SCCD
Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Notes Due 2026
REIT - Industrial
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.-1.5%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SCCD vs SACH vs LOAN vs RC vs GPMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
REIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$53M
5Y Perf.-81.2%
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
REIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$48M
5Y Perf.-23.1%
RC
Ready Capital Corporation
REIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$357M
5Y Perf.-86.2%
GPMT
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
REIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$74M
5Y Perf.-86.8%
SCCD vs SACH vs LOAN vs RC vs GPMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SCCD | SACH | LOAN | RC | GPMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.18B | $53M | $48M | $357M | $74M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-13M | $38M | $8M | $499M | $132M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $6M | $5M | $-229M | $-40M |
| Gross Margin | — | 98.1% | 99.9% | -0.0% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.0% | 58.1% | -50.5% | -4.3% |
| Forward P/E | 619.3x | 28.1x | 8.6x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $278M | $23M | $5.86B | $1.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $11M | $178K | $248M | $66M |
SCCD vs SACH vs LOAN vs RC vs GPMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SCCD
SACH
LOAN
RC
GPMT
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCD) | 100 | 98.5 | -1.5% |
| Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) | 100 | 18.8 | -81.2% |
| Manhattan Bridge Ca… (LOAN) | 100 | 76.9 | -23.1% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 13.8 | -86.2% |
| Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT) | 100 | 13.2 | -86.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCCD vs SACH vs LOAN vs RC vs GPMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LOAN leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Ready Capital Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. SACH also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SCCD
Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Notes Due 2026
The REIT Holding
SCCD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: real estate exposure
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
The Real Estate Income Play
SACH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.44, yield 18.4%
- +34.0% vs RC's -44.9%
Best for: income & stability
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
LOAN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 102.8% 10Y total return vs SCCD's 33.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 52.1%, current ratio 31.09x
- Beta 0.12, yield 10.8%, current ratio 31.09x
- Better valuation composite
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
RC
Ready Capital Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play
RC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and dividends is your priority.
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2%
- 31.4% yield, vs LOAN's 10.8%
Best for: growth and dividends
GPMT
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
GPMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 187.8%, EPS growth 73.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.9%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RC | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2% |
| Value | LOAN | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | LOAN | 70.0% margin vs RC's -45.8% |
| Stability / Safety | LOAN | Beta 0.12 vs GPMT's 1.44, lower leverage |
| Dividends | RC | 31.4% yield, vs LOAN's 10.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SACH | +34.0% vs RC's -44.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LOAN | 8.1% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 8.5% vs 1.2% |
SCCD vs SACH vs LOAN vs RC vs GPMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLLOANLAGGINGGPMT
Who Leads Where
LOAN leads in 2 of 6 categories
SCCD leads 1 • RC leads 1 • SACH leads 0 • GPMT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓GPMTGranite Point Mortgag…
0leads
SACHSachem Capital Corp.
0leads
RCReady Capital Corpora…
1leads
SCCDSachem Capital Corp. …
1leads
LOANManhattan Bridge Capi…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SCCDvs RCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LOAN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LOAN7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SCCD3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
RC1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RC and SCCD operate at a comparable scale, with $499M and -$13M in trailing revenue. LOAN is the more profitable business, keeping 70.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SCCDSachem Capital Co… | SACHSachem Capital Co… | LOANManhattan Bridge … | RCReady Capital Cor… | GPMTGranite Point Mor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$13M | $38M | $8M | $499M | $132M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $551,999 | $17M | $4M | -$249M | -$8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $6M | $5M | -$229M | -$40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $3M | $5M | $303M | $463,000 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +98.1% | +99.9% | -0.0% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +42.0% | +58.1% | -50.5% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +16.7% | +70.0% | -45.8% | -30.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +6.6% | +62.6% | +60.6% | +0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +145.2% | +14.6% | +8.7% | +157.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -79.3% | -79.9% | -8.3% | +24.9% | +40.9% |
LOAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LOAN and GPMT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.6x trailing earnings, LOAN trades at a 99% valuation discount to SCCD's 619.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LOAN's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RC's 48.3x.
