Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SACH vs LOAN vs GPMT vs TPVG vs TRTX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateAMEX • US
Market Cap$53M
5Y Perf.-61.9%
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$48M
5Y Perf.-4.7%
GPMT
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$74M
5Y Perf.-68.5%
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$243M
5Y Perf.-40.2%
TRTX
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$656M
5Y Perf.+14.6%

SACH vs LOAN vs GPMT vs TPVG vs TRTX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SACH logoSACH
LOAN logoLOAN
GPMT logoGPMT
TPVG logoTPVG
TRTX logoTRTX
IndustryREIT - MortgageREIT - MortgageREIT - MortgageAsset ManagementREIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$53M$48M$74M$243M$656M
Revenue (TTM)$38M$8M$132M$97M$264M
Net Income (TTM)$6M$5M$-40M$-12M$61M
Gross Margin98.1%99.9%47.3%83.5%78.5%
Operating Margin42.0%58.1%-4.3%77.9%51.0%
Forward P/E28.1x8.6x6.5x8.1x
Total Debt$278M$23M$1.17B$469M$3.29B
Cash & Equiv.$11M$178K$66M$20M$88M

SACH vs LOAN vs GPMT vs TPVG vs TRTXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SACH
LOAN
GPMT
TPVG
TRTX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH)10038.1-61.9%
Manhattan Bridge Ca… (LOAN)10095.3-4.7%
Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT)10031.5-68.5%
TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG)10059.8-40.2%
TPG RE Finance Trus… (TRTX)100114.6+14.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SACH vs LOAN vs GPMT vs TPVG vs TRTX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LOAN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Sachem Capital Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. GPMT and TPVG also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
The Real Estate Income Play

SACH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.44, yield 18.4%
  • Beta 0.44, yield 18.4%, current ratio 0.84x
  • 18.4% yield, vs TRTX's 13.5%
  • +34.0% vs GPMT's -19.7%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

LOAN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 102.8% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 93.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 52.1%, current ratio 31.09x
  • 70.0% margin vs GPMT's -30.5%
  • Beta 0.12 vs GPMT's 1.44, lower leverage
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
GPMT
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

GPMT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 187.8%, EPS growth 73.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.9%
  • 187.8% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2%
Best for: growth exposure
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick

TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
TRTX
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
The REIT Holding

Among these 5 stocks, TRTX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: real estate exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGPMT logoGPMT187.8% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2%
ValueTPVG logoTPVGBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLOAN logoLOAN70.0% margin vs GPMT's -30.5%
Stability / SafetyLOAN logoLOANBeta 0.12 vs GPMT's 1.44, lower leverage
DividendsSACH logoSACH18.4% yield, vs TRTX's 13.5%
Momentum (1Y)SACH logoSACH+34.0% vs GPMT's -19.7%
Efficiency (ROA)LOAN logoLOAN8.1% ROA vs GPMT's -2.3%, ROIC 8.5% vs 2.6%

SACH vs LOAN vs GPMT vs TPVG vs TRTX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLOANLAGGINGTRTX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LOAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

TRTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $264M annually — 35.0x LOAN's $8M. LOAN is the more profitable business, keeping 70.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPMT's -30.5%. On growth, GPMT holds the edge at +157.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…LOAN logoLOANManhattan Bridge …GPMT logoGPMTGranite Point Mor…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…TRTX logoTRTXTPG RE Finance Tr…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$38M$8M$132M$97M$264M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$17M$4M-$8M-$22M$144M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$6M$5M-$40M-$12M$61M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3M$5M$463,000$35M$96M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+98.1%+99.9%+47.3%+83.5%+78.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+42.0%+58.1%-4.3%+77.9%+51.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.7%+70.0%-30.5%+50.6%+23.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.6%+62.6%+0.4%-58.7%+36.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+145.2%+14.6%+157.8%-4.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-79.9%-8.3%+40.9%-2.3%+58.3%
LOAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GPMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 83% valuation discount to SACH's 28.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LOAN's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPMT's 20.8x.

MetricSACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…LOAN logoLOANManhattan Bridge …GPMT logoGPMTGranite Point Mor…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…TRTX logoTRTXTPG RE Finance Tr…
Market CapShares × price$53M$48M$74M$243M$656M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$320M$71M$1.2B$691M$3.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS28.06x8.63x-1.34x4.91x14.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.50x8.09x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.84x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.33x8.94x20.75x9.13x15.10x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.12x4.99x0.51x2.50x1.97x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.29x1.12x0.13x0.68x0.63x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.11x9.82x27.85x7.26x
GPMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LOAN leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

LOAN delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-7 for GPMT. LOAN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRTX's 3.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOAN scores 7/9 vs TPVG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…LOAN logoLOANManhattan Bridge …GPMT logoGPMTGranite Point Mor…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…TRTX logoTRTXTPG RE Finance Tr…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.6%+12.2%-7.1%-3.4%+5.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.3%+8.1%-2.3%-1.5%+1.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.8%+8.5%+2.6%+7.2%+4.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.2%+11.3%+4.6%+9.4%+7.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967656
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.59x0.52x2.12x1.33x3.08x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$267M$22M$1.1B$449M$3.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11M$178,012$66M$20M$88M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$278M$23M$1.2B$469M$3.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.25x3.38x0.58x-1.02x1.32x
LOAN leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — SACH and LOAN and TRTX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LOAN five years ago would be worth $10,257 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,472 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, SACH leads with a +34.0% total return vs GPMT's -19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRTX at 26.7% vs SACH's -16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…LOAN logoLOANManhattan Bridge …GPMT logoGPMTGranite Point Mor…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…TRTX logoTRTXTPG RE Finance Tr…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.6%-6.3%-32.5%-6.3%-1.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+34.0%-8.5%-19.7%+19.3%+25.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-42.4%+16.4%-34.3%-3.4%+103.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-43.2%+2.6%-65.3%-13.5%+1.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-5.2%+102.8%-50.0%+93.3%-1.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-16.8%+5.2%-13.1%-1.2%+26.7%
Evenly matched — SACH and LOAN and TRTX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LOAN and TRTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LOAN is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRTX currently trades 86.2% from its 52-week high vs GPMT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…LOAN logoLOANManhattan Bridge …GPMT logoGPMTGranite Point Mor…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…TRTX logoTRTXTPG RE Finance Tr…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.44x0.12x1.44x0.83x0.78x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.35$5.85$3.12$7.53$9.85
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.80$4.13$1.24$4.48$7.44
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.5%+72.3%+49.7%+79.5%+86.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.836.649.458.360.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded157K28K154K504K655K
Evenly matched — LOAN and TRTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SACH and TRTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: GPMT as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold", TRTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for GPMT (target: $3) vs 17.8% for TRTX (target: $10). For income investors, SACH offers the higher dividend yield at 18.42% vs LOAN's 10.82%.

MetricSACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…LOAN logoLOANManhattan Bridge …GPMT logoGPMTGranite Point Mor…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…TRTX logoTRTXTPG RE Finance Tr…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.50$8.95$10.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts121211
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+18.4%+10.8%+14.0%+17.1%+13.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00002
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.20$0.46$0.22$1.02$1.15
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%+7.6%0.0%+3.9%
Evenly matched — SACH and TRTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LOAN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GPMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallManhattan Bridge Capital, I… (LOAN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SACH vs LOAN vs GPMT vs TPVG vs TRTX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SACH or LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or TRTX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.

(GPMT) is the stronger pick with 187. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SACH or LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or TRTX?

On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Sachem Capital Corp. at 28. 1x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SACH or LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or TRTX?

Over the past 5 years, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

(LOAN) delivered a total return of +2. 6%, compared to -65. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOAN returned +102. 8% versus GPMT's -50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SACH or LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or TRTX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

(LOAN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning GPMT is approximately 1117% more volatile than LOAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 3% for TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SACH or LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or TRTX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.

(GPMT) is pulling ahead at 187. 8% versus -18. 2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sachem Capital Corp. grew EPS 104. 2% year-over-year, compared to -26. 0% for TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPMT leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SACH or LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or TRTX?

Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

(LOAN) is the more profitable company, earning 57. 7% net margin versus -28. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 57. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOAN leads at 81. 6% versus 43. 6% for GPMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SACH leads at 97. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SACH or LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or TRTX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 8. 1x for TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPMT: 61. 3% to $2. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SACH or LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or TRTX?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) offers the highest yield at 18. 4%, versus 10. 8% for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN).

09

Is SACH or LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or TRTX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

(LOAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 10. 8% yield, +102. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOAN: +102. 8%, GPMT: -50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SACH and LOAN and GPMT and TPVG and TRTX?

These companies operate in different sectors (SACH (Real Estate) and LOAN (Real Estate) and GPMT (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services) and TRTX (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SACH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LOAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; GPMT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRTX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SACH

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 72%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LOAN

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GPMT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 78%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TPVG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TRTX

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.4%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SACH and LOAN and GPMT and TPVG and TRTX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SACH: 145.2% · LOAN: 14.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(SACH: 16.7% · LOAN: 70.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SACH: 28.1x · LOAN: 8.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.