Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SENEA vs CAG vs CPB vs SJM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
SENEA vs CAG vs CPB vs SJM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $730M | $6.86B | $6.34B | $10.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.61B | $11.18B | $10.04B | $8.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $90M | $13M | $550M | $-1.26B |
| Gross Margin | 12.6% | 24.6% | 29.3% | 33.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | 13.1% | 12.1% | -8.0% |
| Forward P/E | 74.5x | 8.4x | 9.7x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $375M | $8.31B | $7.21B | $7.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $68M | $132M | $70M |
SENEA vs CAG vs CPB vs SJM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seneca Foods Corpor… (SENEA) | 100 | 384.1 | +284.1% |
| Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Campbell Soup Compa… (CPB) | 100 | 41.7 | -58.3% |
| The J. M. Smucker C… (SJM) | 100 | 87.3 | -12.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SENEA vs CAG vs CPB vs SJM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SENEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth -31.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
- 315.4% 10Y total return vs SJM's 5.6%
- 8.2% revenue growth vs CAG's -4.8%
- 5.6% margin vs SJM's -14.1%
CAG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 11.0x)
- 9.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs SJM's 4.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
CPB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SJM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 4.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.04, current ratio 0.81x
- Beta 0.04, yield 4.3%, current ratio 0.81x
- Beta 0.04 vs SENEA's 0.22
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs CAG's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 11.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.6% margin vs SJM's -14.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs SENEA's 0.22 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs SJM's 4.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.4% vs CPB's -35.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.4% ROA vs SJM's -7.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs -3.4% |
SENEA vs CAG vs CPB vs SJM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SENEA vs CAG vs CPB vs SJM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SENEA leads in 2 of 6 categories
SJM leads 1 • CAG leads 1 • CPB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SJM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAG is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.2B annually — 6.9x SENEA's $1.6B. SENEA is the more profitable business, keeping 5.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SJM's -14.1%. On growth, SJM holds the edge at +7.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $11.2B | $10.0B | $8.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $171M | $1.9B | $1.6B | -$595M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $90M | $13M | $550M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $168M | $634M | $919M | $971M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +24.6% | +29.3% | +33.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +13.1% | +12.1% | -8.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +0.1% | +5.5% | -14.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +5.7% | +9.2% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.1% | -6.8% | -4.5% | +7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | -3.4% | -17.2% | -9.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CAG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, CAG trades at a 75% valuation discount to SENEA's 23.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CAG offers better value at 0.85x vs SENEA's 21.17x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $730M | $6.9B | $6.3B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $15.1B | $13.4B | $18.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.74x | 5.95x | 10.57x | -8.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 74.51x | 8.44x | 9.74x | 11.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 21.17x | 0.85x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.66x | 8.61x | 7.51x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 0.59x | 0.62x | 1.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 0.77x | 1.63x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.45x | 5.27x | 8.99x | 12.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SENEA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CPB delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-24 for SJM. SENEA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPB's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPB scores 7/9 vs SJM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +0.2% | +14.0% | -24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.4% | +0.1% | +3.7% | -7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +6.0% | +9.1% | -3.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.1% | +8.2% | +11.4% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.93x | 1.85x | 1.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $332M | $8.2B | $7.1B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $68M | $132M | $70M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $375M | $8.3B | $7.2B | $7.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.90x | 1.56x | 3.14x | -1.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SENEA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SENEA five years ago would be worth $28,518 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,565 for CAG. Over the past 12 months, SENEA leads with a +56.4% total return vs CPB's -35.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SENEA at 43.1% vs CPB's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.4% | -13.0% | -20.5% | +4.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.4% | -31.5% | -35.4% | -7.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.1% | -50.8% | -52.6% | -28.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +185.2% | -44.3% | -41.9% | -12.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +315.4% | -27.9% | -44.9% | +5.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.1% | -21.1% | -22.0% | -10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SENEA and CPB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPB is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SENEA's 0.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SENEA currently trades 83.7% from its 52-week high vs CPB's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.06x | -0.02x | 0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $167.33 | $23.47 | $36.16 | $119.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $85.20 | $13.61 | $19.76 | $88.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.7% | +61.1% | +58.8% | +83.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 36.1 | 46.7 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 106K | 14.1M | 9.1M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CAG and SJM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAG as "Hold", CPB as "Hold", SJM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.3% upside for CAG (target: $18) vs 14.0% for SJM (target: $113). For income investors, CAG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.75% vs SJM's 4.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.55 | $25.83 | $113.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 | 29 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +9.8% | +7.2% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 6 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | $1.40 | $1.53 | $4.28 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.9% | +1.0% | +0.0% |
SENEA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SJM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SENEA vs CAG vs CPB vs SJM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SENEA or CAG or CPB or SJM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) is the stronger pick with 8.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Campbell Soup Company (CPB). Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) a "Hold" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SENEA or CAG or CPB or SJM?
On trailing P/E, Conagra Brands, Inc.
(CAG) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Seneca Foods Corporation at 23. 7x. On forward P/E, Conagra Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Conagra Brands, Inc. wins at 1. 21x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 66. 44x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SENEA or CAG or CPB or SJM?
Over the past 5 years, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) delivered a total return of +185.
2%, compared to -44. 3% for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SENEA returned +315. 4% versus CPB's -44. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SENEA or CAG or CPB or SJM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 0. 22β — meaning SENEA is approximately -1370% more volatile than CPB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 185% for Campbell Soup Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SENEA or CAG or CPB or SJM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) is pulling ahead at 8.
2% versus 6. 4% for Campbell Soup Company (CPB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Campbell Soup Company grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -262. 3% for The J. M. Smucker Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPB leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SENEA or CAG or CPB or SJM?
Conagra Brands, Inc.
(CAG) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus -14. 1% for The J. M. Smucker Company — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPB leads at 13. 2% versus -7. 7% for SJM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SJM leads at 38. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SENEA or CAG or CPB or SJM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 21x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 66. 44x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 74. 5x for Seneca Foods Corporation — 66. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAG: 22. 3% to $17. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — SENEA or CAG or CPB or SJM?
In this comparison, CAG (9.
8% yield), CPB (7. 2% yield), SJM (4. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SENEA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SENEA or CAG or CPB or SJM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
02), 7. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPB: -44. 9%, SENEA: +315. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SENEA and CAG and CPB and SJM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SENEA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CAG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SJM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. CAG, CPB, SJM pay a dividend while SENEA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.