Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RLI vs RNR vs KNSL vs ACGL vs MKL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Reinsurance
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Diversified
Insurance - Property & Casualty
RLI vs RNR vs KNSL vs ACGL vs MKL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Reinsurance | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $4.56B | $12.98B | $7.15B | $33.67B | $22.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.90B | $11.49B | $1.92B | $19.93B | $16.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $395M | $3.09B | $527M | $4.40B | $1.77B |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | 44.6% | 36.9% | 37.2% | 61.4% |
| Operating Margin | 26.7% | 35.5% | 27.2% | 25.0% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.9x | 7.7x | 15.0x | 10.1x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $100M | $2.33B | $224M | $2.73B | $4.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52M | $1.73B | $163M | $993M | $3.96B |
RLI vs RNR vs KNSL vs ACGL vs MKL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RLI Corp. (RLI) | 100 | 125.7 | +25.7% |
| RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR) | 100 | 179.2 | +79.2% |
| Kinsale Capital Gro… (KNSL) | 100 | 206.8 | +106.8% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 334.9 | +234.9% |
| Markel Corporation (MKL) | 100 | 200.6 | +100.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RLI vs RNR vs KNSL vs ACGL vs MKL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RLI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 5.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KNSL's 0.2%
RNR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.26 vs RLI's 0.88
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 16.0x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.64
- +21.9% vs KNSL's -32.7%
KNSL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth 21.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.7%
- 18.0% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0%
- Combined ratio 0.7 vs MKL's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting)
ACGL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 324.0% 10Y total return vs KNSL's 16.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.02, yield 0.0%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.02 vs MKL's 0.44, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, MKL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 16.0x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs MKL's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs MKL's 0.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KNSL's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.9% vs KNSL's -32.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs MKL's 3.0%, ROIC 26.6% vs 10.7% |
RLI vs RNR vs KNSL vs ACGL vs MKL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RLI vs RNR vs KNSL vs ACGL vs MKL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RNR leads in 3 of 6 categories
KNSL leads 1 • RLI leads 1 • ACGL leads 0 • MKL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNSL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 10.5x RLI's $1.9B. KNSL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MKL's 10.7%. On growth, KNSL holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $11.5B | $1.9B | $19.9B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $512M | $4.1B | $533M | $5.2B | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $395M | $3.1B | $527M | $4.4B | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $551M | $4.2B | $1.0B | $6.1B | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +44.6% | +36.9% | +37.2% | +61.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +35.5% | +27.2% | +25.0% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +26.9% | +27.5% | +22.1% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +36.7% | +52.9% | +30.7% | +13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | -36.4% | +10.2% | +7.3% | +6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.8% | +100.9% | -100.0% | +39.0% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
RNR leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, RNR trades at a 63% valuation discount to KNSL's 14.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RNR offers better value at 0.18x vs RLI's 0.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $13.0B | $7.2B | $33.7B | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $13.6B | $7.2B | $35.4B | $22.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.38x | 5.31x | 14.26x | 8.13x | 10.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.94x | 7.66x | 14.96x | 10.05x | 15.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.56x | 0.18x | 0.35x | 0.29x | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.76x | 3.38x | 11.27x | 6.85x | 7.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.42x | 1.02x | 3.82x | 1.69x | 1.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.57x | 0.70x | 3.67x | 1.47x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.49x | 3.51x | 7.22x | 5.50x | 8.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RLI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KNSL delivers a 28.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $10 for MKL. RLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKL's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RLI scores 8/9 vs MKL's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.0% | +16.6% | +28.0% | +19.0% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | +5.7% | +9.1% | +5.9% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.8% | +16.0% | +26.6% | +15.4% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +10.7% | +14.2% | +11.6% | +14.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.12x | 0.11x | 0.11x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $48M | $598M | $61M | $1.7B | $339M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $1.7B | $163M | $993M | $4.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $100M | $2.3B | $224M | $2.7B | $4.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 80.31x | 33.28x | 47.02x | 34.86x | 12.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,931 for RLI. Over the past 12 months, RNR leads with a +21.9% total return vs KNSL's -32.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RNR at 13.4% vs RLI's -6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.3% | +10.6% | -21.2% | +0.7% | -15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.3% | +21.9% | -32.7% | +2.0% | -4.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.2% | +45.7% | -6.9% | +30.7% | +31.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.3% | +87.1% | +85.2% | +144.0% | +47.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.0% | +176.9% | +1606.7% | +324.0% | +89.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.5% | +13.4% | -2.3% | +9.3% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
RNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNR is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MKL's 0.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RNR currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs KNSL's 60.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.01x | -0.03x | 0.29x | 0.02x | 0.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $77.24 | $318.20 | $512.76 | $103.39 | $2207.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $48.66 | $231.17 | $293.78 | $82.45 | $1719.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.2% | +94.5% | +60.2% | +91.4% | +81.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 23.5 | 46.9 | 26.3 | 46.3 | 34.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 675K | 303K | 256K | 1.9M | 59K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RLI and KNSL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RLI as "Hold", RNR as "Hold", KNSL as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy", MKL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for KNSL (target: $433) vs 2.5% for RNR (target: $308). For income investors, RLI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.28% vs KNSL's 0.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $56.33 | $308.33 | $433.00 | $104.00 | $1950.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 28 | 13 | 34 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.3% | +0.6% | +0.2% | +0.0% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.62 | $1.67 | $0.68 | $0.02 | $48.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.3% | +1.3% | +5.6% | +1.9% |
RNR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). KNSL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
RLI vs RNR vs KNSL vs ACGL vs MKL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RLI or RNR or KNSL or ACGL or MKL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RLI or RNR or KNSL or ACGL or MKL?
On trailing P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. at 14. 3x. On forward P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. wins at 0. 26x versus RLI Corp. 's 0. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RLI or RNR or KNSL or ACGL or MKL?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +144. 0%, compared to +9. 3% for RLI Corp. (RLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KNSL returned +1607% versus MKL's +89. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RLI or RNR or KNSL or ACGL or MKL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus Markel Corporation's 0. 44β — meaning MKL is approximately -1479% more volatile than RNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RLI Corp. (RLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 23% for Markel Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RLI or RNR or KNSL or ACGL or MKL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 60. 8% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Markel Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RLI or RNR or KNSL or ACGL or MKL?
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus 12. 7% for Markel Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KNSL leads at 33. 8% versus 16. 5% for MKL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKL leads at 69. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RLI or RNR or KNSL or ACGL or MKL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus RLI Corp. 's 0. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 17. 9x for RLI Corp. — 10. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KNSL: 40. 2% to $433. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RLI or RNR or KNSL or ACGL or MKL?
In this comparison, RLI (5.
3% yield), MKL (2. 7% yield), RNR (0. 6% yield), KNSL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ACGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RLI or RNR or KNSL or ACGL or MKL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), +1607% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KNSL: +1607%, MKL: +89. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RLI and RNR and KNSL and ACGL and MKL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RLI is a small-cap deep-value stock; RNR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; KNSL is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MKL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. RLI, RNR, MKL pay a dividend while KNSL, ACGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.