Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SFIX vs RENT vs REAL vs CPRI vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Luxury Goods
Luxury Goods
Specialty Retail
SFIX vs RENT vs REAL vs CPRI vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Luxury Goods | Luxury Goods | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $483M | $18M | $3.59B | $2.23B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.32B | $315M | $723M | $3.71B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $11M | $-65M | $-504M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | 72.3% | 73.3% | 61.4% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1.8% | -20.3% | -1.9% | -1.8% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 307.7x | 13.4x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $94M | $381M | $463M | $3.10B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $114M | $77M | $151M | $166M | $86.81B |
SFIX vs RENT vs REAL vs CPRI vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stitch Fix, Inc. (SFIX) | 100 | 10.4 | -89.6% |
| Rent the Runway, In… (RENT) | 100 | 1.4 | -98.6% |
| The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
| Capri Holdings Limi… (CPRI) | 100 | 35.1 | -64.9% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 160.8 | +60.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFIX vs RENT vs REAL vs CPRI vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SFIX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, RENT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
REAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- 15.4% revenue growth vs CPRI's -7.7%
- +75.9% vs SFIX's +8.3%
CPRI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 34.8x)
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.51
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs REAL's -57.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 1.05x
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 1.05x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.4% revenue growth vs CPRI's -7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs CPRI's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs REAL's 2.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.9% vs SFIX's +8.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs REAL's -17.3% |
SFIX vs RENT vs REAL vs CPRI vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SFIX vs RENT vs REAL vs CPRI vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
SFIX leads 0 • RENT leads 0 • REAL leads 0 • CPRI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — REAL and AMZN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 2361.8x RENT's $315M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPRI's -13.6%. On growth, REAL holds the edge at +18.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $315M | $723M | $3.7B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $36M | $11M | $72M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | $11M | -$65M | -$504M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | -$14M | $13M | $491M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +72.3% | +73.3% | +61.4% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | -20.3% | -1.9% | -1.8% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | +3.4% | -9.0% | -13.6% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | -4.6% | +1.7% | +13.2% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.4% | +15.4% | +18.5% | -18.7% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.8% | +3.8% | -150.0% | +120.8% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RENT and CPRI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RENT's 4.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REAL's 430.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $483M | $18M | $3.6B | $2.2B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $463M | $321M | $3.9B | $5.2B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.34x | -0.26x | -18.24x | -1.87x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 307.69x | 13.36x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.30x | 430.51x | — | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.38x | 0.06x | 5.19x | 0.50x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.28x | — | — | 5.94x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 52.03x | — | 195.62x | 14.55x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-5 for CPRI. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPRI's 8.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SFIX scores 6/9 vs CPRI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.2% | — | — | -4.7% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.0% | +4.6% | -17.3% | -15.1% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.7% | -26.3% | — | -13.6% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.0% | -22.5% | -15.0% | -17.0% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | — | — | 8.34x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $303M | $312M | $2.9B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $114M | $77M | $151M | $166M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $94M | $381M | $463M | $3.1B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.69x | -5.83x | — | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — REAL and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $123 for RENT. Over the past 12 months, REAL leads with a +75.9% total return vs SFIX's +8.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REAL at 108.4% vs RENT's -53.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.8% | -41.5% | -21.5% | -23.4% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.3% | +21.5% | +75.9% | +18.4% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.5% | -90.2% | +805.1% | -50.5% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | -98.8% | -45.6% | -68.6% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.3% | -98.8% | -57.1% | -63.1% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.6% | -53.9% | +108.4% | -20.9% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMZN is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REAL's 2.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs RENT's 46.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.38x | 2.68x | 2.95x | 2.03x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.94 | $10.13 | $17.39 | $28.27 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.95 | $3.69 | $4.70 | $15.37 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.5% | +46.8% | +71.3% | +66.1% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 46.7 | 66.3 | 47.3 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 80K | 3.3M | 2.5M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SFIX as "Hold", RENT as "Hold", REAL as "Buy", CPRI as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 153.2% upside for RENT (target: $12) vs 11.3% for SFIX (target: $4).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.00 | $12.00 | $18.17 | $25.33 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 19 | 25 | 53 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Risk & Volatility. 3 categories are tied.
SFIX vs RENT vs REAL vs CPRI vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFIX or RENT or REAL or CPRI or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The RealReal, Inc.
(REAL) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for Stitch Fix, Inc. (SFIX). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFIX or RENT or REAL or CPRI or AMZN?
On forward P/E, Capri Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 13.
4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFIX or RENT or REAL or CPRI or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -98. 8% for Rent the Runway, Inc. (RENT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus RENT's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFIX or RENT or REAL or CPRI or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus The RealReal, Inc. 's 2. 95β — meaning REAL is approximately 96% more volatile than AMZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 8% for Capri Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SFIX or RENT or REAL or CPRI or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The RealReal, Inc.
(REAL) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus -5. 3% for Stitch Fix, Inc. (SFIX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stitch Fix, Inc. grew EPS 79. 4% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Capri Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, RENT leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SFIX or RENT or REAL or CPRI or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -26. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -16. 9% for CPRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RENT leads at 73. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SFIX or RENT or REAL or CPRI or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) trades at 13.
4x forward P/E versus 307. 7x for The RealReal, Inc. — 294. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RENT: 153. 2% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SFIX or RENT or REAL or CPRI or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SFIX or RENT or REAL or CPRI or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+697. 8% 10Y return). Rent the Runway, Inc. (RENT) carries a higher beta of 2. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +697. 8%, RENT: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SFIX and RENT and REAL and CPRI and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SFIX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RENT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CPRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.