Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SEMR vs BRZE vs HUBS vs GOOGL vs META
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
SEMR vs BRZE vs HUBS vs GOOGL vs META — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.81B | $2.31B | $12.58B | $4.81T | $1.56T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $444M | $738M | $3.30B | $422.57B | $214.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-131M | $100M | $160.21B | $70.59B |
| Gross Margin | 80.5% | 67.1% | 83.7% | 60.4% | 81.9% |
| Operating Margin | -5.1% | -19.6% | 1.9% | 32.7% | 41.2% |
| Forward P/E | 30.4x | 35.7x | 19.6x | 29.6x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $83M | $485M | $59.29B | $83.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $264M | $124M | $882M | $30.71B | $35.87B |
SEMR vs BRZE vs HUBS vs GOOGL vs META — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semrush Holdings, I… (SEMR) | 100 | 58.5 | -41.5% |
| Braze, Inc. (BRZE) | 100 | 31.0 | -69.0% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 30.3 | -69.7% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 202.6 | +102.6% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 176.3 | +76.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEMR vs BRZE vs HUBS vs GOOGL vs META
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEMR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 2.11x
BRZE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 24.4%, EPS growth -19.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.6%
- 24.4% revenue growth vs GOOGL's 15.1%
HUBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.
- Lower P/E (19.6x vs 20.4x)
- Beta 1.18 vs META's 1.59, lower leverage
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.2%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs META's 421.2%
- PEG 0.99 vs META's 1.11
- 37.9% margin vs BRZE's -17.8%
META is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.59, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.60x
- 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.4% revenue growth vs GOOGL's 15.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.6x vs 20.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs BRZE's -17.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs META's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs HUBS's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs BRZE's -12.9%, ROIC 25.1% vs -20.5% |
SEMR vs BRZE vs HUBS vs GOOGL vs META — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SEMR vs BRZE vs HUBS vs GOOGL vs META — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
META leads in 2 of 6 categories
GOOGL leads 2 • SEMR leads 0 • BRZE leads 0 • HUBS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
META leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 952.5x SEMR's $444M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRZE's -17.8%. On growth, META holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $444M | $738M | $3.3B | $422.6B | $215.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$131M | $166M | $161.3B | $109.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$131M | $100M | $160.2B | $70.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $53M | $61M | $712M | $73.3B | $48.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.5% | +67.1% | +83.7% | +60.4% | +81.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | -19.6% | +1.9% | +32.7% | +41.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -17.8% | +3.0% | +37.9% | +32.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +8.2% | +21.6% | +17.3% | +22.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.6% | +27.9% | +23.4% | +21.8% | +33.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.4% | -70.6% | +2.5% | +81.9% | +62.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BRZE and HUBS each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.3x trailing earnings, META trades at a 91% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.23x vs META's 1.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $2.3B | $12.6B | $4.81T | $1.56T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $2.3B | $12.2B | $4.84T | $1.61T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -92.35x | -18.52x | 284.08x | 36.82x | 26.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.39x | 35.72x | 19.61x | 29.61x | 20.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.23x | 1.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 69.24x | 32.22x | 15.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.09x | 3.13x | 4.02x | 11.95x | 7.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.13x | 3.91x | 6.29x | 11.72x | 7.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.41x | 37.34x | 17.77x | 65.72x | 33.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-23 for BRZE. SEMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to META's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs BRZE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.6% | -22.8% | +5.0% | +39.0% | +33.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.3% | -12.9% | +2.7% | +27.4% | +20.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.7% | -20.5% | +0.4% | +25.1% | +27.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.9% | -23.4% | +0.5% | +30.3% | +29.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.13x | 0.23x | 0.14x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$252M | -$42M | -$397M | $28.6B | $48.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $264M | $124M | $882M | $30.7B | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $83M | $485M | $59.3B | $83.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 4753.07x | 392.15x | 78.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,420 for BRZE. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs HUBS's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs HUBS's -18.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.0% | -30.6% | -36.1% | +26.4% | -5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.5% | -30.7% | -62.0% | +163.5% | +3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.0% | -20.7% | -45.1% | +270.8% | +166.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.0% | -75.8% | -52.1% | +239.8% | +94.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.3% | -75.8% | +469.1% | +996.1% | +421.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.9% | -7.4% | -18.1% | +54.8% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SEMR and HUBS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUBS is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than META's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEMR currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs HUBS's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.27x | 1.18x | 1.26x | 1.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.01 | $37.67 | $682.57 | $400.10 | $796.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.56 | $15.26 | $187.45 | $147.84 | $520.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +60.0% | +35.8% | +99.5% | +77.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.1 | 47.6 | 51.1 | 83.4 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 3.0M | 1.5M | 28.3M | 15.6M |
Analyst Outlook
META leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SEMR as "Hold", BRZE as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", META as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 87.8% upside for BRZE (target: $42) vs -0.0% for SEMR (target: $12). For income investors, META offers the higher dividend yield at 0.34% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $42.44 | $360.89 | $406.28 | $821.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 25 | 47 | 82 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.82 | $2.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +0.9% | +1.7% |
META leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). GOOGL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
SEMR vs BRZE vs HUBS vs GOOGL vs META: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEMR or BRZE or HUBS or GOOGL or META a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Braze, Inc.
(BRZE) is the stronger pick with 24. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 1% for Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL). Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) offers the better valuation at 26. 3x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Braze, Inc. (BRZE) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEMR or BRZE or HUBS or GOOGL or META?
On trailing P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the cheapest at 26. 3x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x. On forward P/E, HubSpot, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEMR or BRZE or HUBS or GOOGL or META?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -75. 8% for Braze, Inc. (BRZE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus BRZE's -75. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEMR or BRZE or HUBS or GOOGL or META?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning META is approximately 35% more volatile than HUBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Semrush Holdings, Inc. (SEMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 39% for Meta Platforms, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEMR or BRZE or HUBS or GOOGL or META?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Braze, Inc.
(BRZE) is pulling ahead at 24. 4% versus 15. 1% for Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -335. 1% for Semrush Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRZE leads at 27. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEMR or BRZE or HUBS or GOOGL or META?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -17. 8% for Braze, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus -19. 6% for BRZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEMR or BRZE or HUBS or GOOGL or META more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) trades at 19. 6x forward P/E versus 35. 7x for Braze, Inc. — 16. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRZE: 87. 8% to $42. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEMR or BRZE or HUBS or GOOGL or META?
In this comparison, META (0.
3% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SEMR, BRZE, HUBS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SEMR or BRZE or HUBS or GOOGL or META better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +996. 1%, BRZE: -75. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEMR and BRZE and HUBS and GOOGL and META?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEMR (Technology) and BRZE (Technology) and HUBS (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and META (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.