Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SEGG vs GENI vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
SEGG vs GENI vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $1M | $1.17B | $12.50B | $17.64B | $2.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $902K | $669M | $6.05B | $17.02B | $1.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $-112M | $4M | $-455M | $37M |
| Gross Margin | 29.3% | 22.9% | 41.3% | 44.2% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | -16.7% | -18.1% | -0.2% | 4.4% | 9.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 52.4x | 99.1x | 16.5x | 46.5x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $30M | $1.93B | $13.35B | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68K | $281M | $1.60B | $3.83B | $341M |
SEGG vs GENI vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lottery.com Inc. (SEGG) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| Genius Sports Limit… (GENI) | 100 | 77.0 | -23.0% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 94.9 | -5.1% |
| Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT) | 100 | 52.0 | -48.0% |
| Rush Street Interac… (RSI) | 100 | 893.9 | +793.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEGG vs GENI vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEGG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GENI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 31.0% revenue growth vs SEGG's -84.8%
DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
FLUT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 46.5x)
RSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07
- 189.9% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 157.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 1.93x
- Beta 1.07, current ratio 1.93x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.0% revenue growth vs SEGG's -84.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 46.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs SEGG's -23.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs GENI's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +138.2% vs SEGG's -84.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs SEGG's -28.4% |
SEGG vs GENI vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SEGG vs GENI vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RSI leads in 4 of 6 categories
FLUT leads 1 • SEGG leads 0 • GENI leads 0 • DKNG leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLUT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 18869.2x SEGG's $902,106. RSI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEGG's -23.1%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $902,106 | $669M | $6.1B | $17.0B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$50M | $266M | $2.0B | $156M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | -$112M | $4M | -$455M | $37M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $37M | $612M | $880M | $147M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +22.9% | +41.3% | +44.2% | +34.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.7% | -18.1% | -0.2% | +4.4% | +9.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -23.1% | -16.7% | +0.1% | -2.7% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.3% | +5.5% | +10.1% | +5.2% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.4% | +37.0% | +42.8% | +17.4% | +41.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.9% | +33.8% | +192.9% | -22.3% | +60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FLUT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FLUT's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $1.2B | $12.5B | $17.6B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $924M | $12.8B | $27.2B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -10.83x | -3113.58x | -58.47x | 199.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 52.42x | 99.14x | 16.51x | 46.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 49.42x | 10.69x | 20.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | 1.75x | 2.06x | 1.08x | 2.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 1.68x | 19.81x | 1.87x | 21.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.18x | 19.31x | 16.35x | 18.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RSI delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-48 for SEGG. GENI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs SEGG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.9% | -15.5% | +0.5% | -4.3% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.4% | -11.1% | +0.1% | -1.6% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.5% | -16.6% | -0.9% | +4.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -61.4% | -15.3% | -0.6% | +4.6% | +26.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.04x | 3.06x | 1.38x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$250M | $330M | $9.5B | -$322M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68,035 | $281M | $1.6B | $3.8B | $341M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $30M | $1.9B | $13.3B | $18M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -86.34x | -136.57x | 1.92x | 0.04x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RSI five years ago would be worth $21,388 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $267 for SEGG. Over the past 12 months, RSI leads with a +138.2% total return vs SEGG's -84.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSI at 105.4% vs SEGG's -70.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +101.2% | -55.8% | -29.3% | -53.7% | +44.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.2% | -53.1% | -27.3% | -58.3% | +138.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | +17.4% | +4.3% | -49.0% | +766.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -74.6% | -47.9% | -50.7% | +113.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -52.4% | +157.3% | -22.9% | +189.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.1% | +5.5% | +1.4% | -20.1% | +105.4% |
Risk & Volatility
RSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RSI is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GENI's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSI currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs SEGG's 5.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | 1.50x | 1.12x | 1.23x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.40 | $13.73 | $48.78 | $313.69 | $29.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.46 | $3.83 | $20.46 | $97.94 | $11.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.3% | +34.7% | +51.7% | +32.2% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.2 | 45.3 | 55.1 | 35.0 | 69.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 5.6M | 12.9M | 3.4M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GENI as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", FLUT as "Buy", RSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 153.9% upside for GENI (target: $12) vs 9.0% for RSI (target: $30).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.10 | $36.88 | $227.86 | $30.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 48 | 24 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.6% | +6.4% | +0.3% |
RSI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLUT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
SEGG vs GENI vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEGG or GENI or DKNG or FLUT or RSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -84. 8% for Lottery. com Inc. (SEGG). Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) offers the better valuation at 199. 2x trailing P/E (46. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Genius Sports Limited (GENI) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEGG or GENI or DKNG or FLUT or RSI?
On forward P/E, Flutter Entertainment plc is actually cheaper at 16.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEGG or GENI or DKNG or FLUT or RSI?
Over the past 5 years, Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) delivered a total return of +113. 9%, compared to -97. 3% for Lottery. com Inc. (SEGG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RSI returned +189. 9% versus SEGG's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEGG or GENI or DKNG or FLUT or RSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus Genius Sports Limited's 1. 50β — meaning GENI is approximately 40% more volatile than RSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEGG or GENI or DKNG or FLUT or RSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.
0% versus -84. 8% for Lottery. com Inc. (SEGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rush Street Interactive, Inc. grew EPS 418. 5% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEGG or GENI or DKNG or FLUT or RSI?
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -26. 9% for Lottery. com Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RSI leads at 7. 7% versus -1704. 1% for SEGG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEGG leads at 69. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEGG or GENI or DKNG or FLUT or RSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) trades at 16.
5x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 82. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GENI: 153. 9% to $12. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEGG or GENI or DKNG or FLUT or RSI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SEGG or GENI or DKNG or FLUT or RSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07), +189. 9% 10Y return). Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RSI: +189. 9%, GENI: -52. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEGG and GENI and DKNG and FLUT and RSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEGG (Communication Services) and GENI (Communication Services) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and FLUT (Consumer Cyclical) and RSI (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SEGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RSI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 18%
- Gross Margin > 13%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.