Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SFST vs CBAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
SFST vs CBAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $538M | $371M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $225M | $186M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $28M |
| Gross Margin | 51.3% | 66.4% |
| Operating Margin | 17.6% | 18.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $265M | $268M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $27M |
SFST vs CBAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southern First Banc… (SFST) | 100 | 193.7 | +93.7% |
| Colony Bankcorp, In… (CBAN) | 100 | 156.1 | +56.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFST vs CBAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SFST is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.11 vs CBAN's 1.98
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBAN's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +57.5% vs CBAN's +32.1%
CBAN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 2.3%
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 16.9%
- 145.0% 10Y total return vs SFST's 122.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFST's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 11.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBAN's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.91 vs SFST's 0.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.5% vs CBAN's +32.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBAN's 0.5% |
SFST vs CBAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SFST vs CBAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBAN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFST and CBAN operate at a comparable scale, with $225M and $186M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.2% (CBAN) to 13.5% (SFST).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $225M | $186M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $44M | $42M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | $28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $9M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.3% | +66.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +18.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | -3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.9% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CBAN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, CBAN trades at a 18% valuation discount to SFST's 15.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SFST offers better value at 1.53x vs CBAN's 2.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $538M | $371M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $775M | $612M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.16x | 12.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.95x | 10.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.53x | 2.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.47x | 17.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.39x | 1.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.99x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBAN delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $9 for SFST. CBAN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.71x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFST's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SFST scores 8/9 vs CBAN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.6% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.9% | +1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 0.71x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $237M | $241M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $265M | $268M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.37x | 0.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SFST and CBAN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CBAN five years ago would be worth $13,521 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,666 for SFST. Over the past 12 months, SFST leads with a +57.5% total return vs CBAN's +32.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SFST at 37.3% vs CBAN's 33.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.0% | +13.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.5% | +32.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +158.8% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.7% | +35.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.3% | +145.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.3% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFST and CBAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBAN is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFST's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.00 | $21.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.51 | $14.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 128K | 258K |
Analyst Outlook
CBAN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SFST as "Hold" and CBAN as "Hold". CBAN is the only dividend payer here at 2.28% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $64.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% |
CBAN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SFST leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SFST vs CBAN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFST or CBAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Colony Bankcorp, Inc.
(CBAN) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Southern First Bancshares, Inc. (SFST). Colony Bankcorp, Inc. (CBAN) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Southern First Bancshares, Inc. (SFST) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFST or CBAN?
On trailing P/E, Colony Bankcorp, Inc.
(CBAN) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Southern First Bancshares, Inc. at 15. 2x. On forward P/E, Colony Bankcorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Southern First Bancshares, Inc. wins at 1. 11x versus Colony Bankcorp, Inc. 's 1. 98x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFST or CBAN?
Over the past 5 years, Colony Bankcorp, Inc.
(CBAN) delivered a total return of +35. 2%, compared to +6. 7% for Southern First Bancshares, Inc. (SFST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBAN returned +145. 6% versus SFST's +120. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFST or CBAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Colony Bankcorp, Inc.
(CBAN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Southern First Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning SFST is approximately 4% more volatile than CBAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Colony Bankcorp, Inc. (CBAN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 71% versus 72% for Southern First Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SFST or CBAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Colony Bankcorp, Inc.
(CBAN) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus 5. 3% for Southern First Bancshares, Inc. (SFST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern First Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 96. 3% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for Colony Bankcorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SFST or CBAN?
Colony Bankcorp, Inc.
(CBAN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus 13. 5% for Southern First Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBAN leads at 18. 9% versus 17. 6% for SFST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBAN leads at 66. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SFST or CBAN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Southern First Bancshares, Inc. (SFST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus Colony Bankcorp, Inc. 's 1. 98x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Colony Bankcorp, Inc. (CBAN) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 11. 0x for Southern First Bancshares, Inc. — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SFST or CBAN?
In this comparison, CBAN (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SFST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SFST or CBAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Colony Bankcorp, Inc.
(CBAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 2. 3% yield, +145. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBAN: +145. 6%, SFST: +120. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SFST and CBAN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CBAN pays a dividend while SFST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.