Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
RNA vs SRPT vs BMRN vs ALNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
RNA vs SRPT vs BMRN vs ALNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $218M | $1.66B | $10.70B | $38.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $2.18B | $3.24B | $4.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-396M | $65M | $269M | $577M |
| Gross Margin | -275.6% | 34.4% | 75.9% | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | -11.6% | -1.9% | 13.8% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.5x | 11.3x | 38.4x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $1.04B | $643M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $270M | $801M | $1.31B | $1.66B |
RNA vs SRPT vs BMRN vs ALNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atrium Therapeutics… (RNA) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
| Sarepta Therapeutic… (SRPT) | 100 | 9.8 | -90.2% |
| BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 194.3 | +94.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RNA vs SRPT vs BMRN vs ALNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RNA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 70.9% revenue growth vs BMRN's 12.9%
SRPT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.5x vs 38.4x)
BMRN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.53
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 10.6%, current ratio 5.21x
- Beta 0.53, current ratio 5.21x
- Beta 0.53 vs SRPT's 2.10, lower leverage
ALNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 386.6% 10Y total return vs BMRN's -33.8%
- 13.5% margin vs RNA's -10.8%
- 11.8% ROA vs RNA's -71.5%, ROIC 33.4% vs -10.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 70.9% revenue growth vs BMRN's 12.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.5x vs 38.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.5% margin vs RNA's -10.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs SRPT's 2.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.0% vs RNA's -57.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs RNA's -71.5%, ROIC 33.4% vs -10.0% |
RNA vs SRPT vs BMRN vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RNA vs SRPT vs BMRN vs ALNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALNY leads in 3 of 6 categories
BMRN leads 1 • RNA leads 0 • SRPT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 116.4x RNA's $37M. ALNY is the more profitable business, keeping 13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RNA's -10.8%. On growth, RNA holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $2.2B | $3.2B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$423M | -$6M | $521M | $677M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$396M | $65M | $269M | $577M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$416M | $107M | $767M | $641M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +34.4% | +75.9% | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | -1.9% | +13.8% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.8% | +3.0% | +8.3% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.3% | +4.9% | +23.7% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | -1.9% | +2.8% | +96.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.8% | +162.6% | -43.2% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RNA and SRPT and BMRN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, BMRN trades at a 75% valuation discount to ALNY's 123.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BMRN's 16.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 68.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $218M | $1.7B | $10.7B | $38.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$48M | $1.9B | $10.0B | $38.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.85x | -2.21x | 30.92x | 123.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.47x | 11.27x | 38.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 16.37x | 68.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.71x | 0.76x | 3.32x | 10.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.45x | 1.80x | 49.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.76x | 82.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-86 for RNA. RNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs SRPT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -85.9% | +4.9% | +4.4% | +98.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -71.5% | +1.9% | +3.4% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.0% | -31.4% | +7.4% | +33.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.0% | -24.0% | +8.1% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.91x | 0.11x | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$266M | $238M | -$669M | -$379M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $270M | $801M | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $1.0B | $643M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.00x | 16.96x | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALNY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALNY five years ago would be worth $17,285 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,897 for SRPT. Over the past 12 months, BMRN leads with a -1.0% total return vs RNA's -57.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALNY at 12.5% vs SRPT's -50.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -82.3% | -26.0% | -6.4% | -28.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.2% | -24.7% | -1.0% | -6.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.2% | -88.0% | -41.9% | +42.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.5% | -81.0% | -32.1% | +72.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.3% | -16.4% | -33.8% | +386.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.7% | -50.7% | -16.6% | +12.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BMRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BMRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SRPT's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BMRN currently trades 84.0% from its 52-week high vs RNA's 17.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 2.10x | 0.53x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $73.06 | $25.32 | $66.28 | $495.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.40 | $10.42 | $49.26 | $281.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +17.5% | +62.3% | +84.0% | +58.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 34.7 | 53.9 | 40.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 245K | 2.6M | 1.9M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RNA as "Hold", SRPT as "Buy", BMRN as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 96.1% upside for RNA (target: $25) vs 54.9% for ALNY (target: $446).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $25.14 | $89.93 | $445.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 54 | 41 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALNY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BMRN leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
RNA vs SRPT vs BMRN vs ALNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RNA or SRPT or BMRN or ALNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Atrium Therapeutics, Inc.
(RNA) is the stronger pick with 70. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 9% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN). BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RNA or SRPT or BMRN or ALNY?
On trailing P/E, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
(BMRN) is the cheapest at 30. 9x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 123. 5x. On forward P/E, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RNA or SRPT or BMRN or ALNY?
Over the past 5 years, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) delivered a total return of +72. 9%, compared to -81. 0% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALNY returned +386. 6% versus RNA's -55. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RNA or SRPT or BMRN or ALNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
(BMRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning SRPT is approximately 297% more volatile than BMRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Atrium Therapeutics, Inc. (RNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RNA or SRPT or BMRN or ALNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atrium Therapeutics, Inc.
(RNA) is pulling ahead at 70. 9% versus 12. 9% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -404. 7% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RNA or SRPT or BMRN or ALNY?
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
(BMRN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -411. 9% for Atrium Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMRN leads at 16. 6% versus -412. 6% for RNA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RNA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RNA or SRPT or BMRN or ALNY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
(SRPT) trades at 4. 5x forward P/E versus 38. 4x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 33. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RNA: 96. 1% to $25. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RNA or SRPT or BMRN or ALNY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is RNA or SRPT or BMRN or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), +386. 6% 10Y return). Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALNY: +386. 6%, SRPT: -16. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RNA and SRPT and BMRN and ALNY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RNA is a small-cap high-growth stock; SRPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BMRN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.