Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SCWO vs CWCO vs MSEX vs PESI vs YORW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
Waste Management
Regulated Water
SCWO vs CWCO vs MSEX vs PESI vs YORW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Waste Management | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $342M | $529M | $955M | $207M | $421M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $132M | $199M | $59M | $-18M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $18M | $44M | $-18M | $21M |
| Gross Margin | -29.8% | 36.6% | 33.3% | 4.1% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -9.2% | 139015.1% | 28.1% | -26.3% | 35.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 31.6x | 20.1x | — | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $653K | $708.60B | $419M | $4M | $232M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $123.79T | $3M | $12M | $1K |
SCWO vs CWCO vs MSEX vs PESI vs YORW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 374Water, Inc. (SCWO) | 100 | 925.0 | +825.0% |
| Consolidated Water … (CWCO) | 100 | 223.7 | +123.7% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 75.8 | -24.2% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
| The York Water Comp… (YORW) | 100 | 65.7 | -34.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCWO vs CWCO vs MSEX vs PESI vs YORW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SCWO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 16.1% 10Y total return vs CWCO's 155.1%
- +6.3% vs MSEX's -12.8%
CWCO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 6.12x
- Beta 0.76, yield 100.0%, current ratio 6.12x
- 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs YORW's 3.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
MSEX is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 3.2% ROA vs SCWO's -153.2%, ROIC 4.7% vs -196.4%
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth 43.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.4%
- 4.3% revenue growth vs SCWO's -40.1%
YORW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.08, yield 3.0%
- PEG 9.89 vs MSEX's 12.58
- Better valuation composite
- 25.9% margin vs SCWO's -9.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% revenue growth vs SCWO's -40.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs SCWO's -9.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs SCWO's 2.58 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs YORW's 3.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.3% vs MSEX's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs SCWO's -153.2%, ROIC 4.7% vs -196.4% |
SCWO vs CWCO vs MSEX vs PESI vs YORW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SCWO vs CWCO vs MSEX vs PESI vs YORW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CWCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
YORW leads 1 • SCWO leads 0 • MSEX leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YORW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSEX and YORW operate at a comparable scale, with $199M and -$18M in trailing revenue. YORW is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SCWO's -9.1%. On growth, SCWO holds the edge at +8.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $132M | $199M | $59M | -$18M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | $25.98T | $81M | -$14M | $42M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $18M | $44M | -$18M | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $33.67T | -$19M | -$14M | -$30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -29.8% | +36.6% | +33.3% | +4.1% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.2% | +139015.1% | +28.1% | -26.3% | +35.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.1% | +13.9% | +22.1% | -30.1% | +25.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +254916.5% | -9.7% | -23.4% | -24.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +4.4% | +10.0% | -20.1% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -47.8% | -11.5% | -100.0% | -110.5% | +32.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CWCO and YORW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.0x trailing earnings, YORW trades at a 4% valuation discount to MSEX's 21.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), YORW offers better value at 11.52x vs MSEX's 13.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $342M | $529M | $955M | $207M | $421M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $332M | -$123.08T | $1.4B | $200M | $653M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -24.00x | — | 21.78x | -14.89x | 20.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.60x | 20.12x | — | 18.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 13.62x | — | 11.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -4.74x | 15.79x | — | 15.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 768.80x | 4.01x | 4.91x | 3.36x | 5.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.29x | 0.00x | 1.89x | 4.11x | 1.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.00x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CWCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSEX delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SCWO. CWCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to YORW's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CWCO scores 5/9 vs SCWO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | 0.0% | +9.1% | -34.5% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -153.2% | 0.0% | +3.2% | -20.2% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -196.4% | +26.6% | +4.7% | -21.7% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -83.1% | +16.0% | +4.4% | -16.7% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.00x | 0.85x | 0.09x | 0.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$123.08T | $416M | -$7M | $232M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $123.79T | $3M | $12M | $1,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $652,696 | $708.6B | $419M | $4M | $232M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 4.33x | -42.14x | 1.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWCO five years ago would be worth $29,742 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,799 for YORW. Over the past 12 months, SCWO leads with a +632.9% total return vs MSEX's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWCO at 26.3% vs YORW's -9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.5% | -3.9% | +3.0% | -8.8% | -7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +632.9% | +47.9% | -12.8% | +26.2% | -9.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.1% | +101.4% | -25.2% | +21.7% | -25.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +196.0% | +197.4% | -28.4% | +45.6% | -32.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1607.7% | +155.1% | +62.9% | +178.6% | +25.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.0% | +26.3% | -9.2% | +6.8% | -9.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CWCO and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSEX is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCWO's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWCO currently trades 84.8% from its 52-week high vs SCWO's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.58x | 0.76x | -0.12x | 1.85x | 0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.60 | $39.12 | $62.18 | $16.50 | $35.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.16 | $22.69 | $44.17 | $8.02 | $28.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.7% | +84.8% | +82.7% | +67.7% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 47.9 | 44.1 | 41.5 | 34.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 53K | 163K | 160K | 164K | 174K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CWCO and YORW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CWCO as "Buy", MSEX as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", YORW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 4.1% for MSEX (target: $54). For income investors, CWCO offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MSEX's 2.67%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $53.50 | $18.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% | +2.7% | — | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 21 | 1 | 31 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $497756.41 | $1.37 | — | $0.88 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CWCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). YORW leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
SCWO vs CWCO vs MSEX vs PESI vs YORW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCWO or CWCO or MSEX or PESI or YORW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -40. 1% for 374Water, Inc. (SCWO). The York Water Company (YORW) offers the better valuation at 21. 0x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCWO or CWCO or MSEX or PESI or YORW?
On trailing P/E, The York Water Company (YORW) is the cheapest at 21.
0x versus Middlesex Water Company at 21. 8x. On forward P/E, The York Water Company is actually cheaper at 18. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The York Water Company wins at 9. 89x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCWO or CWCO or MSEX or PESI or YORW?
Over the past 5 years, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) delivered a total return of +197. 4%, compared to -32. 0% for The York Water Company (YORW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCWO returned +1608% versus YORW's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCWO or CWCO or MSEX or PESI or YORW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
12β versus 374Water, Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning SCWO is approximately -2179% more volatile than MSEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 97% for The York Water Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SCWO or CWCO or MSEX or PESI or YORW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus -40. 1% for 374Water, Inc. (SCWO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SCWO leads at 110. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCWO or CWCO or MSEX or PESI or YORW?
The York Water Company (YORW) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
9% net margin versus -27. 9% for 374Water, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus -28. 7% for SCWO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YORW leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCWO or CWCO or MSEX or PESI or YORW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The York Water Company (YORW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 9. 89x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The York Water Company (YORW) trades at 18. 0x forward P/E versus 31. 6x for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCWO or CWCO or MSEX or PESI or YORW?
In this comparison, CWCO (100.
0% yield), YORW (3. 0% yield), MSEX (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SCWO, PESI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SCWO or CWCO or MSEX or PESI or YORW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
12), 2. 7% yield). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSEX: +62. 9%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCWO and CWCO and MSEX and PESI and YORW?
These companies operate in different sectors (SCWO (Industrials) and CWCO (Utilities) and MSEX (Utilities) and PESI (Industrials) and YORW (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SCWO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; YORW is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CWCO, MSEX, YORW pay a dividend while SCWO, PESI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.