Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RMAX vs OPAD vs OPEN vs EXPI vs COMP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Real Estate - Services
Real Estate - Services
Software - Application
RMAX vs OPAD vs OPEN vs EXPI vs COMP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $223M | $22M | $4.08B | $1.09B | $5.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $292M | $487M | $3.94B | $4.77B | $8.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $-41M | $-1.39B | $-23M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 70.8% | 7.6% | 7.9% | 7.0% | 10.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.4% | -6.3% | -9.9% | -0.4% | -4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | — | — | 96.3x | 53.5x |
| Total Debt | $459M | $0.00 | $193M | $0.00 | $454M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $27M | $962M | $124M | $199M |
RMAX vs OPAD vs OPEN vs EXPI vs COMP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RE/MAX Holdings, In… (RMAX) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| Offerpad Solutions … (OPAD) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 26.2 | -73.8% |
| eXp World Holdings,… (EXPI) | 100 | 19.6 | -80.4% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 46.0 | -54.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RMAX vs OPAD vs OPEN vs EXPI vs COMP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RMAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.39, yield 0.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, current ratio 1.69x
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 53.5x)
- 2.8% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
Among these 5 stocks, OPAD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
OPEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +5.1% vs OPAD's -35.5%
EXPI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs OPEN's -50.8%
- Beta 1.57, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.53x
- 2.9% yield, vs RMAX's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
COMP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 23.7% revenue growth vs OPAD's -38.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.7% revenue growth vs OPAD's -38.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 53.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.8% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs OPAD's 3.65 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, vs RMAX's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs OPAD's -35.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 10.9% vs -15.8% |
RMAX vs OPAD vs OPEN vs EXPI vs COMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RMAX vs OPAD vs OPEN vs EXPI vs COMP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RMAX leads in 3 of 6 categories
OPAD leads 1 • COMP leads 1 • EXPI leads 1 • OPEN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RMAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 28.5x RMAX's $292M. RMAX is the more profitable business, keeping 2.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $292M | $487M | $3.9B | $4.8B | $8.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | -$30M | -$363M | -$12M | -$100M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | -$41M | -$1.4B | -$23M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $34M | $86M | $1.1B | $108M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.8% | +7.6% | +7.9% | +7.0% | +10.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | -6.3% | -9.9% | -0.4% | -4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | -8.5% | -35.2% | -0.5% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +17.6% | +27.2% | +2.3% | +0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.8% | -50.2% | -37.6% | +8.5% | +99.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -76.2% | +60.0% | -50.0% | -24.4% | +133.3% |
Valuation Metrics
OPAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RMAX's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COMP's 66.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $223M | $22M | $4.1B | $1.1B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $564M | -$5M | $3.3B | $961M | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.65x | -0.47x | -3.13x | -48.14x | -87.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.56x | — | — | 96.29x | 53.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.90x | — | — | — | 66.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 0.04x | 0.93x | 0.23x | 0.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.69x | 4.06x | 4.43x | 6.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.65x | 0.33x | 3.93x | 9.95x | 26.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RMAX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COMP delivers a 1.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. OPEN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COMP's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RMAX scores 6/9 vs COMP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -111.7% | -163.2% | -9.4% | +1.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | -20.8% | -53.6% | -5.1% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | -18.6% | -15.8% | -15.3% | -2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.5% | -52.1% | -11.7% | -9.6% | -2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.19x | — | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $341M | -$27M | -$769M | -$124M | $255M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $27M | $962M | $124M | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $459M | $0 | $193M | $0 | $454M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.62x | -4.56x | -8.92x | — | -0.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COMP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COMP five years ago would be worth $5,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $48 for OPAD. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs OPAD's -35.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 49.1% vs OPAD's -54.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.5% | -46.6% | -12.4% | -25.4% | -16.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.4% | -35.5% | +510.1% | -7.0% | +14.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | -90.7% | +159.5% | -44.1% | +231.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.2% | -99.5% | -71.6% | -72.9% | -48.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.8% | -99.5% | -50.8% | +703.2% | -56.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.2% | -54.8% | +37.4% | -17.6% | +49.1% |
Risk & Volatility
RMAX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RMAX is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPAD's 3.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RMAX currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs OPAD's 11.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 3.65x | 3.09x | 1.57x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.62 | $6.35 | $10.87 | $12.23 | $13.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.46 | $0.57 | $0.51 | $5.66 | $5.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +11.2% | +48.9% | +55.1% | +62.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.4 | 42.5 | 56.2 | 54.6 | 65.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 742K | 736K | 36.3M | 1.0M | 14.5M |
Analyst Outlook
EXPI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RMAX as "Hold", OPEN as "Hold", EXPI as "Buy", COMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs 22.2% for OPEN (target: $7). For income investors, EXPI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.86% vs RMAX's 0.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.67 | — | $6.50 | $11.00 | $14.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | — | 26 | 5 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — | — | +2.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — | — | $0.19 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.2% | 0.0% |
RMAX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPAD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
RMAX vs OPAD vs OPEN vs EXPI vs COMP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RMAX or OPAD or OPEN or EXPI or COMP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -38. 2% for Offerpad Solutions Inc. (OPAD). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX) offers the better valuation at 27. 6x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate eXp World Holdings, Inc. (EXPI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RMAX or OPAD or OPEN or EXPI or COMP?
On forward P/E, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 8. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RMAX or OPAD or OPEN or EXPI or COMP?
Over the past 5 years, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) delivered a total return of -48. 3%, compared to -99. 5% for Offerpad Solutions Inc. (OPAD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPI returned +703. 2% versus OPAD's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RMAX or OPAD or OPEN or EXPI or COMP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.
(RMAX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus Offerpad Solutions Inc. 's 3. 65β — meaning OPAD is approximately 162% more volatile than RMAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 58% for Compass, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RMAX or OPAD or OPEN or EXPI or COMP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -38. 2% for Offerpad Solutions Inc. (OPAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Compass, Inc. grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COMP leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RMAX or OPAD or OPEN or EXPI or COMP?
RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.
(RMAX) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 8% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RMAX leads at 15. 6% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RMAX leads at 57. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RMAX or OPAD or OPEN or EXPI or COMP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.
(RMAX) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 96. 3x for eXp World Holdings, Inc. — 87. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 63. 3% to $14. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — RMAX or OPAD or OPEN or EXPI or COMP?
In this comparison, EXPI (2.
9% yield), RMAX (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. OPAD, OPEN, COMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RMAX or OPAD or OPEN or EXPI or COMP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eXp World Holdings, Inc.
(EXPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 9% yield, +703. 2% 10Y return). Offerpad Solutions Inc. (OPAD) carries a higher beta of 3. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPI: +703. 2%, OPAD: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RMAX and OPAD and OPEN and EXPI and COMP?
These companies operate in different sectors (RMAX (Real Estate) and OPAD (Real Estate) and OPEN (Real Estate) and EXPI (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RMAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPAD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock. EXPI pays a dividend while RMAX, OPAD, OPEN, COMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.