Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SGD vs PAYO vs WU vs GREE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Capital Markets
SGD vs PAYO vs WU vs GREE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $155K | $1.74B | $2.83B | $19M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $1.07B | $4.04B | $60M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $72M | $441M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | 16.6% | 61.9% | 28.7% | 79.7% |
| Operating Margin | -186.2% | 11.7% | 19.4% | -19.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.3x | 5.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $10M | $72M | $0.00 | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $296K | $416M | $1.23B | $9M |
SGD vs PAYO vs WU vs GREE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safe and Green Deve… (SGD) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) | 100 | 104.4 | +4.4% |
| The Western Union C… (WU) | 100 | 71.1 | -28.9% |
| Greenidge Generatio… (GREE) | 100 | 31.5 | -68.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGD vs PAYO vs WU vs GREE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 27.7% FFO/revenue growth vs GREE's -15.4%
PAYO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth -38.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.65, Low D/E 10.3%, current ratio 1.00x
WU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 10.4%
- -7.6% 10Y total return vs PAYO's -47.7%
- Beta 0.63, yield 10.4%, current ratio 16.52x
- Better valuation composite
GREE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +29.0% vs SGD's -80.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.7% FFO/revenue growth vs GREE's -15.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs SGD's -277.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs GREE's 3.33 | |
| Dividends | 10.4% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs SGD's -80.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.5% ROA vs SGD's -35.9%, ROIC 23.3% vs -50.6% |
SGD vs PAYO vs WU vs GREE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SGD vs PAYO vs WU vs GREE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WU leads in 3 of 6 categories
SGD leads 0 • PAYO leads 0 • GREE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WU and GREE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WU is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 813.0x SGD's $5M. WU is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SGD's -2.8%. On growth, SGD holds the edge at +42.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $1.1B | $4.0B | $60M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $208M | $838M | $4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $72M | $441M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $215M | $331M | -$20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +61.9% | +28.7% | +79.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -186.2% | +11.7% | +19.4% | -19.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +6.8% | +12.4% | -33.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -52.9% | +20.2% | +9.7% | -37.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.3% | +6.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +20.0% | -44.4% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, WU trades at a 78% valuation discount to PAYO's 26.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WU's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GREE's 38.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $155,445 | $1.7B | $2.8B | $19M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $1.4B | $1.6B | $79M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | 26.63x | 5.90x | -0.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.27x | 5.18x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.36x | 1.68x | 38.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 1.66x | 0.70x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.18x | 2.71x | 3.09x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.44x | 7.20x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PAYO and WU each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WU delivers a 47.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-7 for SGD. PAYO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SGD's 11.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SGD scores 5/9 vs GREE's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.0% | +10.0% | +47.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.9% | +0.9% | +5.5% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.6% | +30.7% | +23.3% | -57.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +14.9% | +12.5% | -23.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 11.95x | 0.10x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | -$343M | -$1.2B | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $296,202 | $416M | $1.2B | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $72M | $0 | $68M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.89x | 17.23x | 2.11x | 0.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WU five years ago would be worth $5,468 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13 for SGD. Over the past 12 months, GREE leads with a +29.0% total return vs SGD's -80.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WU at -1.1% vs SGD's -89.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.9% | -7.0% | +0.4% | -25.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.4% | -17.9% | +4.5% | +29.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -9.0% | -3.3% | -71.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -49.8% | -45.3% | -99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -47.7% | -7.6% | -62.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -89.1% | -3.1% | -1.1% | -33.8% |
Risk & Volatility
WU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WU is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GREE's 3.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WU currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs SGD's 6.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 1.64x | 0.60x | 3.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.36 | $7.67 | $10.35 | $2.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.11 | $4.08 | $7.85 | $0.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.9% | +66.0% | +87.2% | +50.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.0 | 45.1 | 45.5 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 3.5M | 8.1M | 138K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PAYO as "Buy", WU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.1% upside for PAYO (target: $8) vs -0.3% for WU (target: $9). WU is the only dividend payer here at 10.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 | $9.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 48 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +10.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 11 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.94 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.0% | +8.3% | 0.0% |
WU leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
SGD vs PAYO vs WU vs GREE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGD or PAYO or WU or GREE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Payoneer Global Inc.
(PAYO) is the stronger pick with 7. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). The Western Union Company (WU) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (5. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SGD or PAYO or WU or GREE?
On trailing P/E, The Western Union Company (WU) is the cheapest at 5.
9x versus Payoneer Global Inc. at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, The Western Union Company is actually cheaper at 5. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SGD or PAYO or WU or GREE?
Over the past 5 years, The Western Union Company (WU) delivered a total return of -45.
3%, compared to -99. 9% for Safe and Green Development Corporation (SGD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WU returned -7. 4% versus SGD's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SGD or PAYO or WU or GREE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Western Union Company (WU) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
60β versus Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning GREE is approximately 462% more volatile than WU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 12% for Safe and Green Development Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SGD or PAYO or WU or GREE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Payoneer Global Inc.
(PAYO) is pulling ahead at 7. 7% versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. grew EPS 57. 6% year-over-year, compared to -21. 2% for Safe and Green Development Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SGD or PAYO or WU or GREE?
The Western Union Company (WU) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
4% net margin versus -42. 9% for Safe and Green Development Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WU leads at 19. 4% versus -31. 6% for SGD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GREE leads at 79. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SGD or PAYO or WU or GREE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Western Union Company (WU) trades at 5.
2x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Payoneer Global Inc. — 15. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAYO: 58. 1% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SGD or PAYO or WU or GREE?
In this comparison, WU (10.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SGD, PAYO, GREE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SGD or PAYO or WU or GREE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Western Union Company (WU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
60), 10. 4% yield). Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WU: -7. 4%, GREE: -62. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SGD and PAYO and WU and GREE?
These companies operate in different sectors (SGD (Real Estate) and PAYO (Technology) and WU (Financial Services) and GREE (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SGD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAYO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WU is a small-cap deep-value stock; GREE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WU pays a dividend while SGD, PAYO, GREE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.