RLGT vs XPO

For growth investors, Radiant Logistics, Inc.

(RLGT) is the stronger pick with 12. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO). Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E (34. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Radiant Logistics, Inc.

(RLGT) is the cheapest at 23. 7x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. at 78. 3x. On forward P/E, Radiant Logistics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 34. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: XPO Logistics, Inc. wins at 1. 59x versus Radiant Logistics, Inc. 's 3. 23x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.

(XPO) delivered a total return of +306. 8%, compared to +16. 9% for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 5% versus RLGT's +120. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Radiant Logistics, Inc.

(RLGT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus XPO Logistics, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning XPO is approximately 49% more volatile than RLGT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 3% for XPO Logistics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Radiant Logistics, Inc.

(RLGT) is pulling ahead at 12. 5% versus 1. 1% for XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Radiant Logistics, Inc. grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to -18. 3% for XPO Logistics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XPO leads at 1. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

XPO Logistics, Inc.

(XPO) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 9% net margin versus 1. 9% for Radiant Logistics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XPO leads at 8. 9% versus 2. 3% for RLGT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RLGT leads at 17. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 59x versus Radiant Logistics, Inc. 's 3. 23x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) trades at 34. 7x forward P/E versus 43. 9x for XPO Logistics, Inc. — 9. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RLGT: 8. 3% to $9. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Radiant Logistics, Inc.

(RLGT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 16), +120. 4% 10Y return). XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RLGT: +120. 4%, XPO: +21. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.