Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SEPN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs MRK vs ABBV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SEPN
Septerna, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.07B
5Y Perf.+4.3%
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • FR
Market Cap$1690.08T
5Y Perf.+304.3%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.88B
5Y Perf.-1.1%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$275.10B
5Y Perf.+8.9%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$356.49B
5Y Perf.-1.1%

SEPN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs MRK vs ABBV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SEPN logoSEPN
DBVT logoDBVT
IMVT logoIMVT
MRK logoMRK
ABBV logoABBV
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - GeneralDrug Manufacturers - General
Market Cap$1.07B$1690.08T$5.88B$275.10B$356.49B
Revenue (TTM)$46M$0.00$0.00$64.93B$61.16B
Net Income (TTM)$-49M$-168M$-464M$18.25B$4.23B
Gross Margin74.2%70.2%
Operating Margin-148.6%41.1%26.7%
Forward P/E21.7x14.2x
Total Debt$24M$22M$98K$50.53B$69.07B
Cash & Equiv.$121M$194M$714M$14.56B$5.23B

SEPN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs MRK vs ABBVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SEPN
DBVT
IMVT
MRK
ABBV
StockOct 24May 26Return
Septerna, Inc. (SEPN)100104.3+4.3%
DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT)100404.3+304.3%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)10098.9-1.1%
Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)100108.9+8.9%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)10098.9-1.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SEPN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs MRK vs ABBV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ABBV leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Septerna, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. MRK also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SEPN
Septerna, Inc.
The Growth Play

SEPN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 84.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 6.2%, current ratio 4.73x
  • 41.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
  • +243.5% vs ABBV's +12.2%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Healthcare Pick

DBVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
The Quality Compounder

MRK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.

  • 28.1% margin vs SEPN's -106.4%
  • 14.6% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
The Income Pick

ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 3.3%
  • 293.8% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 190.9%
  • Beta 0.28, yield 3.3%, current ratio 0.67x
  • Lower P/E (14.2x vs 21.7x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSEPN logoSEPN41.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
ValueABBV logoABBVLower P/E (14.2x vs 21.7x)
Quality / MarginsMRK logoMRK28.1% margin vs SEPN's -106.4%
Stability / SafetyABBV logoABBVBeta 0.28 vs IMVT's 1.36
DividendsABBV logoABBV3.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs MRK's 2.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SEPN logoSEPN+243.5% vs ABBV's +12.2%
Efficiency (ROA)MRK logoMRK14.6% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%

SEPN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs MRK vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SEPNSepterna, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MRKMerck & Co., Inc.
FY 2025
Pharmaceutical segment
89.4%$58.1B
Animal Health segment
9.8%$6.4B
Other Segments
0.8%$515M
ABBVAbbVie Inc.
FY 2025
SKYRIZI
30.2%$17.6B
RINVOQ
14.3%$8.3B
H U M I R A
7.8%$4.5B
Botox Therapeutic
6.5%$3.8B
Vraylar
6.2%$3.6B
Imbruvica
4.9%$2.9B
VENCLEXTA
4.8%$2.8B
Other (14)
25.3%$14.7B

SEPN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs MRK vs ABBV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIMVTLAGGINGABBV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MRK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MRK and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $64.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. MRK is the more profitable business, keeping 28.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEPN's -106.4%. On growth, SEPN holds the edge at +112.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSEPN logoSEPNSepterna, Inc.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.MRK logoMRKMerck & Co., Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$46M$0$0$64.9B$61.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$68M-$112M-$487M$32.4B$24.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$49M-$168M-$464M$18.3B$4.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$110M-$151M-$423M$12.4B$18.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+74.2%+70.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-148.6%+41.1%+26.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-106.4%+28.1%+6.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.4%+19.0%+30.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+112.8%+4.5%+10.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+64.1%+91.5%+19.7%-19.6%+57.4%
MRK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — SEPN and MRK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.3x trailing earnings, MRK trades at a 82% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MRK's 10.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 14.9x.

