Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SEG vs PRKS vs EPR vs FUN vs VICI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
REIT - Specialty
Leisure
REIT - Diversified
SEG vs PRKS vs EPR vs FUN vs VICI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Leisure | REIT - Specialty | Leisure | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $285M | $2.02B | $4.43B | $2.32B | $30.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $127M | $1.66B | $700M | $2.90B | $4.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-129M | $168M | $272M | $-1.62B | $3.10B |
| Gross Margin | -6.8% | 92.3% | 81.2% | 54.8% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | -90.8% | 22.0% | 58.3% | -44.9% | 98.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | 19.2x | — | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $156M | $0.00 | $3.14B | $5.43B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $100M | $99M | $91M | $563M |
SEG vs PRKS vs EPR vs FUN vs VICI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seaport Entertainme… (SEG) | 100 | 70.6 | -29.4% |
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 70.4 | -29.6% |
| EPR Properties (EPR) | 100 | 128.6 | +28.6% |
| Six Flags Entertain… (FUN) | 100 | 47.8 | -52.2% |
| VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEG vs PRKS vs EPR vs FUN vs VICI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 33.5%, current ratio 9.12x
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6%
PRKS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 10.1x)
EPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 6.6%
- Beta 0.35, yield 6.6%, current ratio 1.53x
- 6.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs VICI's 6.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +22.0% vs FUN's -37.0%
Among these 5 stocks, FUN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
VICI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 118.9% 10Y total return vs EPR's 28.4%
- 76.7% margin vs SEG's -101.5%
- Beta 0.22 vs FUN's 1.83
- 6.7% ROA vs SEG's -19.8%, ROIC 7.6% vs -14.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 10.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 76.7% margin vs SEG's -101.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs FUN's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs VICI's 6.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.0% vs FUN's -37.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs SEG's -19.8%, ROIC 7.6% vs -14.2% |
SEG vs PRKS vs EPR vs FUN vs VICI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SEG vs PRKS vs EPR vs FUN vs VICI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICI leads in 1 of 6 categories
PRKS leads 1 • EPR leads 1 • SEG leads 0 • FUN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 31.9x SEG's $127M. VICI is the more profitable business, keeping 76.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEG's -101.5%. On growth, EPR holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $127M | $1.7B | $700M | $2.9B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$71M | $540M | $582M | -$810M | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$129M | $168M | $272M | -$1.6B | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$36M | $263M | $435M | $29M | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | +92.3% | +81.2% | +54.8% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -90.8% | +22.0% | +58.3% | -44.9% | +98.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -101.5% | +10.1% | +38.8% | -56.0% | +76.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.3% | +15.8% | +62.1% | +1.0% | +63.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.7% | -2.8% | +10.9% | -100.0% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -38.2% | -44.0% | -5.1% | -20.5% | +60.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PRKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, VICI trades at a 37% valuation discount to EPR's 17.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EPR's 13.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $285M | $2.0B | $4.4B | $2.3B | $30.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $363M | $1.9B | $7.5B | $7.7B | $30.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.42x | 12.11x | 17.64x | -1.43x | 11.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.99x | 19.22x | — | 10.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 3.56x | 13.67x | — | 8.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.18x | 1.22x | 6.16x | 0.75x | 7.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | — | 1.90x | 2.94x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.68x | 10.51x | — | 12.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PRKS and VICI each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EPR delivers a 11.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-50 for FUN. SEG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUN's 6.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRKS scores 5/9 vs VICI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.0% | — | +11.7% | -50.4% | +11.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.8% | +6.4% | +4.8% | -18.5% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -14.2% | +25.5% | +5.3% | -15.1% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.5% | +15.8% | +7.2% | -17.7% | +8.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | — | 1.35x | 6.92x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $78M | -$100M | $3.0B | $5.3B | -$563M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $100M | $99M | $91M | $563M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $156M | $0 | $3.1B | $5.4B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -228.75x | 2.69x | 3.08x | -2.60x | 4.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EPR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EPR five years ago would be worth $14,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,201 for FUN. Over the past 12 months, EPR leads with a +22.0% total return vs FUN's -37.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EPR at 17.2% vs FUN's -16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.1% | +2.3% | +16.4% | +46.9% | +3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.1% | -18.7% | +22.0% | -37.0% | -3.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.6% | -34.3% | +61.0% | -41.3% | +2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.6% | -31.0% | +49.6% | -48.0% | +17.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.6% | +103.5% | +28.4% | -33.1% | +118.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.4% | -13.1% | +17.2% | -16.3% | +1.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EPR and VICI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VICI is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUN's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EPR currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs FUN's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.54x | 0.35x | 1.83x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.34 | $56.95 | $62.08 | $38.47 | $34.01 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.28 | $28.77 | $48.11 | $12.51 | $26.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.5% | +65.1% | +93.2% | +59.1% | +84.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 54.8 | 57.6 | 58.0 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 57K | 944K | 818K | 1.7M | 7.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EPR and VICI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SEG as "Buy", PRKS as "Buy", EPR as "Hold", FUN as "Buy", VICI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.4% upside for PRKS (target: $48) vs 0.6% for FUN (target: $23). For income investors, EPR offers the higher dividend yield at 6.57% vs VICI's 6.06%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $47.60 | $59.13 | $22.88 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 23 | 21 | 29 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +6.6% | — | +6.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.80 | — | $1.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VICI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PRKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SEG vs PRKS vs EPR vs FUN vs VICI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEG or PRKS or EPR or FUN or VICI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.
(SEG) is the stronger pick with 17. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (SEG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEG or PRKS or EPR or FUN or VICI?
On trailing P/E, VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus EPR Properties at 17. 6x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEG or PRKS or EPR or FUN or VICI?
Over the past 5 years, EPR Properties (EPR) delivered a total return of +49.
6%, compared to -48. 0% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICI returned +118. 9% versus FUN's -33. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEG or PRKS or EPR or FUN or VICI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning FUN is approximately 746% more volatile than VICI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (SEG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 7% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEG or PRKS or EPR or FUN or VICI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.
(SEG) is pulling ahead at 17. 3% versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: EPR Properties grew EPS 105. 0% year-over-year, compared to -591. 3% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 19. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEG or PRKS or EPR or FUN or VICI?
VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the more profitable company, earning 69. 3% net margin versus -89. 5% for Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 69. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VICI leads at 91. 1% versus -80. 0% for SEG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VICI leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEG or PRKS or EPR or FUN or VICI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 19. 2x for EPR Properties — 9. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRKS: 28. 4% to $47. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEG or PRKS or EPR or FUN or VICI?
In this comparison, EPR (6.
6% yield), VICI (6. 1% yield) pay a dividend. SEG, PRKS, FUN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SEG or PRKS or EPR or FUN or VICI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 6. 1% yield, +118. 9% 10Y return). Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VICI: +118. 9%, FUN: -33. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEG and PRKS and EPR and FUN and VICI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEG (Real Estate) and PRKS (Consumer Cyclical) and EPR (Real Estate) and FUN (Consumer Cyclical) and VICI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SEG is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock; EPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VICI is a mid-cap deep-value stock. EPR, VICI pay a dividend while SEG, PRKS, FUN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.