SGRP vs MMS vs KELYA vs HSII vs CTAS

For growth investors, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the stronger pick with 7.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). Maximus, Inc. (MMS) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Maximus, Inc. (MMS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Maximus, Inc.

(MMS) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. at 143. 9x. On forward P/E, Maximus, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Maximus, Inc. wins at 0. 77x versus Cintas Corporation's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) delivered a total return of +95.

8%, compared to -58. 9% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTAS returned +685. 0% versus KELYA's -33. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SPAR Group, Inc.

(SGRP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Kelly Services, Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning KELYA is approximately 1825% more volatile than SGRP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 86% for Maximus, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is pulling ahead at 7.

7% versus -5. 5% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cintas Corporation grew EPS 16. 1% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTAS leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

5% net margin versus -9. 0% for SPAR Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTAS leads at 22. 8% versus -2. 2% for SGRP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTAS leads at 50. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Maximus, Inc. (MMS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus Cintas Corporation's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Maximus, Inc. (MMS) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Cintas Corporation — 26. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMS: 65. 0% to $110. 00.

In this comparison, KELYA (3.

2% yield), MMS (1. 8% yield), HSII (1. 0% yield), CTAS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SGRP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

51), 0. 9% yield, +685. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTAS: +685. 0%, KELYA: -33. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SGRP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMS is a small-cap deep-value stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HSII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CTAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MMS, KELYA, HSII, CTAS pay a dividend while SGRP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.