.26x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $48.6B | $77,541 | $32.8B | $4.22T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $858M | $54.1B | -$426,648 | $30.1B | $4.30T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -907.40x | 24.52x | -0.00x | 21.30x | 38.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.46x | 17.40x | — | 21.49x | 33.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.26x | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.11x | 21.03x | — | 15.73x | 29.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 4.38x | 1.08x | 7.05x | 10.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.02x | 10.61x | — | 3.60x | 58.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.79x | 29.28x | — | 26.62x | 42.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $6 for RERE. CPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs BACK's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +44.1% | — | +15.9% | +146.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +11.5% | -31.3% | +14.7% | +34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +16.8% | — | +20.1% | +67.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.8% | +17.4% | — | +19.7% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 1.60x | — | 0.01x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | $5.5B | -$504,189 | -$2.7B | $76.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.0B | $1.9B | $504,189 | $2.8B | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $355M | $7.4B | $0 | $104M | $112.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 23.67x | 10.52x | -28.20x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EBAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for BACK. Over the past 12 months, RERE leads with a +97.4% total return vs CPRT's -44.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EBAY at 33.4% vs BACK's -80.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.8% | +22.6% | -69.7% | -10.3% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.4% | +54.2% | +19.4% | -44.7% | +47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.9% | +137.4% | -99.2% | -14.7% | +67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.2% | +86.3% | -99.9% | +8.8% | +124.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.2% | +369.5% | -100.0% | +527.2% | +1174.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.8% | +33.4% | -80.2% | -5.2% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BACK and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BACK is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RERE's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs BACK's 18.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 0.73x | 0.05x | 0.52x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.47 | $111.38 | $0.21 | $63.85 | $292.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.34 | $67.87 | $0.03 | $32.20 | $193.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +95.5% | +18.2% | +53.0% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.9 | 63.1 | 40.2 | 47.5 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 5.4M | 3K | 7.8M | 39.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BACK and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RERE as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", CPRT as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.6% upside for CPRT (target: $41) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). For income investors, BACK offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs AAPL's 0.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $109.67 | — | $40.50 | $317.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 68 | — | 19 | 110 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | +100.0% | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 7 | 1 | — | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.15 | $0.80 | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.1% |
CPRT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). RERE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
RERE vs EBAY vs BACK vs CPRT vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ATRenew Inc.
(RERE) is the stronger pick with 25. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 6% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). Copart, Inc. (CPRT) offers the better valuation at 21. 3x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ATRenew Inc. (RERE) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the cheapest at 21. 3x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, ATRenew Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Copart, Inc. wins at 1. 28x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) delivered a total return of +124. 4%, compared to -99. 9% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus BACK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IMAC Holdings, Inc.
(BACK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus ATRenew Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning RERE is approximately 2874% more volatile than BACK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ATRenew Inc.
(RERE) is pulling ahead at 25. 9% versus -98. 6% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ATRenew Inc. grew EPS 94. 7% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for IMAC Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RERE leads at 28. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL?
Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 4% net margin versus -125. 5% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPRT leads at 36. 5% versus -78. 0% for BACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 28x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, ATRenew Inc. (RERE) trades at 1. 5x forward P/E versus 33. 8x for Apple Inc. — 32. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPRT: 19. 6% to $40. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL?
In this comparison, BACK (100.
0% yield), EBAY (1. 1% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. RERE, CPRT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RERE or EBAY or BACK or CPRT or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IMAC Holdings, Inc.
(BACK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BACK: -100. 0%, RERE: -73. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RERE and EBAY and BACK and CPRT and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (RERE (Consumer Cyclical) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical) and BACK (Healthcare) and CPRT (Industrials) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RERE is a small-cap high-growth stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CPRT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. EBAY, BACK pay a dividend while RERE, CPRT, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.