Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SFBS vs CVBF vs FFIN vs BOKF vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
SFBS vs CVBF vs FFIN vs BOKF vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $4.34B | $2.78B | $4.61B | $10.28B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.02B | $643M | $739M | $3.36B | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $277M | $209M | $243M | $537M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 51.8% | 79.9% | 70.8% | 57.1% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 33.6% | 43.8% | 36.8% | 19.8% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | 14.2x | 15.9x | 13.0x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.51B | $991M | $197M | $4.45B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $95M | $108M | $763M | $1.43B | $599M |
SFBS vs CVBF vs FFIN vs BOKF vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ServisFirst Bancsha… (SFBS) | 100 | 227.6 | +127.6% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFBS vs CVBF vs FFIN vs BOKF vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SFBS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 255.0% 10Y total return vs BOKF's 168.5%
CVBF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 4.0%
- 32.5% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- NIM 3.1% vs BOKF's 2.4%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
- 1.6% ROA vs BOKF's 1.1%, ROIC 11.0% vs 4.1%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +44.8% vs FIS's -35.3%
FIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.31 vs CVBF's 4.48
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 3.05
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.5% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs SFBS's 1.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs BOKF's 1.1%, ROIC 11.0% vs 4.1% |
SFBS vs CVBF vs FFIN vs BOKF vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SFBS vs CVBF vs FFIN vs BOKF vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • FFIN leads 1 • BOKF leads 1 • SFBS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 16.9x CVBF's $643M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $643M | $739M | $3.4B | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $346M | $294M | $310M | $797M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $277M | $209M | $243M | $537M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $256M | $217M | $290M | $1.5B | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.8% | +79.9% | +70.8% | +57.1% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +43.8% | +36.8% | +19.8% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.2% | +32.5% | +30.2% | +15.6% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +33.8% | +39.6% | +42.6% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.8% | +11.1% | -7.7% | +1.8% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, CVBF trades at a 79% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SFBS offers better value at 1.56x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $2.8B | $4.6B | $10.3B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $3.7B | $4.0B | $13.3B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.69x | 13.49x | 20.76x | 16.39x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.43x | 14.24x | 15.92x | 13.05x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.56x | 4.25x | 3.98x | 5.51x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.80x | 13.02x | 14.17x | 17.23x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.26x | 4.33x | 6.23x | 3.06x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.35x | 1.21x | 2.89x | 1.53x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.81x | 15.73x | 7.19x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFBS delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFBS's 0.81x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.9% | +9.3% | +13.3% | +8.9% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.4% | +1.6% | +1.1% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +6.8% | +11.0% | +4.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | +9.3% | +16.0% | +5.5% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.43x | 0.12x | 0.80x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $883M | -$566M | $3.0B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $95M | $108M | $763M | $1.4B | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $991M | $197M | $4.5B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 2.12x | 1.48x | 0.55x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOKF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $15,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 24.7% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.6% | +10.9% | +8.5% | +13.0% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.0% | +13.1% | -3.2% | +44.8% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.5% | +94.0% | +29.1% | +79.4% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.5% | +12.2% | -28.2% | +59.4% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +255.0% | +67.6% | +145.4% | +168.5% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.3% | +24.7% | +8.9% | +21.5% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOKF and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFBS's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BOKF currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 0.94x | 0.95x | 1.03x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $90.64 | $21.48 | $38.74 | $139.73 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $67.20 | $17.95 | $28.11 | $91.35 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.6% | +95.5% | +83.6% | +95.5% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 57.9 | 58.2 | 58.9 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 313K | 1.6M | 740K | 317K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and FFIN and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SFBS as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs BOKF's 1.68%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.00 | $24.75 | $39.25 | $131.57 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 16 | 15 | 21 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.0% | +2.2% | +1.7% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 | $0.72 | $2.24 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.9% | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SFBS vs CVBF vs FFIN vs BOKF vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFBS or CVBF or FFIN or BOKF or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFBS or CVBF or FFIN or BOKF or FIS?
On trailing P/E, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFBS or CVBF or FFIN or BOKF or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +59.
4%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFBS returned +255. 0% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFBS or CVBF or FFIN or BOKF or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning SFBS is approximately 62% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 81% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SFBS or CVBF or FFIN or BOKF or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 21. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SFBS or CVBF or FFIN or BOKF or FIS?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SFBS or CVBF or FFIN or BOKF or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — SFBS or CVBF or FFIN or BOKF or FIS?
In this comparison, CVBF (4.
0% yield), FIS (3. 5% yield), FFIN (2. 2% yield), BOKF (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SFBS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SFBS or CVBF or FFIN or BOKF or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -13. 2%, SFBS: +255. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SFBS and CVBF and FFIN and BOKF and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (SFBS (Financial Services) and CVBF (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and BOKF (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SFBS is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. CVBF, FFIN, BOKF, FIS pay a dividend while SFBS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.