Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SHAK vs TXRH vs MCD vs RRGB vs QSR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.79B
5Y Perf.+24.7%
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.41B
5Y Perf.+204.6%
MCD
McDonald's Corporation

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$201.63B
5Y Perf.+52.2%
RRGB
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$81M
5Y Perf.-73.5%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CA
Market Cap$27.42B
5Y Perf.+45.1%

SHAK vs TXRH vs MCD vs RRGB vs QSR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SHAK logoSHAK
TXRH logoTXRH
MCD logoMCD
RRGB logoRRGB
QSR logoQSR
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Cap$2.79B$10.41B$201.63B$81M$27.42B
Revenue (TTM)$1.49B$6.06B$27.45B$1.21B$9.59B
Net Income (TTM)$41M$415M$8.68B$-23M$955M
Gross Margin7.5%18.7%44.1%26.8%33.1%
Operating Margin4.3%8.2%46.3%0.2%25.1%
Forward P/E50.2x25.0x21.5x19.5x
Total Debt$902M$1.89B$54.81B$514M$17.58B
Cash & Equiv.$360M$135M$774M$20M$1.16B

SHAK vs TXRH vs MCD vs RRGB vs QSRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SHAK
TXRH
MCD
RRGB
QSR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK)100124.7+24.7%
Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH)100304.6+204.6%
McDonald's Corporat… (MCD)100152.2+52.2%
Red Robin Gourmet B… (RRGB)10026.5-73.5%
Restaurant Brands I… (QSR)100145.1+45.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SHAK vs TXRH vs MCD vs RRGB vs QSR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MCD leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Shake Shack Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. TXRH, RRGB, and QSR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.
The Growth Play

SHAK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 354.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
  • 15.4% revenue growth vs RRGB's -3.1%
Best for: growth exposure
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

TXRH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 288.0% 10Y total return vs MCD's 157.7%
  • PEG 1.17 vs MCD's 2.81
  • PEG 1.17 vs 2.81
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
The Income Pick

MCD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 27 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 2.5%
  • 31.6% margin vs RRGB's -1.9%
  • Beta 0.11 vs RRGB's 2.10
  • 14.5% ROA vs RRGB's -4.1%, ROIC 18.7% vs 0.5%
Best for: income & stability
RRGB
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

RRGB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +34.9% vs SHAK's -32.1%
Best for: momentum
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
The Defensive Pick

QSR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.39, current ratio 0.98x
  • Beta 0.39, yield 3.1%, current ratio 0.98x
  • 3.1% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs MCD's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSHAK logoSHAK15.4% revenue growth vs RRGB's -3.1%
ValueTXRH logoTXRHPEG 1.17 vs 2.81
Quality / MarginsMCD logoMCD31.6% margin vs RRGB's -1.9%
Stability / SafetyMCD logoMCDBeta 0.11 vs RRGB's 2.10
DividendsQSR logoQSR3.1% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs MCD's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)RRGB logoRRGB+34.9% vs SHAK's -32.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MCD logoMCD14.5% ROA vs RRGB's -4.1%, ROIC 18.7% vs 0.5%

SHAK vs TXRH vs MCD vs RRGB vs QSR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SHAKShake Shack Inc.
FY 2025
Shack Sales
96.3%$1.4B
Sales-Based Royalties
3.6%$52M
Initial Territory and Opening Fees
0.2%$3M
TXRHTexas Roadhouse, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
99.5%$5.8B
Franchise royalties
0.5%$28M
Franchise fees
0.0%$3M
MCDMcDonald's Corporation
FY 2025
High-Growth Markets
50.7%$13.6B
UNITED STATES
40.3%$10.8B
International Developmental Licensed Markets and Corporate
9.0%$2.4B
RRGBRed Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
98.3%$1.2B
Franchise
1.2%$14M
Products And Services, Gift Card Breakage
0.4%$5M
Products And Services, Gift Card
0.1%$1M
QSRRestaurant Brands International Inc.
FY 2025
Tim Hortons
62.5%$4.2B
Burger King
22.3%$1.5B
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
11.8%$800M
Firehouse Subs
3.4%$232M

SHAK vs TXRH vs MCD vs RRGB vs QSR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMCDLAGGINGQSR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MCD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MCD is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.4B annually — 22.7x RRGB's $1.2B. MCD is the more profitable business, keeping 31.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RRGB's -1.9%. On growth, SHAK holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …MCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…RRGB logoRRGBRed Robin Gourmet…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.5B$6.1B$27.4B$1.2B$9.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$173M$709M$14.4B$54M$2.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$41M$415M$8.7B-$23M$955M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$16M$441M$7.2B$6M$1.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+7.5%+18.7%+44.1%+26.8%+33.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.3%+8.2%+46.3%+0.2%+25.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.8%+6.8%+31.6%-1.9%+10.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.1%+7.3%+26.2%+0.5%+15.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.3%+12.8%+9.4%-5.7%+7.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-110.0%+10.0%+6.9%+77.4%+102.1%
MCD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RRGB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 23.7x trailing earnings, MCD trades at a 63% valuation discount to SHAK's 63.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TXRH offers better value at 0.38x vs QSR's 4.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …MCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…RRGB logoRRGBRed Robin Gourmet…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…
Market CapShares × price$2.8B$10.4B$201.6B$81M$27.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.3B$12.2B$255.7B$575M$43.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS63.53x25.89x23.74x-2.80x33.68x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.50.21x25.05x21.51x19.50x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.38x1.74x4.21x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.31x17.15x17.57x10.66x17.81x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.93x1.77x7.50x0.07x2.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.23x7.09x7.01x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF49.34x30.44x28.06x13.00x18.93x
RRGB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MCD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

