Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SCWO vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs AWK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
SCWO vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs AWK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $342M | $421M | $955M | $326M | $24.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $-18M | $199M | $113M | $5.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $21M | $44M | $23M | $1.10B |
| Gross Margin | -29.8% | 54.8% | 33.3% | 43.2% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | -9.2% | 35.8% | 28.1% | 28.0% | 36.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.0x | 20.1x | 15.8x | 20.7x |
| Total Debt | $653K | $232M | $419M | $183M | $15.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $1K | $3M | $52K | $119M |
SCWO vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs AWK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 374Water, Inc. (SCWO) | 100 | 925.0 | +825.0% |
| The York Water Comp… (YORW) | 100 | 65.7 | -34.3% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 75.8 | -24.2% |
| Artesian Resources … (ARTNA) | 100 | 90.2 | -9.8% |
| American Water Work… (AWK) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCWO vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs AWK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SCWO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 16.1% 10Y total return vs AWK's 100.9%
- +6.3% vs MSEX's -12.8%
YORW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 25.9% margin vs SCWO's -9.1%
MSEX is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 3.2% ROA vs SCWO's -153.2%, ROIC 4.7% vs -196.4%
ARTNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 3.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 73.1%, current ratio 0.64x
- Beta 0.01, yield 3.9%, current ratio 0.64x
- Lower P/E (15.8x vs 20.1x), PEG 3.68 vs 12.58
AWK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 5.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.7%
- PEG 2.63 vs MSEX's 12.58
- 9.7% revenue growth vs SCWO's -40.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.7% revenue growth vs SCWO's -40.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 20.1x), PEG 3.68 vs 12.58 | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs SCWO's -9.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs SCWO's 2.58 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 31-year raise streak, vs AWK's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.3% vs MSEX's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs SCWO's -153.2%, ROIC 4.7% vs -196.4% |
SCWO vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs AWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SCWO vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs AWK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARTNA leads in 2 of 6 categories
YORW leads 1 • SCWO leads 1 • MSEX leads 0 • AWK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YORW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWK and YORW operate at a comparable scale, with $5.2B and -$18M in trailing revenue. YORW is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SCWO's -9.1%. On growth, SCWO holds the edge at +8.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | -$18M | $199M | $113M | $5.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | $42M | $81M | $45M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $21M | $44M | $23M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$30M | -$19M | $4M | -$1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -29.8% | +54.8% | +33.3% | +43.2% | +43.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.2% | +35.8% | +28.1% | +28.0% | +36.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.1% | +25.9% | +22.1% | +20.2% | +21.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | -24.3% | -9.7% | +3.3% | -23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | -100.0% | +10.0% | +4.3% | +5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -47.8% | +32.0% | -100.0% | +8.1% | -3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ARTNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, ARTNA trades at a 35% valuation discount to AWK's 22.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AWK offers better value at 2.81x vs MSEX's 13.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $342M | $421M | $955M | $326M | $24.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $332M | $653M | $1.4B | $509M | $40.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -24.00x | 20.99x | 21.78x | 14.33x | 22.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.01x | 20.12x | 15.84x | 20.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 11.52x | 13.62x | 3.33x | 2.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.56x | 15.79x | 10.29x | 14.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 768.80x | 5.43x | 4.91x | 2.89x | 4.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.29x | 1.75x | 1.89x | 1.31x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SCWO and AWK each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWK delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SCWO. SCWO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AWK's 1.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARTNA scores 5/9 vs SCWO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +8.9% | +9.1% | +9.3% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -153.2% | +3.2% | +3.2% | +2.8% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -196.4% | +4.6% | +4.7% | +6.3% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -83.1% | +4.4% | +4.4% | +4.5% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.97x | 0.85x | 0.73x | 1.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $232M | $416M | $183M | $15.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $1,000 | $3M | $52,000 | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $652,696 | $232M | $419M | $183M | $15.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.92x | 4.33x | 4.10x | 3.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SCWO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCWO five years ago would be worth $29,600 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,799 for YORW. Over the past 12 months, SCWO leads with a +632.9% total return vs MSEX's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWK at -2.8% vs ARTNA's -13.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.5% | -7.3% | +3.0% | +1.8% | -2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +632.9% | -9.4% | -12.8% | -3.9% | -12.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.1% | -25.9% | -25.2% | -35.9% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +196.0% | -32.0% | -28.4% | -7.8% | -8.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1607.7% | +25.0% | +62.9% | +48.5% | +100.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.0% | -9.5% | -9.2% | -13.8% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARTNA and AWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWK is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCWO's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARTNA currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs SCWO's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.58x | 0.08x | -0.12x | 0.01x | -0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.60 | $35.10 | $62.18 | $35.37 | $150.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.16 | $28.26 | $44.17 | $30.50 | $121.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.7% | +83.1% | +82.7% | +89.6% | +84.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 34.8 | 44.1 | 49.5 | 33.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 53K | 174K | 160K | 69K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
ARTNA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: YORW as "Hold", MSEX as "Buy", ARTNA as "Buy", AWK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.7% upside for AWK (target: $135) vs 4.1% for MSEX (target: $54). For income investors, ARTNA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.88% vs AWK's 2.57%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $53.50 | — | $134.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 4 | 4 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.0% | +2.7% | +3.9% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 31 | 21 | 31 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.88 | $1.37 | $1.23 | $3.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARTNA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). YORW leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SCWO vs YORW vs MSEX vs ARTNA vs AWK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCWO or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or AWK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -40. 1% for 374Water, Inc. (SCWO). Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCWO or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or AWK?
On trailing P/E, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the cheapest at 14.
3x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. at 22. 1x. On forward P/E, Artesian Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Water Works Company, Inc. wins at 2. 63x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCWO or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or AWK?
Over the past 5 years, 374Water, Inc.
(SCWO) delivered a total return of +196. 0%, compared to -32. 0% for The York Water Company (YORW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCWO returned +1608% versus YORW's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCWO or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or AWK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 48β versus 374Water, Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning SCWO is approximately -639% more volatile than AWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, 374Water, Inc. (SCWO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 147% for American Water Works Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SCWO or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or AWK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus -40. 1% for 374Water, Inc. (SCWO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Artesian Resources Corporation grew EPS 11. 6% year-over-year, compared to -48. 7% for 374Water, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SCWO leads at 110. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCWO or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or AWK?
The York Water Company (YORW) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
9% net margin versus -27. 9% for 374Water, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWK leads at 36. 6% versus -28. 7% for SCWO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YORW leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCWO or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or AWK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 63x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) trades at 15. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for American Water Works Company, Inc. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AWK: 6. 7% to $134. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCWO or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or AWK?
In this comparison, ARTNA (3.
9% yield), YORW (3. 0% yield), MSEX (2. 7% yield), AWK (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SCWO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SCWO or YORW or MSEX or ARTNA or AWK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 48), 2. 6% yield, +100. 9% 10Y return). 374Water, Inc. (SCWO) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWK: +100. 9%, SCWO: +1608%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCWO and YORW and MSEX and ARTNA and AWK?
These companies operate in different sectors (SCWO (Industrials) and YORW (Utilities) and MSEX (Utilities) and ARTNA (Utilities) and AWK (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SCWO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; YORW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARTNA is a small-cap deep-value stock; AWK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. YORW, MSEX, ARTNA, AWK pay a dividend while SCWO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.