Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RLYB vs TPST vs IMVT vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
RLYB vs TPST vs IMVT vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $81M | $56M | $5.88B | $9.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $674K | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-36M | $-464M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | 95.5% | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -56.8% | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $154K | $15M | $98K | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $30M | $714M | $357M |
RLYB vs TPST vs IMVT vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) | 100 | 10.6 | -89.4% |
| Tempest Therapeutic… (TPST) | 100 | 13.2 | -86.8% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 276.7 | +176.7% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 141.0 | +41.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RLYB vs TPST vs IMVT vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RLYB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.10
- Rev growth -18.4%, EPS growth 27.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 10.87x
- Beta 1.10, current ratio 10.87x
TPST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- -2.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 190.9% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.9%
- 3.2% margin vs RLYB's -21.0%
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.7% vs TPST's -70.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs RLYB's -21.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs TPST's 1.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs TPST's -70.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -23.2% ROA vs TPST's -210.5%, ROIC -69.8% vs -5.1% |
RLYB vs TPST vs IMVT vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RLYB vs TPST vs IMVT vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RLYB leads in 1 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • TPST leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RLYB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RLYB and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $674,000 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $674,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$38M | -$36M | -$487M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$36M | -$464M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | -$33M | -$423M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.5% | — | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -56.8% | — | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.0% | — | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.9% | — | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.1% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | -92.7% | +19.7% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RLYB and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $81M | $56M | $5.9B | $9.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $67M | $41M | $5.2B | $9.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.35x | -1.33x | -10.60x | -24.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 127.35x | — | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.27x | 2.90x | 6.20x | 8.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RLYB and PRAX each lead in 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RLYB delivers a -25.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-6 for TPST. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPST's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RLYB scores 4/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.2% | -5.7% | -47.1% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.2% | -2.1% | -44.1% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -69.8% | -5.1% | — | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -71.9% | -121.0% | -66.1% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.80x | 0.00x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$14M | -$15M | -$714M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $30M | $714M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $154,000 | $15M | $98,000 | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -78.41x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $18,445 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,228 for TPST. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +767.1% total return vs TPST's -70.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.0% vs TPST's -57.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +154.1% | -32.5% | +11.7% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +514.5% | -70.9% | +102.4% | +767.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.0% | -92.5% | +49.8% | +1956.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.3% | -87.7% | +84.4% | -14.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.3% | -99.9% | +190.9% | -20.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.1% | -57.9% | +14.4% | +174.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RLYB and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RLYB is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPST's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs TPST's 16.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.61x | 1.36x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.31 | $12.23 | $30.09 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.58 | $1.50 | $13.36 | $35.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.9% | +16.3% | +96.2% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 90.1 | 51.0 | 50.6 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 393K | 206K | 1.4M | 376K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RLYB as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.3% upside for PRAX (target: $549) vs 57.2% for IMVT (target: $46).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $45.50 | $548.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — | 23 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RLYB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
RLYB vs TPST vs IMVT vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RLYB or TPST or IMVT or PRAX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RLYB or TPST or IMVT or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +84. 4%, compared to -87. 7% for Tempest Therapeutics, Inc. (TPST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +190. 9% versus TPST's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RLYB or TPST or IMVT or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
10β versus Tempest Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning TPST is approximately 47% more volatile than RLYB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 80% for Tempest Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RLYB or TPST or IMVT or PRAX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rallybio Corporation grew EPS 27.
7% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RLYB or TPST or IMVT or PRAX?
Tempest Therapeutics, Inc.
(TPST) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -90. 8% for Rallybio Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPST leads at 0. 0% versus -95. 1% for RLYB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RLYB leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RLYB or TPST or IMVT or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RLYB or TPST or IMVT or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
10)). Tempest Therapeutics, Inc. (TPST) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RLYB: -87. 3%, TPST: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RLYB and TPST and IMVT and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.