TXRH delivers a 37.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $8 for SHAK. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QSR's 3.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHAK scores 7/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …MCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…RRGB logoRRGBRed Robin Gourmet…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.6%+37.4%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.2%+12.2%+14.5%-4.1%+3.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.0%+14.5%+18.7%+0.5%+8.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.4%+20.1%+23.3%+0.7%+9.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974756
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.63x1.27x3.41x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$542M$1.8B$54.0B$494M$16.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$360M$135M$774M$20M$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$902M$1.9B$54.8B$514M$17.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense16.87x6.09x0.26x3.65x
MCD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $16,160 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,032 for RRGB. Over the past 12 months, RRGB leads with a +34.9% total return vs SHAK's -32.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 15.4% vs RRGB's -33.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …MCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…RRGB logoRRGBRed Robin Gourmet…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-17.0%-7.4%-5.8%-11.4%+17.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-32.1%-6.2%-8.6%+34.9%+20.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.5%+53.6%+2.5%-70.5%+19.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-22.6%+61.6%+34.3%-89.7%+30.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+98.2%+288.0%+157.7%-94.4%+132.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.1%+15.4%+0.8%-33.4%+6.0%
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MCD and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MCD is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RRGB's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QSR currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs RRGB's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …MCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…RRGB logoRRGBRed Robin Gourmet…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.75x0.70x0.11x2.10x0.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$144.65$199.99$341.75$7.89$81.96
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$67.20$153.82$282.15$2.46$61.33
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+47.9%+79.0%+83.0%+46.5%+96.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.045.730.951.647.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M983K3.0M384K3.3M
Evenly matched — MCD and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MCD and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SHAK as "Hold", TXRH as "Hold", MCD as "Buy", RRGB as "Hold", QSR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 90.7% upside for RRGB (target: $7) vs 5.8% for QSR (target: $84). For income investors, QSR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.06% vs TXRH's 1.72%.

MetricSHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …MCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…RRGB logoRRGBRed Robin Gourmet…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$120.89$191.64$352.25$7.00$83.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts3543623844
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+2.5%+3.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises052714
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.71$7.14$2.42
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.4%+1.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — MCD and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MCD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RRGB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallMcDonald's Corporation (MCD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SHAK vs TXRH vs MCD vs RRGB vs QSR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SHAK or TXRH or MCD or RRGB or QSR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Shake Shack Inc.

(SHAK) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). McDonald's Corporation (MCD) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McDonald's Corporation (MCD) a "Buy" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SHAK or TXRH or MCD or RRGB or QSR?

On trailing P/E, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the cheapest at 23.

7x versus Shake Shack Inc. at 63. 5x. On forward P/E, Restaurant Brands International Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Texas Roadhouse, Inc. wins at 1. 17x versus McDonald's Corporation's 2. 81x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SHAK or TXRH or MCD or RRGB or QSR?

Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) delivered a total return of +61. 6%, compared to -89. 7% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus RRGB's -94. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SHAK or TXRH or MCD or RRGB or QSR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

11β versus Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning RRGB is approximately 1782% more volatile than MCD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 3% for Restaurant Brands International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SHAK or TXRH or MCD or RRGB or QSR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shake Shack Inc.

(SHAK) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus -3. 1% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for Restaurant Brands International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHAK leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SHAK or TXRH or MCD or RRGB or QSR?

McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more profitable company, earning 31.

9% net margin versus -1. 9% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCD leads at 46. 1% versus 0. 2% for RRGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRGB leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SHAK or TXRH or MCD or RRGB or QSR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 17x versus McDonald's Corporation's 2. 81x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) trades at 19. 5x forward P/E versus 50. 2x for Shake Shack Inc. — 30. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRGB: 90. 7% to $7. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SHAK or TXRH or MCD or RRGB or QSR?

In this comparison, QSR (3.

1% yield), MCD (2. 5% yield), TXRH (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SHAK, RRGB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SHAK or TXRH or MCD or RRGB or QSR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

11), 2. 5% yield, +157. 7% 10Y return). Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +157. 7%, RRGB: -94. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SHAK and TXRH and MCD and RRGB and QSR?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MCD is a large-cap quality compounder stock; RRGB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QSR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. TXRH, MCD, QSR pay a dividend while SHAK, RRGB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SHAK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TXRH

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MCD

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RRGB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

QSR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SHAK and TXRH and MCD and RRGB and QSR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SHAK: 14.3% · TXRH: 12.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(SHAK: 2.8% · TXRH: 6.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SHAK: 63.5x · TXRH: 25.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.