Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SFBC vs BSVN vs FFIN vs HFWA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SFBC vs BSVN vs FFIN vs HFWA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $107M | $419M | $4.65B | $926M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62M | $137M | $739M | $336M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $43M | $243M | $68M |
| Gross Margin | 63.1% | 70.2% | 70.8% | 72.4% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 41.4% | 36.8% | 23.2% |
| Forward P/E | 15.0x | 10.0x | 16.1x | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $0.00 | $197M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $138M | $245M | $763M | $53M |
SFBC vs BSVN vs FFIN vs HFWA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sound Financial Ban… (SFBC) | 100 | 172.8 | +72.8% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 407.6 | +307.6% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 113.1 | +13.1% |
| Heritage Financial … (HFWA) | 100 | 136.3 | +36.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFBC vs BSVN vs FFIN vs HFWA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SFBC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 19.6%, current ratio 0.15x
- Beta 0.27 vs HFWA's 0.96
BSVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 157.6% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 128.6%
- PEG 0.58 vs FFIN's 3.08
- Beta 0.75, yield 2.2%, current ratio 502.78x
- NIM 4.5% vs FFIN's 3.1%
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and dividends is your priority.
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9%
- 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs HFWA's 3.5%
HFWA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 3.5%
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 58.1%
- +20.4% vs SFBC's -15.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 13.2x), PEG 0.58 vs 1.52 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs HFWA's 0.96 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs HFWA's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.4% vs SFBC's -15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% |
SFBC vs BSVN vs FFIN vs HFWA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SFBC vs BSVN vs FFIN vs HFWA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSVN leads in 3 of 6 categories
SFBC leads 0 • FFIN leads 0 • HFWA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BSVN and HFWA each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $739M annually — 12.0x SFBC's $62M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFBC's 11.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $137M | $739M | $336M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | $58M | $310M | $80M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $43M | $243M | $68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $36M | $290M | $86M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.1% | +70.2% | +70.8% | +72.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +41.4% | +36.8% | +23.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +31.4% | +30.2% | +20.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +33.6% | +39.6% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.6% | -3.4% | -7.7% | +85.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BSVN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 53% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.58x vs FFIN's 4.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $107M | $419M | $4.6B | $926M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$10M | $174M | $4.1B | $916M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.01x | 9.84x | 20.95x | 13.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.96x | 16.06x | 13.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.58x | 4.02x | 1.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -1.13x | 3.00x | 14.31x | 11.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.74x | 3.05x | 6.29x | 2.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 1.69x | 2.91x | 1.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.33x | 9.08x | 15.87x | 10.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $7 for SFBC. HFWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFBC's 0.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFWA scores 9/9 vs BSVN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +18.2% | +13.3% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +2.3% | +1.6% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +18.3% | +11.0% | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +5.2% | +16.0% | +4.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | — | 0.12x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$117M | -$245M | -$566M | -$10M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $138M | $245M | $763M | $53M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $0 | $197M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 1.39x | 1.48x | 0.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BSVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $26,128 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,087 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, HFWA leads with a +20.4% total return vs SFBC's -15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSVN at 26.4% vs SFBC's 5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.1% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +17.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.0% | +16.1% | -5.5% | +20.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.3% | +102.0% | +30.3% | +80.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | +161.3% | -29.1% | +8.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.9% | +157.6% | +128.6% | +95.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.5% | +26.4% | +9.2% | +21.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFBC and HFWA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SFBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HFWA's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HFWA currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs SFBC's 82.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.75x | 0.87x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.69 | $50.10 | $38.74 | $28.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.67 | $36.91 | $28.11 | $21.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.3% | +88.3% | +84.4% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 59.6 | 59.1 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 12K | 665K | 271K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIN and HFWA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BSVN as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", HFWA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.8% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs 15.0% for HFWA (target: $31). For income investors, HFWA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.48% vs SFBC's 1.81%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $57.00 | $39.25 | $31.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 15 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +2.2% | +2.2% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 11 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.76 | $0.98 | $0.72 | $0.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
BSVN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
SFBC vs BSVN vs FFIN vs HFWA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFBC or BSVN or FFIN or HFWA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFBC or BSVN or FFIN or HFWA?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 9x. On forward P/E, Bank7 Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 58x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFBC or BSVN or FFIN or HFWA?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +161. 3%, compared to -29. 1% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSVN returned +157. 6% versus HFWA's +95. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFBC or BSVN or FFIN or HFWA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
(SFBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Heritage Financial Corporation's 0. 96β — meaning HFWA is approximately 252% more volatile than SFBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 20% for Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SFBC or BSVN or FFIN or HFWA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Financial Corporation grew EPS 58. 1% year-over-year, compared to -7. 0% for Bank7 Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SFBC or BSVN or FFIN or HFWA?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 11. 6% for Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 14. 1% for SFBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HFWA leads at 72. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SFBC or BSVN or FFIN or HFWA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 1x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 28. 8% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SFBC or BSVN or FFIN or HFWA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 8% for Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. (SFBC).
09Is SFBC or BSVN or FFIN or HFWA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
(SFBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 1. 8% yield, +105. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SFBC: +105. 9%, HFWA: +95. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SFBC and BSVN and FFIN and HFWA?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; HFWA is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.