MetricSEPN logoSEPNSepterna, Inc.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.MRK logoMRKMerck & Co., Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$1690.08T$5.9B$275.1B$356.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$972M$1690.08T$5.2B$311.1B$420.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-21.70x-0.75x-10.60x15.30x85.04x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.21.69x14.17x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.72x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.61x14.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue23.28x4.24x5.83x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.77x0.65x6.20x5.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.75x22.26x20.01x
Evenly matched — SEPN and MRK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — IMVT and MRK and ABBV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MRK's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSEPN logoSEPNSepterna, Inc.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.MRK logoMRKMerck & Co., Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-12.6%-130.2%-47.1%+36.1%+62.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-9.5%-89.0%-44.1%+14.6%+3.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-20.8%+22.0%+23.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-14.3%-145.7%-66.1%+23.8%+21.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954246
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x0.13x0.00x0.96x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$97M-$172M-$714M$36.0B$63.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$121M$194M$714M$14.6B$5.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$24M$22M$98,000$50.5B$69.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-189.82x19.68x3.28x
Evenly matched — IMVT and MRK and ABBV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IMVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $19,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,172 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, SEPN leads with a +243.5% total return vs ABBV's +12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 14.4% vs MRK's 0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSEPN logoSEPNSepterna, Inc.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.MRK logoMRKMerck & Co., Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-14.7%+3.6%+11.7%+5.4%-10.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+243.5%+100.5%+102.4%+47.7%+12.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+11.5%+18.1%+49.8%+2.1%+49.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+11.5%-68.3%+84.4%+69.5%+99.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+11.5%-87.1%+190.9%+164.7%+293.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+3.7%+5.7%+14.4%+0.7%+14.4%
IMVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IMVT and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs SEPN's 73.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSEPN logoSEPNSepterna, Inc.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.MRK logoMRKMerck & Co., Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.24x1.26x1.36x0.45x0.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$32.63$26.18$30.09$125.14$244.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.44$7.53$13.36$73.31$176.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+73.2%+75.3%+96.2%+89.0%+82.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.947.450.643.743.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded302K252K1.4M7.2M5.8M
Evenly matched — IMVT and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MRK and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SEPN as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", MRK as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 16.1% for MRK (target: $129). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 3.26% vs MRK's 2.93%.

MetricSEPN logoSEPNSepterna, Inc.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.MRK logoMRKMerck & Co., Inc.ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$39.00$46.33$45.50$129.31$256.69
# AnalystsCovering analysts615233741
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.9%+3.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01413
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.26$6.57
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.8%+0.3%
Evenly matched — MRK and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MRK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). IMVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallImmunovant, Inc. (IMVT)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SEPN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs MRK vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SEPN or DBVT or IMVT or MRK or ABBV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Septerna, Inc.

(SEPN) is the stronger pick with 41. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for Merck & Co. , Inc. (MRK). Merck & Co. , Inc. (MRK) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Septerna, Inc. (SEPN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SEPN or DBVT or IMVT or MRK or ABBV?

On trailing P/E, Merck & Co.

, Inc. (MRK) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 0x. On forward P/E, AbbVie Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SEPN or DBVT or IMVT or MRK or ABBV?

Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) delivered a total return of +99. 6%, compared to -68. 3% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +293. 8% versus DBVT's -87. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SEPN or DBVT or IMVT or MRK or ABBV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning IMVT is approximately 392% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 96% for Merck & Co. , Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SEPN or DBVT or IMVT or MRK or ABBV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Septerna, Inc.

(SEPN) is pulling ahead at 41. 7% versus 1. 2% for Merck & Co. , Inc. (MRK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Septerna, Inc. grew EPS 84. 8% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MRK leads at 3. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SEPN or DBVT or IMVT or MRK or ABBV?

Merck & Co.

, Inc. (MRK) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 1% net margin versus -106. 4% for Septerna, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRK leads at 36. 2% versus -148. 6% for SEPN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MRK leads at 72. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SEPN or DBVT or IMVT or MRK or ABBV more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Merck & Co. , Inc. — 7. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 134. 8% to $46. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SEPN or DBVT or IMVT or MRK or ABBV?

In this comparison, ABBV (3.

3% yield), MRK (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SEPN, DBVT, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SEPN or DBVT or IMVT or MRK or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 3. 3% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +293. 8%, DBVT: -87. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SEPN and DBVT and IMVT and MRK and ABBV?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SEPN is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MRK is a large-cap deep-value stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. MRK, ABBV pay a dividend while SEPN, DBVT, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SEPN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5638%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DBVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MRK

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ABBV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.