| Metric | SCCDSachem Capital Co… | SACHSachem Capital Co… | LOANManhattan Bridge … | RCReady Capital Cor… | GPMTGranite Point Mor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $53M | $48M | $357M | $74M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $320M | $71M | $6.0B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 619.25x | 28.06x | 8.63x | -1.50x | -1.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.33x | 8.94x | 48.25x | 20.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.12x | 4.99x | 0.71x | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.64x | 0.29x | 1.12x | 0.22x | 0.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 472.46x | 21.11x | 9.82x | — | 27.85x |
Evenly matched — LOAN and GPMT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOAN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOAN delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. LOAN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RC's 3.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOAN scores 7/9 vs RC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SCCDSachem Capital Co… | SACHSachem Capital Co… | LOANManhattan Bridge … | RCReady Capital Cor… | GPMTGranite Point Mor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | +3.6% | +12.2% | -12.2% | -7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.3% | +8.1% | -2.6% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +4.8% | +8.5% | +1.2% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +6.2% | +11.3% | +1.4% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.59x | 0.52x | 3.55x | 2.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | $267M | $22M | $5.6B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $11M | $178,012 | $248M | $66M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $278M | $23M | $5.9B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.25x | 3.38x | 0.41x | 0.58x |
LOAN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SCCD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCCD five years ago would be worth $13,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,472 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, SACH leads with a +34.0% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCCD at 14.3% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SCCDSachem Capital Co… | SACHSachem Capital Co… | LOANManhattan Bridge … | RCReady Capital Cor… | GPMTGranite Point Mor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.1% | +10.6% | -6.3% | +1.4% | -32.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.0% | +34.0% | -8.5% | -44.9% | -19.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.4% | -42.4% | +16.4% | -54.4% | -34.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.0% | -43.2% | +2.6% | -44.4% | -65.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.0% | -5.2% | +102.8% | +6.1% | -50.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | -16.8% | +5.2% | -23.1% | -13.1% |
SCCD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SCCD and LOAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOAN is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCCD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SCCDSachem Capital Co… | SACHSachem Capital Co… | LOANManhattan Bridge … | RCReady Capital Cor… | GPMTGranite Point Mor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 0.44x | 0.12x | 1.17x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.80 | $1.35 | $5.85 | $4.75 | $3.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.97 | $0.80 | $4.13 | $1.51 | $1.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +81.5% | +72.3% | +45.5% | +49.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 58.8 | 36.6 | 64.1 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 157K | 28K | 2.1M | 154K |
Evenly matched — SCCD and LOAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
RC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RC as "Buy", GPMT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for GPMT (target: $3) vs 15.7% for RC (target: $3). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs SCCD's 0.82%.
| Metric | SCCDSachem Capital Co… | SACHSachem Capital Co… | LOANManhattan Bridge … | RCReady Capital Cor… | GPMTGranite Point Mor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $2.50 | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 16 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +18.4% | +10.8% | +31.4% | +14.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $0.20 | $0.46 | $0.68 | $0.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +18.9% | +7.6% |
RC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
LOAN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SCCD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallManhattan Bridge Capital, I… (LOAN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SCCD vs SACH vs LOAN vs RC vs GPMT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCCD or SACH or LOAN or RC or GPMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18.
2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ready Capital Corporation (RC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCCD or SACH or LOAN or RC or GPMT?
On trailing P/E, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
(LOAN) is the cheapest at 8. 6x versus Sachem Capital Corp. 6. 00% Notes Due 2026 at 619. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCCD or SACH or LOAN or RC or GPMT?
Over the past 5 years, Sachem Capital Corp.
6. 00% Notes Due 2026 (SCCD) delivered a total return of +33. 0%, compared to -65. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOAN returned +102. 8% versus GPMT's -50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCCD or SACH or LOAN or RC or GPMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
(LOAN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning GPMT is approximately 1117% more volatile than LOAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 4% for Ready Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SCCD or SACH or LOAN or RC or GPMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -18.
2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sachem Capital Corp. 6. 00% Notes Due 2026 grew EPS 104. 3% year-over-year, compared to 2. 1% for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPMT leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCCD or SACH or LOAN or RC or GPMT?
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
(LOAN) is the more profitable company, earning 57. 7% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 57. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOAN leads at 81. 6% versus 0. 0% for SCCD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SACH leads at 97. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — SCCD or SACH or LOAN or RC or GPMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 31. 4%, versus 0. 8% for Sachem Capital Corp. 6. 00% Notes Due 2026 (SCCD).
08Is SCCD or SACH or LOAN or RC or GPMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
(LOAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 10. 8% yield, +102. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOAN: +102. 8%, GPMT: -50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SCCD and SACH and LOAN and RC and GPMT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SCCD is a small-cap high-growth stock; SACH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LOAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; RC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GPMT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SCCD: -256.5% · SACH: 145.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(SCCD: 619.3x · SACH: 28.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.