Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RYDE vs GOOGL vs AAPL vs META vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Consumer Electronics
Internet Content & Information
Software - Infrastructure
RYDE vs GOOGL vs AAPL vs META vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information | Consumer Electronics | Internet Content & Information | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $24M | $4.81T | $4.22T | $1.56T | $3.13T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14M | $422.57B | $451.44B | $214.96B | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $160.21B | $122.58B | $70.59B | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | -38.0% | 60.4% | 47.9% | 81.9% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | -82.2% | 32.7% | 32.6% | 41.2% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.6x | 33.7x | 20.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $135K | $59.29B | $112.38B | $83.90B | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $30.71B | $35.93B | $35.87B | $30.24B |
RYDE vs GOOGL vs AAPL vs META vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryde Group Ltd. (RYDE) | 100 | 27.8 | -72.2% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 265.5 | +165.5% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 171.0 | +71.0% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 125.5 | +25.5% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 98.7 | -1.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RYDE vs GOOGL vs AAPL vs META vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RYDE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +404.1% vs MSFT's -2.1%
GOOGL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- PEG 0.99 vs AAPL's 1.89
AAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs GOOGL's 10.0%
- 34.0% ROA vs RYDE's -255.5%
META is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 22.2% revenue growth vs RYDE's 3.3%
- Lower P/E (20.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.11 vs 1.35
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs RYDE's -136.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.2% revenue growth vs RYDE's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.11 vs 1.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs RYDE's -136.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs META's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +404.1% vs MSFT's -2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs RYDE's -255.5% |
RYDE vs GOOGL vs AAPL vs META vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RYDE vs GOOGL vs AAPL vs META vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories
META leads 1 • AAPL leads 1 • GOOGL leads 1 • RYDE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 33218.2x RYDE's $14M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RYDE's -136.6%. On growth, RYDE holds the edge at +162.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14M | $422.6B | $451.4B | $215.0B | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $161.3B | $160.0B | $109.3B | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $160.2B | $122.6B | $70.6B | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $73.3B | $129.2B | $48.3B | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -38.0% | +60.4% | +47.9% | +81.9% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -82.2% | +32.7% | +32.6% | +41.2% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -136.6% | +37.9% | +27.2% | +32.8% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -89.2% | +17.3% | +28.6% | +22.4% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +162.7% | +21.8% | +16.6% | +33.1% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.2% | +81.9% | +21.8% | +62.4% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
META leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.3x trailing earnings, META trades at a 32% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.23x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $4.81T | $4.22T | $1.56T | $3.13T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $4.84T | $4.30T | $1.61T | $3.21T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.60x | 36.82x | 38.53x | 26.26x | 30.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.61x | 33.71x | 20.36x | 25.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.23x | 2.16x | 1.43x | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 32.22x | 29.68x | 15.81x | 19.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.34x | 11.95x | 10.14x | 7.78x | 11.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.73x | 11.72x | 58.49x | 7.31x | 9.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 65.72x | 42.72x | 33.90x | 43.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-8 for RYDE. RYDE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs META's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.2% | +39.0% | +146.7% | +33.2% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +27.4% | +34.0% | +20.8% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +25.1% | +67.4% | +27.6% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | +30.3% | +69.6% | +29.4% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.14x | 1.52x | 0.39x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $28.6B | $76.4B | $48.0B | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $30.7B | $35.9B | $35.9B | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $135,000 | $59.3B | $112.4B | $83.9B | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -43.54x | 392.15x | — | 78.84x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,775 for RYDE. Over the past 12 months, RYDE leads with a +404.1% total return vs MSFT's -2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs RYDE's -34.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +330.2% | +26.4% | +6.2% | -5.1% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +404.1% | +163.5% | +47.0% | +3.7% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | +270.8% | +67.4% | +166.4% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.2% | +239.8% | +124.4% | +94.8% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | +996.1% | +1174.1% | +421.2% | +787.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.8% | +54.8% | +18.7% | +38.6% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOOGL and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than META's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs RYDE's 71.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.41x | 1.28x | 1.04x | 1.55x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.55 | $400.10 | $292.13 | $796.25 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.16 | $147.84 | $193.25 | $520.26 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.6% | +99.5% | +98.4% | +77.5% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 83.4 | 69.4 | 42.8 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 28.3M | 39.8M | 15.6M | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOOGL as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy", META as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.2% upside for META (target: $822) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $406.28 | $319.44 | $821.80 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 82 | 110 | 60 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +0.4% | +0.3% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 14 | 2 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 | $1.03 | $2.07 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +2.1% | +1.7% | +0.6% |
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). META leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RYDE vs GOOGL vs AAPL vs META vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RYDE or GOOGL or AAPL or META or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the stronger pick with 22. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for Ryde Group Ltd. (RYDE). Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) offers the better valuation at 26. 3x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) a "Buy" — based on 82 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RYDE or GOOGL or AAPL or META or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the cheapest at 26. 3x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RYDE or GOOGL or AAPL or META or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -72. 2% for Ryde Group Ltd. (RYDE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1199% versus RYDE's -74. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RYDE or GOOGL or AAPL or META or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
85β versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning META is approximately 81% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ryde Group Ltd. (RYDE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RYDE or GOOGL or AAPL or META or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is pulling ahead at 22. 2% versus 3. 3% for Ryde Group Ltd. (RYDE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -31. 3% for Ryde Group Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, META leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RYDE or GOOGL or AAPL or META or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -208. 4% for Ryde Group Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -207. 8% for RYDE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RYDE or GOOGL or AAPL or META or MSFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 33. 7x for Apple Inc. — 13. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for META: 33. 2% to $821. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — RYDE or GOOGL or AAPL or META or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield), META (0. 3% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. RYDE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RYDE or GOOGL or AAPL or META or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
85), 0. 8% yield, +776. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +776. 0%, RYDE: -74. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RYDE and GOOGL and AAPL and META and MSFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (RYDE (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and AAPL (Technology) and META (Communication Services) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RYDE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while RYDE, GOOGL, AAPL, META do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.