Medical - Pharmaceuticals
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RNTX vs INSM vs ALNY vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
RNTX vs INSM vs ALNY vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Pharmaceuticals | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $21K | $22.62B | $39.48B | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $606M | $4.29B | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-59M | $-1.28B | $577M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | — | 79.4% | 80.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -194.0% | 17.5% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 44.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $768M | $1.28B | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $510M | $1.66B | $357M |
RNTX vs INSM vs ALNY vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rein Therapeutics I… (RNTX) | 100 | 50.9 | -49.1% |
| Insmed Incorporated (INSM) | 100 | 151.8 | +51.8% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 125.8 | +25.8% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 433.1 | +333.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RNTX vs INSM vs ALNY vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RNTX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
INSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.54
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 411.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.54, current ratio 3.83x
ALNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 13.5% margin vs INSM's -210.5%
- 11.8% ROA vs RNTX's -109.6%, ROIC 33.4% vs -313.6%
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.7% vs RNTX's -28.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.5% margin vs INSM's -210.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs RNTX's -28.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs RNTX's -109.6%, ROIC 33.4% vs -313.6% |
RNTX vs INSM vs ALNY vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RNTX vs INSM vs ALNY vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALNY leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • RNTX leads 0 • INSM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. ALNY is the more profitable business, keeping 13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INSM's -2.1%. On growth, INSM holds the edge at +152.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $606M | $4.3B | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$61M | -$1.2B | $677M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$59M | -$1.3B | $577M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$21M | -$998M | $641M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +79.4% | +80.9% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -194.0% | +17.5% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.1% | +13.5% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -164.5% | +15.0% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +152.6% | +96.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.2% | -16.7% | +4.4% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RNTX and ALNY and PRAX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20,987 | $22.6B | $39.5B | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$13M | $22.9B | $39.1B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.33x | -16.35x | 127.00x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 44.18x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 70.17x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 37.30x | 10.63x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 30.30x | 50.50x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 84.84x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-168 for INSM. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs RNTX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -127.5% | -168.4% | +98.3% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -109.6% | -57.3% | +11.8% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | -86.5% | +33.4% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -78.9% | -66.8% | +15.3% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.04x | 1.62x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | $258M | -$379M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $510M | $1.7B | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $768M | $1.3B | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.23x | 2.02x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSM five years ago would be worth $32,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,519 for RNTX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs RNTX's -28.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs RNTX's -18.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.4% | -40.8% | -26.1% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.2% | +53.5% | +7.0% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.8% | +454.5% | +40.9% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.8% | +221.7% | +125.4% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.8% | +793.5% | +411.9% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.0% | +77.0% | +12.1% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSM and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs RNTX's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 0.54x | 0.71x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.40 | $212.75 | $495.55 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $63.81 | $245.96 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.8% | +49.3% | +59.7% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.0 | 41.9 | 43.8 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 541K | 2.3M | 1.1M | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INSM as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.2% upside for INSM (target: $217) vs 50.6% for ALNY (target: $446).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $217.11 | $445.67 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 35 | 52 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALNY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
RNTX vs INSM vs ALNY vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RNTX or INSM or ALNY or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger pick with 66.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ALNY) offers the better valuation at 127. 0x trailing P/E (44. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insmed Incorporated (INSM) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RNTX or INSM or ALNY or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) delivered a total return of +221.
7%, compared to -44. 8% for Rein Therapeutics Inc. (RNTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSM returned +793. 5% versus RNTX's -44. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RNTX or INSM or ALNY or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 186% more volatile than INSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RNTX or INSM or ALNY or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is pulling ahead at 66.
7% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RNTX or INSM or ALNY or PRAX?
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -210. 5% for Insmed Incorporated — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALNY leads at 13. 5% versus -194. 0% for INSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALNY leads at 81. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RNTX or INSM or ALNY or PRAX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSM: 107.
2% to $217. 11.
07Which pays a better dividend — RNTX or INSM or ALNY or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is RNTX or INSM or ALNY or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), +793. 5% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSM: +793. 5%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RNTX and INSM and ALNY and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RNTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.